Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T15:12:59.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oncologists' perspectives on concurrent palliative care in a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2012

Marie Bakitas ,
Kathleen Doyle Lyons ,
Mark T. Hegel  and
Tim Ahles
Marie Bakitas*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
Kathleen Doyle Lyons
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
Mark T. Hegel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
Tim Ahles
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Marie Bakitas, Section of Palliative Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to understand oncology clinicians' perspectives about the care of advanced cancer patients following the completion of the ENABLE II (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) randomized clinical trial (RCT) of a concurrent oncology palliative care model.

Method:

This was a qualitative interview study of 35 oncology clinicians about their approach to patients with advanced cancer and the effect of the ENABLE II RCT.

Results:

Oncologists believed that integrating palliative care at the time of an advanced cancer diagnosis enhanced patient care and complemented their practice. Self-assessment of their practice with advanced cancer patients comprised four themes: (1) treating the whole patient, (2) focusing on quality versus quantity of life, (3) “some patients just want to fight,” and (4) helping with transitions; timing is everything. Five themes comprised oncologists' views on the complementary role of palliative care: (1) “refer early and often,” (2) referral challenges: “Palliative” equals “hospice”; “Heme patients are different,” (3) palliative care as consultants or co-managers, (4) palliative care “shares the load,” and (5) ENABLE II facilitated palliative care integration.

Significance of results:

Oncologists described the RCT as holistic and complementary, and as a significant factor in adopting concurrent care as a standard of care.

Keywords

OncologistOncology nurse practitionerConcurrent oncology palliative careQualitative researchHealthcare delivery
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 415 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Back, A.L., Arnold, R.M., Tulsky, J.A., et al. (2003). Teaching communication skills to medical oncology fellows. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 2433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baile, W., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., et al. (2000). SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist, 5, 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakitas, M., Ahles, T., Skalla, K., et al. (2008). Proxy perspectives regarding end-of-life care for persons with cancer. Cancer, 112, 1854–1861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakitas, M., Lyons, K., Dixon, J., et al. (2006). Palliative care program effectiveness research: Developing rigor in sampling design, conduct and reporting. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31, 270–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakitas, M., Lyons, K., Hegel, M., et al. (2009a). Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: The Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Assocation, 302, 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakitas, M., Lyons, K., Hegel, M., et al. (2009b). Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial to improve palliative care for rural patients with advanced cancer: Baseline findings, methodological challenges, and solutions. Palliative & Supportive Care, 7, 75–86.Google Scholar
Bakitas, M., Stevens, M., Ahles, T., et al. (2004). Project ENABLE: A palliative care demonstration project for advanced cancer patients in three settings. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 7, 363–372.Google Scholar
Buss, M.K., Lessen, D.S., Sullivan, A.M., et al. (2007). A study of oncology fellows' training in end-of-life care. Journal of Supportive Oncology, 5, 237–242.Google ScholarPubMed
Center to Advance Palliative Care. (2011). 2011 Public Opinion Research on Palliative Care: A Report Based on Research by Public Opinion Strategies. New York: Center to Advance Palliative Care and American Cancer Society Action Network.Google Scholar
Cherny, N.I. & Catane, R. (2003). Attitutudes of medical oncologists toward palliative care for patients with advanced and incurable cancer: Report on a survey by the European Society of Medical Oncology Taskforce on Palliative and Supportive Care. Cancer, 98, 2502–2510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, C.C., Landrum, M.B., Souza, J.M., et al. (2008). Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 3860–3866.Google Scholar
El-jawahri, A., Greer, J.A. & Temel, J.S. (2011). Does palliative care improve outcomes for patients with incurable illness? A review of the evidence. The Journal of Supportive Oncology, 9, 87–94.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, J.B., McClive-Reed, K.P., Toseland, R.W., et al. (2006). Effects of a program for coordinated care of advanced illness on patients, surrogates, and healthcare costs: a randomized trial. American Journal of Managed Care, 12, 93–100.Google Scholar
Fadul, N., Elsayem, A., Palmer, J.L., et al. (2009). Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name? Cancer, 115, 2013–2021.Google Scholar
Fallowfield, L., Jenkins, V., Farewell, V., et al. (2002). Efficacy of a cancer research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 359, 650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fallowfield, L., Jenkins, V., Farewell, V., et al. (2003). Enduring impact of communication skills training: Results of a 12-month follow up. British Journal of Cancer, 89, 1445.Google Scholar
Ferrell, B.R. (2005). Late referrals to palliative care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 908–909.Google Scholar
Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.Google Scholar
Grunfeld, E., Whelan, T.J., Zitzelsberger, L., et al. (2000). Cancer care workers in Ontario: Prevalence of burnout, job stress and job satisfaction. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163, 166.Google Scholar
Jackson, V.A., Mack, J., Matsuyama, R., et al. (2008). A Qualitative Study of Oncologists' Approaches to End-of-Life Care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11, 893–906.Google Scholar
Kash, K.M., Holland, J.C., Breitbart, W., et al. (2000). Stress and burnout in oncology. Oncology, 14, 1621.Google Scholar
Lamont, E. & Christakis, N.A. (2002). Physician factors in the timing of cancer patient referral to hospice palliative care. Cancer, 94, 2733–2737.Google Scholar
Larochelle, M.R., Rodriguez, K.L., Arnold, R.M., et al. (2009). Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatment intensity. Palliative Medicine, 23, 460–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lofmark, R., Nilstun, T. & Bolmsjo, I.A. (2007). From cure to palliation: Concept, decision and acceptance. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 685–688.Google Scholar
Mahon, M.M. & McAuley, W.J. (2010). Oncology nurses' personal understandings about palliative care. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37, E141–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, P.D. & Holewa, H.A. (2007). Description of an Australian model for end-of-life care in patients with hematologic malignancies. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morita, T., Akechi, T., Ikenaga, M., et al. (2005). Late referrals to specialized palliative care service in Japan. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 107–114.Google Scholar
Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2005). Understanding qualitative research design. In Essentials of Nursing Research Method, Appraisal, and Utilization. New York: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, K.L., Gambino, F.J., Butow, P., et al. (2007). Pushing up daisies: Implicit and explicit language in oncologist–patient communication about death. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandelowski, M. (1996). Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 19, 359–364.Google Scholar
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description. Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334–340.Google Scholar
Smith, T.J., Temin, S., Alesi, E.R., et al. (2012). American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: The integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30, 880–887.Google Scholar
Temel, J.S., Greer, J.A., Muzikansky, A., et al. (2010). Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 733–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Gunten, C.F. (2008). Oncologists and end-of-life care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11, 813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetle, T., Shield, R., Teno, J., et al. (2005). Family perspectives on end-of-life care experiences in nursing homes. Gerontologist, 45, 642–650.Google Scholar