Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:04:41.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory–II in patients with advanced cancer: A theory-driven approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Kristen G. Tobias ,
Jonathan Lehrfeld ,
Barry Rosenfeld ,
Hayley Pessin  and
William Breitbart
Kristen G. Tobias*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York
Jonathan Lehrfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York
Barry Rosenfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York
Hayley Pessin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
William Breitbart
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kristen G. Tobias, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, New York 10458. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The diagnosis and treatment of depression are complicated by the presence of a serious medical illness, such as cancer. The role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of depression remains unknown; however, the symptom cluster of sickness behavior is more clearly related to inflammation. Symptom clusters may provide the specificity needed to improve treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study is to use confirmatory factor analysis to examine the construct of sickness behavior in patients with advanced cancer using the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI–II).

Method:

Patients (N = 167) were recruited from chemotherapy clinics and the Department of Psychiatry at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Symptoms were a priori delineated using the factor labels sickness behavior and negative affectivity (two-factor model), and affective, cognitive, and sickness behavior (three-factor model). These data were also fit for a more traditional model using affective, cognitive, and somatic factors.

Results:

The mean total BDI–II score was 14.74 (SD = 8.52; range = 1–46). Fit statistics for all models were good, but the novel three-factor model with sickness behavior provided the best fit: χ2(186) = 273.624; p < 0.001; root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.053; comparative fit index = 0.949.

Significance of results:

Both the two- and three-factor models provide support for the unique construct of sickness behavior in patients with advanced cancer. High factor correlations with the BDI–II and other measures of distress were observed, which raises questions about theoretically distinct, but related, constructs.

Keywords

CancerDepressionSickness behaviorSymptom clustersBeck Depression Inventory–II
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 704 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Arnau, R.C., Meagher, M.W., Norris, M.P., et al. (2001). Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with primary care medical patients. Health Psychology, 20(2), 112–119.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., et al. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(6), 861–865.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A. & Brown, G.K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A.A., Haug, T.T., et al. (2002). The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52(2), 69–77.Google Scholar
Brothers, B.M., Yang, H.C., Strunk, D.R., et al. (2011). Cancer patients with major depressive disorder: Testing a biobehavioral/cognitive behavior intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(2), 253–260.Google Scholar
Brouwer, D., Meijer, R.R. & Zevalkink, J. (2013). On the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory–II: G is the key. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 136–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, T.C., Parker, J.D. & Heggie, J. (2001). A psychometric evaluation of the BDI–II in treatment-seeking substance abusers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20(3), 197–204.Google Scholar
Charlton., B.G. (2000). The malaise theory of depression: Major depressive disorder is sickness behavior and antidepressants are analgesic. Medical Hypotheses, 54(1), 126–130.Google Scholar
Dantzer, R. & Kelley, K.W. (2007). Twenty years of research on cytokine-induced sickness behavior. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 21(2), 153–160.Google Scholar
Frankl, V.E. (1969). The Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications of Logotherapy. New York: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hall, B.J., Hood, M.M., Nackers, L.M., et al. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory–II in bariatric surgery candidates. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 294–299.Google Scholar
Harris, C.A. & D'Eon, J.L. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory–Second Edition (BDI–II) in individuals with chronic pain. Pain, 137(3), 609–622.Google Scholar
Hart, B.L. (1988). Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 12(2), 123–137.Google Scholar
Hopko, D.R., Armento, M.E., Robertson, S.M., et al. (2011). Brief behavioral activation and problem-solving therapy for depressed breast cancer patients: Randomized trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(6), 834–849.Google Scholar
Huang, C. & Chen, J.H. (2015). Meta-analysis of the factor structures of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Assessment, 22(4), 459–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebber, A.M., Buffart, L.M., Kleijn, G., et al. (2014). Prevalence of depression in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of diagnostic interviews and self-report instruments. Psycho-Oncology, 23(2), 121–130.Google Scholar
Lie, H.C., Hjermstad, M.J., Fayers, P., et al. (2015). Depression in advanced cancer: Assessment challenges and associations with disease load. Journal of Affective Disorders, 173, 176–184.Google Scholar
McDaniel, J.S., Musselman, D.L., Porter, M.R., et al. (1995). Depression in patients with cancer: Diagnosis, biology, and treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52(2), 89–99.Google Scholar
Miaskowski, C., Dodd, M. & Lee, K. (2004). Symptom clusters: The new frontier in symptom management research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, no. 32, 17–21.Google Scholar
Mystakidou, K., Parpa, E., Tsilika, E., et al. (2008). The experience of hopelessness in a population of Greek cancer patients receiving palliative care. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54(3), 262–271.Google Scholar
Nissim, R., Gagliese, L. & Rodin, G. (2009). The desire for hastened death in individuals with advanced cancer: A longitudinal qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine, 69(2), 165–171.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. & Duberstein, P.R. (2010). Depression and cancer mortality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 40(11), 1797–1810.Google Scholar
Raison, C.L. & Miller, A.H. (2003). Depression in cancer: New developments regarding diagnosis and treatment. Biological Psychiatry, 54(3), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, B., Breitbart, W., Stein, K., et al. (1999). Measuring desire for death among patients with HIV/AIDS: The schedule of attitudes toward hastened death. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(1), 94–100.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, B., Breitbart, W., Galietta, M., et al. (2000). The schedule of attitudes toward hastened death: Measuring desire for death in terminally ill cancer patients. Cancer, 88(12), 2868–2875.Google Scholar
Segal, D.L., Coolidge, F.L., Cahill, B.S., et al. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI–II) among community-dwelling older adults. Behavior Modification, 32(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Shattuck, E.C. & Muehlenbein, M.P. (2016). Towards an integrative picture of human sickness behavior. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 57, 255–262.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K. & Williams, J.B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME–MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. The Journal of the American Medical Association , 282(18), 1737–1744.Google Scholar
Steer, R.A., Ball, R., Ranieri, W.F., et al. (1999). Dimensions of the Beck Depression Inventory–II in clinically depressed outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 117–128.Google Scholar
Vodermaier, A., Linden, W. & Siu, C. (2009). Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: A systematic review of assessment instruments. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101(21), 1464–1488.Google Scholar
Zigmond, A.S. & Snaith, R.P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.Google Scholar