Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:39:40.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effectiveness of caregiver social support is associated with cancer survivors' memories of stem cell transplantation: A linguistic analysis of survivor narratives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Christine Rini ,
Dane Emmerling ,
Jane Austin ,
Lisa M. Wu ,
Heiddis Valdimarsdottir ,
William H. Redd ,
Rebecca Woodruff  and
Rachel Warbet
Christine Rini*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Dane Emmerling
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Jane Austin
Affiliation:
William Paterson University, Wayne Township, New Jersey
Lisa M. Wu
Affiliation:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
Heiddis Valdimarsdottir
Affiliation:
Reykjavík University, Reykjavík, Iceland
William H. Redd
Affiliation:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
Rebecca Woodruff
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Rachel Warbet
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Sleepy Hollow, New York
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Christine Rini, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7440. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

People who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are highly dependent on their caregiver during their lengthy treatment and recovery. The effectiveness of their caregiver's social support can profoundly affect their day-to-day treatment experiences and, in turn, how they recall those experiences and are affected by them long after the treatment ends.

Method:

Our participants were 182 men and women who had undergone a transplant within the previous 9 months to 3 years. They completed baseline measures (including a measure of caregiver social support effectiveness) and then completed three writing assignments describing their transplant experiences. Linguistic analyses were conducted to investigate their use of words indicating negative emotions, cognitive processing (insight and causation), and practical problems with money and insurance. Theory-based hypotheses predicted associations between specific functional types of caregiver support (emotional, informational, and instrumental) and these word categories.

Results:

As hypothesized, the effectiveness of different functional types of support from a caregiver were uniquely associated with theoretically relevant categories of word use. Structural equation models indicated that more effective caregiver emotional support predicted lower use of negative emotion words; more effective caregiver informational support predicted lower use of causation words; and more effective caregiver instrumental support predicted lower use of words related to money and insurance.

Significance of results:

Our findings provide insights to guide research on the mechanisms through which caregiver support influences patient outcomes after stem cell transplantation. For instance, research suggests that these kinds of effects could have implications for survivors' current self-concept, psychosocial functioning, and meaning-making.

Keywords

SurvivorshipOncologyNarrativeCaregiverSocial support
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , December 2015 , pp. 1735 - 1744
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrykowski, M.A., Cordova, M.J., Hann, D.M., et al. (1999). Patients' psychosocial concerns following stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 24, 1121–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, N.K., Finney Rutten, L.J., Gustafson, D.H., et al. (2007). Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 474–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bantum, E.O.C. & Owen, J.E. (2009). Evaluating the validity of computerized content analysis programs for identification of emotional expression in cancer narratives. Psychological Assessment, 21, 79–88.Google Scholar
Barrera, M. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. (2008). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T., et al. (2005). A tale of three functions: The self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 23, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A. & Kessler, R.C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.Google Scholar
Carroll, D.W. (2009). Cognitive and emotional language use in parents of children with developmental disabilities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 15, 88–95.Google Scholar
Conway, M.A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutrona, C.E. (1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 3–14.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C.E., Shaffer, P.A., Wesner, K.A., et al. (2007). Optimally matching support and perceived spousal sensitivity. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 754–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, L.R. (1993). BSI Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual, 4th ed. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Fife, B.L., Huster, G.A., Cornetta, K.G., et al. (2000). Longitudinal study of adaptation to the stress of bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 1539–1549.Google Scholar
Fisher, J.D., Nadler, A. & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 27–54.Google Scholar
Giesbrecht, M., Wolse, F., Crooks, V.A., et al. (2013). Identifying socio-environmental factors that facilitate resilience among Canadian palliative family caregivers: A qualitative case study. Palliative & Supportive Care, 11, 1–11. Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
Gleason, M.E., Iida, M., Bolger, N., et al. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, J.G., Wu, L.M., Austin, J.E., et al. (2013). Economic survivorship stress is associated with poor health-related quality of life among distressed survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Psycho-Oncology, 22, 911–921.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N. & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.Google Scholar
Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Joshua, T.V., Rizzo, J.D., Zhang, M.-J., et al. (2010). Access to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cancer, 116, 3469–3476.Google Scholar
Lepore, S.J. (2001). A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In Psychosocial interventions for cancer. Baum, A. & Andersen, B.L. (eds.), pp. 99–118. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
McQuellon, R.P. & Andrykowski, M.A. (2009). Psychosocial issues in hematopoietic cell transplantation. In Thomas' hematopoietic cell transplantation. Appelbaum, F. et al. (eds.), pp. 139–150. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
McQuellon, R.P., Russell, G.B., et al. (1997). Quality of life measurement in bone marrow transplantation: Development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT–BMT) scale. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 19, 357–368.Google Scholar
Mosher, C.E., Lepore, S.J., Wu, L., et al. (2012). Social correlates of distress following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Exploring the role of loneliness and cognitive processing. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 1022–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newsom, J.T., Rook, K.S., Nishishiba, M., et al. (2005). Understanding the relative importance of positive and negative social exchanges: Examining specific domains and appraisals. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60, P304–P312.Google Scholar
Park, C.L., Edmondson, D., Fenster, J.R., et al. (2008). Meaning-making and psychological adjustment following cancer: The mediating roles of growth, life meaning, and restored just-world beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 863–875.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W. & Beall, S.K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennebaker, J.W. & Chung, C.K. (2011). Expressive writing and its links to mental and physical health. In Oxford handbook of health psychology. Friedman, H.S. (ed.), pp. 417–437. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R. & Niederhoffer, K.G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language. use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Ireland, M., et al. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.Google Scholar
Rini, C. & Dunkel Schetter, C. (2010). The effectiveness of social support transactions in intimate relationships. In Support processes in intimate relationships. Sullivan, K.T. & Davila, J. (eds.), pp. 26–67. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rini, C., Schetter, C.D., Hobel, C.J., et al. (2006). Effective social support: Antecedents and consequences of partner support during pregnancy. Personal Relationships, 13, 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rini, C., Redd, W.H., Austin, J., et al. (2011). Effectiveness of partner social support predicts enduring psychological distress after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 64–74.Google Scholar
Rini, C., Austin, J., Wu, L.M., et al. (2014). Harnessing benefits of helping others: A randomized controlled trial testing Expressive Helping to address survivorship problems after hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Health Psychology, 33, 1541–1551.Google Scholar
Scheier, M.F., Wrosch, C., Baum, A., et al. (2006). The Life Engagement Test. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syrjala, K.L., Langer, S., Abrams, J., et al. (2004). Physical and mental recovery after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Discovery Medicine, 4, 263–269.Google Scholar
Thoits, P.A. (1985). Social support and psychological well-being: Theoretical possibilities. In Social support: Theory, research and application. Sarason, I.G. & Sarason, B.R. (eds.), pp. 51–72. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Thoits, P.A. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416–423.Google Scholar