Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T15:00:40.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining family meetings at end of life: The model of practice in a hospice inpatient unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2014

Mary Ann Meeker ,
Deborah P. Waldrop  and
Jin Young Seo
Mary Ann Meeker*
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo School of Nursing, Buffalo, New York
Deborah P. Waldrop
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo School of Social Work, Buffalo, New York
Jin Young Seo
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo School of Nursing, Buffalo, New York
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Mary Ann Meeker, University at Buffalo School of Nursing, 303 Wende Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14214. E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Our purpose was to rigorously examine the nature of family meetings as conducted in an inpatient hospice care unit in order to generate an inductive theoretical model.

Method:

In this two-phase project, we first interviewed eight members of the interdisciplinary care team who participated in multiple family meetings each week. Interview questions explored why and how they conducted family meetings. Using an observation template created from these interview data, we subsequently conducted ethnographic observations during family meetings. Using the methods of grounded theory, our findings were synthesized into a theoretical model depicting the structure and process of formal family meetings within this setting.

Results:

The core of the family meeting was characterized by cognitive and affective elements aimed at supporting the family and facilitating quality care by clarifying the past, easing the present, and protecting the future. This inductive model was subsequently found to be highly aligned with a sense of coherence, an important influence on coping, and adaptation to the stress of a life-limiting illness.

Significance of Results:

Provider communication with family members is particularly critical during advanced illness and end-of-life care. The National Consensus Project clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care list regular family meetings among the recommended practices for excellent communication during end-of-life care, but do not provide specific guidance on how and when to provide such meetings. Our findings provide a theoretical model that can inform the design of a family meeting to address family members' needs for meaningful and contextualized information, validation of their important contributions to care, and preparation for the patient's death.

Keywords

Family meetingGrounded theoryHospice careInpatient careStructured communication
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , October 2015 , pp. 1283 - 1291
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akiyama, A., Numata, K. & Mikami, H. (2010). Importance of end-of-life support to minimize caregiver's regret during bereavement of the elderly for better subsequent adaptation to bereavement. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 50(2), 175–178.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Billings, J.A. (2011). The end of life family meeting in intensive care, part I: Indications, outcomes, and family needs. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(9), 1042–1050.Google Scholar
Birks, M. & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Byock, I. (1996). The nature of suffering and the nature of opportunity at the end of life. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 12, 237–251.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Curtis, J.R., Patrick, D.L., Shannon, S.E., et al. (2001). The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Opportunities for improvement. Critical Care Medicine, 29(2), N26–N33. Available at http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Abstract/2001/02001/The_family_conference_as_a_focus_to_improve.6.aspx.Google Scholar
Curtis, J.R., Engelberg, R.A., Wenrich, M.D., et al. (2002). Studying communication about end of life care during the ICU family conference: Development of a framework. Journal of Critical Care, 17(3), 147–160.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. & Ridley, S. (2012). Uncertainty in end of life care and shared decision making. Critical Care and Resuscitation, 14(1), 81–87. Available at http://www.cicm.org.au/journal/2012/march/ccr_14_1_010312-081.pdf.Google Scholar
Gallagher, R. & Krawczyk, M. (2013). Family members' perceptions of end of life care across diverse locations of care. BMC Palliative Care, 12(1), 25. Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-684X/12/25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Hannon, B., O'Reilly, V., Bennett, K., et al. (2012). Meeting the family: Measuring effectiveness of family meetings in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit. Palliative & Supportive Care, 10, 43–49.Google Scholar
Hebert, R.S., Schulz, R., Copeland, V.C., et al. (2009). Preparing family caregivers for death and bereavement: Insights from caregivers of terminally ill patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
Hudson, P., Quinn, K., O'Hanlon, B., et al. (2008). Family meetings in palliative care: Multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines. BMC Palliative Care, 7, 12.Google Scholar
Hudson, P., Thomas, T., Quinn, K., et al. (2009). Family meetings in palliative care: Are they effective? Palliative Medicine, 23(2), 150–157.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Lucette, A. & Loscalzo, M. (2013). Bereavement needs of adults, children, and families after cancer. Cancer Journal, 19(5), 444–457.Google Scholar
Lautrette, A., Darmon, M., Megarbane, B., et al. (2007). A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(5), 469–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod-Sordjan, R. (2014). Death preparedness: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1008–1019.Google Scholar
Moneymaker, K. (2005). The family conference. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(1), 157.Google Scholar
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, 3rd ed. Pittsburgh: National Consensus Project.Google Scholar
Psirides, A.J. & Sturland, S. (2009). Withdrawal of active treatment in intensive care: What is stopped—comparison between belief and practice. Critical Care and Resuscitation, 11(3), 210–214. Available at http://www.cicm.org.au/journal/2009/september/ccr_11_2_010609-210_psirides.pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radwany, S., Albanese, T., Clough, L., et al. (2009). End of life decision making and emotional burden: Placing family meetings in context. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 26(5), 376–383.Google Scholar
Royak-Schaler, R., Gadalla, S., Lemkau, J., et al. (2006). Family perspectives on communication with healthcare providers during end-of-life cancer care. Oncology Nursing Forum, 33(4), 753–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, S.E., Long-Sutehall, T. & Coombs, M. (2011). Conversations in end-of-life care: Communication tools for critical care practitioners. Nursing in Critical Care, 16(3), 124–130.Google Scholar
Waldrop, D.P. & Meeker, M.A. (2014). Final decisions: How hospice enrollment prompts meaningful choices about life closure. Palliative & Supportive Care, 12, 211–221.Google Scholar
Weissman, D.E., Quill, T.E. & Arnold, R.M. (2010 a). The family meeting: Starting the conversation 223. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13(2), 204–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, D.E., Quill, T.E. & Arnold, R.M. (2010 b). Preparing for the family meeting 222. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13(2), 203–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt-Sherman, D. (1998). Reciprocal suffering: The need to improve caregivers' quality of life through palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 1(4), 357–366.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2007). Cancer control: Knowledge into action. Palliative care. Available at http://www.who.int/cancer/publications/cancer_control_palliative/en/.Google Scholar