Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:20:58.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“How I kept track of it of course was my business”: Cancer patient self-monitoring as self-stylized work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2013

Carol J. Hermansen-Kobulnicky  and
Mary Anne Purtzer
Carol J. Hermansen-Kobulnicky*
Affiliation:
School of Pharmacy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming
Mary Anne Purtzer
Affiliation:
Fay W. Whitney School of Nursing, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming
*
Address correspondence and reprint to requests to: Carol J. Hermansen-Kobulnicky, School of Pharmacy, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Avenue, Department 3375, Laramie, WY 82071-3375. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

Self-monitoring behaviors of cancer patients benefit patients, caregivers, and providers, and yet the phenomenon of self-monitoring from the cancer-patient perspective has not been studied. We examined cancer patients' self-monitoring preferences and practices, focusing on the meaning of self-monitoring within the cancer experience.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted among adult cancer patients who had been seen at least once at a rural United States cancer center. Questions sought out the meaning of self-monitoring and its practical aspects. Qualitative data were analyzed by adapting the four-stepped method by Giorgi for empirical phenomenological analysis.

Results:

Twenty participants were interviewed (11 women and 9 men). Transcribed interviews revealed that cancer patient self-monitoring is self-stylized work that ranges from simple to complex, while being both idiosyncratic and routine. Participants reported using tools with systems for use that fit their distinctive lives for the purpose of understanding and using information they deemed to be important in their cancer care. Three conceptual categories were discerned from the data that help to elucidate this self-stylized work as fitting their individual priorities and preferences, reflecting their identities, and being born of their work lives.

Significance of results:

Findings highlight patients' unique self-monitoring preferences and practices, calling into question the assumption that the sole use of standardized tools are the most effective approach to engaging patients in this practice. Self-monitoring efforts can be validated when providers welcome or adapt to patients' self-stylized tools and systems. Doing so may present opportunity for improved communications and patient-centered care.

Keywords

Self-monitoringOccupationPreferenceCancerSymptom monitoringSelf-management
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 12 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 355 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berry, D.L., Blumenstein, B.A., Halpenny, B., et al. (2011). Enhancing patient-provide communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: A randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 1029–1035.Google Scholar
Chewning, B. & Sleath, B. (1996). Medication decision-making and management: A client-centered model. Social Science & Medicine, 42, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Counting every moment. (2012, March 3). The Economist Newspaper Limited. http://www.economist.com/node/21548493 (December 2, 2012).Google Scholar
de Wit, R., van Dam, F., Hanneman, M., et al. (1999). Evaluation of the use of a pain diary in chronic cancer pain patients at home. Pain, 79,89–99.Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In Phenomenology and psychological research, Giorgi, A. (ed.). pp. 8–22. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Hermansen-Kobulnicky, C.J., Wiederholt, J.B. & Chewning, B. (2004). Adverse effect monitoring: Opportunity for patient care and pharmacy practice. Journal of the American Pharmacy Association, 44, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermansen-Kobulnicky, C.J. (2009). Symptom monitoring behaviors of rural cancer patients and survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17, 617–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, K. (2011). Adventures in self-surveillance, aka the quantified self, aka extreme navel-gazing. Forbes http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/04/07/adventures-in-self-surveillance-aka-the-quantified-self-aka-extreme-navel-gazing/ (December 2, 2012).Google Scholar
Hoekstra, J., de Vos, R., van Duijn, N.P., et al. (2006). Using the symptom monitor in a randomized controlled trial: The effect on symptom prevalence and severity. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31, 22–30.Google Scholar
Husson, O., Mols, F. & van de Poll-Franse, L.V. (2011). The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: A systematic review. Annals of Oncology, 22, 761–772.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Maunsell, E., Allard, P., Dorval, M., et al. (2000). A brief pain diary for ambulatory patients with advanced cancer: Acceptability and validity. Cancer, 88, 2387–2397.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaughan, E. & McKenna, H. (2007). Information-seeking behaviour of men newly diagnosed with cancer: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 2105–2113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Schumacher, K.L., Koresawa, S., West, C., et al. (2002). The usefulness of a daily pain management diary for outpatients with cancer-related pain. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29, 1304–1313.Google Scholar
Skalla, K.A., Bakitas, M., Furstenberg, C.T., et al. (2004). Patients' need for information about cancer therapy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31, 313–319.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.E. & Stajduhar, K.I. (2012). Patient perceptions of communications on the threshold of cancer survivorship: Implications for provider responses. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 6, 229–237.Google Scholar
Tucci, R.A. & Bartels, K.L. (1998). Patient use of the symptom reporting tool. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2, 97–99.Google Scholar
Vallières, I., Aubin, M., Blondeau, L., et al. (2006). Effectiveness of a clinical intervention in improving pain control in outpatients with cancer treated by radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology-Biology-Physics, 66, 234–237.Google Scholar
Wald, J. & McCormack, L. (2011). Patient empowerment and health information technology. White Paper prepared for Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society by RTI International.Google Scholar
Wilde, M.H. & Garvin, S. (2007). A concept analysis of self-monitoring. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2004). Integrated management of adolescent and adult illness team. In General principles of good chronic care: Interim guidelines for first-level facility health workers.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2011). Improving health care: Individual interventions. In Global status report on non-communicable disease 2010: Description of the global burden of NCDs, their risk factors and determinants.Google Scholar