Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:29:41.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Patient Dignity Inventory: Just another evaluation tool? Experiences with advanced cancer patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

María Rullán*
Affiliation:
Programa de Investigación ATLANTES, Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, España
María Arantzamendi
Affiliation:
Programa de Investigación ATLANTES, Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España Área de Oncología y Hematología, Grupo de Medicina Paliativa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España
Ana Carvajal
Affiliation:
Programa de Investigación ATLANTES, Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España Área de Oncología y Hematología, Grupo de Medicina Paliativa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España Departamento de la Persona Adulta, Universidad de Navarra, Facultad de Enfermería, Pamplona, España
Marina Martínez
Affiliation:
Programa de Investigación ATLANTES, Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España Área de Oncología y Hematología, Grupo de Medicina Paliativa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España Departamento de Medicina Paliativa, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
Amaia Saenz de Ormijana
Affiliation:
Osakidetza, Dirección de Integración Asistencial de la Organización Sanitaria Integrada Araba, País Vasco, España
Carlos Centeno
Affiliation:
Programa de Investigación ATLANTES, Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España Área de Oncología y Hematología, Grupo de Medicina Paliativa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, España Departamento de Medicina Paliativa, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: María Rullán Iriarte, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain. E mail: [email protected] or [email protected].

Abstract

Objective:

The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) evaluates sources of distress related to the feeling of loss of dignity and was designed for patients at the end of life. The aim of the present work was to generate a better understanding of the experiences of healthcare staff when using the PDI.

Method:

An exploratory qualitative study is presented about the experience of 4 professionals who applied the PDI to 124 advanced-cancer patients. Our study consisted of an analysis of their experiences, taken from information generated in a focus group. A thematic analysis was performed on the information generated at that meeting by two researchers working independently.

Results:

The initial experiences with the PDI on the part of the professionals led them to systematically administer the questionnaire as part of an interview instead of having patients fill it out themselves in written form. What started out as an evaluation very often led to a profound conversation on the meaning of life, dignity, and other sensitive, key issues related to the process of the illness.

Significance of results:

The PDI has intrinsic therapeutic value and is useful in clinical practice, and it is also a way of examining issues related to dignity and the meaning of life within the context of advanced-stage illness. There is a need for studies that examine patient experiences through a PDI-based interview.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbaszadeh, A., Borhani, F. & Rabori, M.R. (2015). Patient dignity in coronary care: Psychometrics of the Persian version of the Patient Dignity Inventory. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research, 8(5), 463469.Google Scholar
Alesi, E.R., Ford, T.R., Chen, C.J., et al. (2015). Development of the CASH assessment tool to address existential concerns in patients with serious illness. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18(1), 7175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benito, E., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., et al. (2014). Development and validation of a new tool for the assessment and spiritual care of palliative care patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47(6), 10081018.Google Scholar
Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Pessin, H., et al. (2015). Meaning-centered group psychotherapy: An effective intervention for improving psychological well-being in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(7), 749754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnard, P., Gill, P., Stewart, K., et al. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal, 204(8), 429432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvajal, A., Centeno, C., Watson, R., et al. (2011). A comprehensive study of psychometric properties of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Spanish advanced cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 47(12), 18631872.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M. (2007). Dignity and the essence of medicine: The A, B, C & D of dignity-conserving care. British Medical Journal, 335(7612), 184187.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., Hack, T., Hassard, T., et al. (2002 a). Dignity in the terminally ill: A cross-sectional, cohort study. Lancet, 360(9350), 20262030.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., Hack, T., McClement, S., et al. (2002 b). Dignity in the terminally ill: A developing empirical model. Social Science & Medicine, 54(3), 433443.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., Hassard, T., McClement, S., et al. (2008). The Patient Dignity Inventory: A novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36(6), 559571.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., McClement, S., Hack, T., et al. (2012). The Patient Dignity Inventory: Applications in the oncology setting. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15(9), 9981005.Google Scholar
Di Lorenzo, R., Cabri, G., Carretti, E., et al. (2017). A preliminary study of Patient Dignity Inventory validation among patients hospitalized in an acute psychiatric ward. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 13, 177190.Google Scholar
Hack, T.F., Chochinov, H.M., Hassard, T., et al. (2004). Defining dignity in terminally ill cancer patients: A factor-analytic approach. Psycho-Oncology, 13(10), 700708.Google Scholar
Monforte-Royol, C., Villavicencio-Chávez, R.W., Tomás-Sábado, J. (2011). The wish to hasten death: A review of clinical studies. Psycho-Oncology, 20(8), 795804.Google Scholar
Morgan, D.L. (1998). The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mowll, J., Lobb, E.A., Lane, L., et al. (2015). A preliminary study to develop an intervention to facilitate communication between couples in advanced cancer. Palliative & Supportive Care, 13(5), 13811390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, S.A., Sanson-Fisher, R.W. & Savolainen, N.J. (2002). Systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients: Overview and recommendations for future research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(8), 558584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ripamonti, C.I., Buonacorso, L., Maruelli, A., et al. (2012). Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire: The validation study in Italian patients with solid and hematological cancers on active oncological treatments. Tumori, 98(4), 491500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rullán, M., Carvajal, A., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., et al. (2015). Spanish version of the Patient Dignity Inventory: Translation and validation in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 50(6), 874881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sautier, L., Vehling, S. & Mehnert, A. (2014). Assessment of patients' dignity in cancer care: Preliminary psychometrics of the German version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI–G). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47(1), 181188.Google Scholar