Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:34:31.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modes of relating to contingency: An exploration of experiences in advanced cancer patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

Renske Kruizinga ,
Iris D. Hartog ,
Michael Scherer-Rath ,
Hans Schilderman  and
Hanneke Van Laarhoven
Renske Kruizinga*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Iris D. Hartog
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Michael Scherer-Rath
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Studies, Radboud University–Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Hans Schilderman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Studies, Radboud University–Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Hanneke Van Laarhoven
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Renske Kruizinga, Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, F4-261, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Throughout their lives, people are confronted with unexpected life events, which can be difficult to incorporate into their life narratives. Such a confrontation can result in an experience of contingency. Different ways of relating to contingency have been described by Wuchterl: denying, acknowledging, and “encounter with the Other.” In the present article, we aim to trace these theoretical distinctions in real-life experiences of patients.

Method:

We analyzed 45 interviews using the constant comparative method with a directed content analysis approach in the Atlas.ti coding program. The interviews originated from a randomized controlled trial evaluating an assisted reflection on life events and ultimate life goals. Seven spiritual counselors from six hospitals in the Netherlands conducted the interviews from July of 2014 to March of 2016. All 45 patients had advanced cancer.

Results:

We found four different modes into which relating to contingency can be classified: denying, acknowledging, accepting, and receiving. With denying, patients did not mention any impact of the life event on their lives. In acknowledging, the impact was recognized and a start was made to incorporate the event into their life. In accepting, patients went through a process of reinterpretation of the event. In receiving, patients talked about receiving insights from their illness and living a more conscious life.

Significance of results:

Our study is the first to investigate the different ways of relating to contingency in clinical practice. The defined modes will improve our understanding of the various ways in which cancer patients relate to their disease, allowing caregivers to better target and shape individual care.

Keywords

CancerSpiritualityExperiences of contingencyQualitativeInterview study
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 444 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Shared first authorship.

References

REFERENCES

Baart, I. (2002). Ziekte en zingeving: Een onderzoek naar chronische ziekte en subjectiviteit [in Dutch]. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum BV.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Benzein, E., Norberg, A. & Saveman, B.I. (2001). The meaning of the lived experience of hope in patients with cancer in palliative home care. Palliative Medicine, 15(2), 117–126.Google Scholar
Blitz, I. (2008). Crohngetuige: Een narratief onderzoek naar betekenisgeving bij jongeren met de ziekte van Crohn [in Dutch]. Doctoral dissertation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391–409. Available from http://qualquant.org/wp-content/uploads/text/Boeije%202002-1.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167–182. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939/pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, C., Lau, H.P. & Chan, M.P. (2014). Coping flexibility and psychological adjustment to stressful life changes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1582. Epub ahead of print Sep 15. Available from https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/204912/1/Content.pdf.Google Scholar
Dalferth, I.U. & Stoellger, P. (2007). Einleitung: Religion zwischen Selbstverständlichkeit, Unselbstverständlichkeit und Unverständlichkeit [in German]. In Hermeneutik der religion, Dalfert, I.U. & Stoellger, P. (eds.), pp. 1–21. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Edwards, A., Pang, N., Shiu, V., et al. (2010). The understanding of spirituality and the potential role of spiritual care in end-of-life and palliative care: A meta-study of qualitative research. Palliative Medicine, 24(8), 753–770. Epub ahead of print Jul 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fife, R.B. (2002). Are existential questions the norm for terminally ill patients? Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5(6), 815–817.Google Scholar
Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ganzevoort, R.R. (2012). Narrative approaches. In The Wiley–Blackwell companion to practical theology. Miller-McLemore, B. (ed.), pp. 214–223. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell. Available from http://www.ruardganzevoort.nl/pdf/2011_Narrative_approaches.pdf.Google Scholar
Ganzevoort, R.R. & Bouwer, J. (2007). Life story methods and care for the elderly: An empirical research project in practical theology. In Dreaming the land: Theologies of resistance and hope. Ziebertz, H.G. & Schweitzer, F. (eds.), pp. 140–151. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Houtepen, R. & Hendrikx, D. (2003). Nurses and the virtues of dealing with existential questions in terminal palliative care. Nursing Ethics, 10(4), 377–387.Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, M. & Murray, S.A. (2005). Tales of the unexpected: Patients' poetic accounts of the journey to a diagnosis of lung cancer. A prospective serial qualitative interview study. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(5), 733–751.Google Scholar
Keupp, H., Ahbe, T., Gmür, W., et al. (2006). Identitätskonstruktionen: Das Patchwork der Identitäten in der Spätmoderne [in German]. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Kruizinga, R., Scherer-Rath, M., Schilderman, J.B.A.M., et al. (2013). The life in sight application study (LISA): Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the role of an assisted structured reflection on life events and ultimate life goals to improve quality of life of cancer patients. BMC Cancer, 13(1), 360. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3727984/.Google Scholar
Kruizinga, R., Hartog, I.D., Jacobs, M., et al. (2015). The effect of spiritual interventions addressing existential themes using a narrative approach on quality of life of cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 25(3), 253–265. Epub ahead of print Aug 10.Google Scholar
Kruizinga, R., Helmich, E., Schilderman, J.B.A.M., et al. (2016). Professional identity at stake: A phenomenological analysis of spiritual counselors' experiences working with a structured model to provide care to palliative cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(7), 3111–3118. Epub ahead of print Feb 26. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877411/.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
Liebau, E. & Zirfas, J. (2014). Dramen der Moderne: Kontingenz und Tragik im Zeitalter der Freiheit [in German]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Luthar, S.S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation, Vol. 3, 2nd ed. Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D.J. (eds.), pp. 739–795. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Makropoulos, M. (2004). Kontingenz Aspekte einer theoretischen Semantik der Moderne [in German]. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 45(3), 369–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, B.M., Boston, P.H. & Cohen, S.R. (2007). Healing connections: On moving from suffering to a sense of well-being. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 33(4), 372–388. Available from http://www.jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-3924(06)00726-3/pdf.Google Scholar
Murray, M. (1999). The storied nature of health and illness. In Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods. Murray, M. & Chamberlain, K. (eds.), pp. 47–63. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olthof, J. & Vermetten, E. (1984). De mens als verhaal, narratieve strategieën in psychotherapie van kinderen en volwassenen [in Dutch]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: De Tijdstroom.Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Leech, N.L. (2005). The role of sampling in qualitative research. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 280–285.Google Scholar
Pargament, K.I., Ishler, K., Dubow, E., et al. (1994). Methods of religious coping with the Gulf War: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pargament, K.I., Smith, B.W., Koenig, H.G., et al. (1998). Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(4), 710–724.Google Scholar
Pargament, K.I., Koenig, H.G. & Perez, L.M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543. Available from http://www.jpsych.com/pdfs/Pargament,%20Koenig%20&%20Perez,%202000.pdf.Google Scholar
Park, C.L. & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 115–144.Google Scholar
Pearce, M.J., Coan, A.D., Herndon II, J.E., et al. (2012). Unmet spiritual care needs impact emotional and spiritual well-being in advanced cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(10), 2269–2276. Epub ahead of print Nov 29, 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearlin, L.I. & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(1), 2–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puchalski, C.M. (2001). The role of spirituality in health care. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 14(4), 352–357. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1305900/.Google Scholar
Puchalski, C.M. (2014). The FICA Spiritual History Tool #274. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 17(1), 105–106. Epub ahead of print Dec 18, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puchalski, C.M., Ferrell, B., Virani, R., et al. (2009). Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: The report of the Consensus Conference. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 12(10), 885–904. Available from https://www.growthhouse.org/spirit/files/spiritual_care_consensus_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Richter, H.E. (1983). All mighty: A study of the God complex in Western man. Trans. Ian Van Heurck. Claremont, CA: Hunter House.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Zufall und Vernunft in der Geschichte [in German]. Tübingen: Konkursbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Sarenmalm, E.K., Thorén-Jönsson, A.L., Gaston-Johansson, F., et al. (2009). Making sense of living under the shadow of death: Adjusting to a recurrent breast cancer illness. Qualitative Health Research, 19(8), 1116–1130.Google Scholar
Scherer-Rath, M., van den Brand, J., van Straten, C., et al. (2012). Experience of contingency and congruence of interpretation of life-events in clinical psychiatric settings: A qualitative pilot study. Journal of Empirical Theology, 25(2), 127–152.Google Scholar
Sherman, A.C., Simonton, S., Latif, U., et al. (2005). Religious struggle and religious comfort in response to illness: Health outcomes among stem cell transplant patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28(4), 359–367.Google Scholar
Straub, J. (2005). Telling stories, making history: Toward a narrative psychology of the historical construction of meaning. In Narration, identity, and historical consciousness. Straub, J. (ed.), pp. 44–98. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Street, R.L. Jr., Gordon, H.S., Ward, M.M. et al. (2005). Patient participation in medical consultations: Why some patients are more involved than others. Medical Care, 43(10), 960–969.Google Scholar
Tarakeshwar, N., Vanderwerker, L.C., Paulk, E., et al. (2006). Religious coping is associated with the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(3), 646–657. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2504357/.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative analysis: Analysis types and software tools. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Tinsley, H.E.A. & Weiss, D.J. (2000). Interrater reliability and agreement. In Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Tinsley, H.E.A. & Weiss, D.J. (eds.), pp. 95–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Dalen, E.J., Scherer-Rath, M., Hermans, C.A.M., et al. (2012). Breaking the bad news: Experiences of contingency in advanced cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(Suppl. 15), e19560.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, R. & Cusveller, B. (2004). Nursing competencies for spiritual care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(3), 234–246.Google Scholar
van Uden, M.H.F., Pieper, J.Z.T., Van Eersel, J., et al. (2013). Post- or para-modern devotion in the Netherlands? In Constructs of meaning and religious transformation. Westerink, H. (ed.), pp. 239–258. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wolin, S. (2015). Foreword. In Play therapy interventions to enhance resilience. Crenshaw, D.A. et al. (eds.). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Wuchterl, K. (2011). Kontingenz oder das Andere der Vernunft. Zum Verhältnis von Philosophie, Natuurwissenschaft und Religion [in German]. [Contingency or the other-than reason: On the relationship between philosophy, science and religion]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar