Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:58:24.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The challenges of ethical deliberation in palliative care settings: A descriptive study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2021

Serge Dumont ,
Véronique Turcotte Open the ORCID record for Véronique Turcotte [Opens in a new window] ,
Michèle Aubin ,
Lynn Casimiro ,
Mireille Lavoie  and
Louise Picard
Serge Dumont*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Criminology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada VITAM-Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec City, QC, Canada Laval University Cancer Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Véronique Turcotte
Affiliation:
Laval University Cancer Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Michèle Aubin
Affiliation:
VITAM-Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec City, QC, Canada Laval University Cancer Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Lynn Casimiro
Affiliation:
La Cité Collégiale, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Mireille Lavoie
Affiliation:
Laval University Cancer Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Louise Picard
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Criminology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada Laval University Cancer Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Serge Dumont, School of Social Work and Criminology, Pavillon Charles-de-Koninck, Laval University, 1030, av. des Sciences-Humaines, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Inadequate deliberation processes about ethical problems occurring in palliative care settings may negatively impact both patients and healthcare professionals. Better knowledge of the palliative care professionals’ practices regarding such processes could help identify specific education needs to improve the quality of palliative care in the context of complex ethical situations. Therefore, this descriptive study aimed to (1) examine ethical deliberation processes in interprofessional teams in five palliative care settings; (2) identify organizational factors that constrain such processes; and (3) based on this knowledge, identify priority education needs for future and current palliative care professionals.

Method

The study involved three data collection activities: (1) direct observation of simulated interprofessional ethical deliberations in various palliative care settings; (2) individual semi-structured interviews; and (3) deliberative dialogues.

Results

Thirty-six healthcare professionals took part in the simulated ethical deliberations and in the deliberative dialogue activities, and 13 were met in an individual interview. The study results revealed suboptimal interprofessional collaboration and ethical deliberation competencies, particularly regarding awareness of the ethical issue under consideration, clarification of conflicting values, reasonable decision making, and implementation planning. Participants also reported facing serious organizational constraints that challenged ethical deliberation processes.

Significance of results

This study confirmed the need for professional education in interprofessional collaboration and ethical deliberation so that palliative care professionals can adequately face current and future ethical challenges. It also enabled the identification of educational priorities in this regard. Future research should focus on identifying promising educational activities, assessing their effectiveness, and measuring their impact on patient and family experience and the quality of palliative care.

Keywords

Decision makingEducationEthicsInterprofessional collaborationPalliative care
Type
Original Article
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 212 - 220
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boisvert, Y, Jutras, M, Legault, GA, et al. (2003) Petit manuel d’éthique appliquée à la gestion publique. Montréal: Éditions Liber.Google Scholar
Bollig, G, Schmidt, G, Rosland, JH, et al. (2015) Ethical challenges in nursing homes – Staff's opinions and experiences with systematic ethics meetings with participation of residents’ relatives. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 29(4), 810–823. doi:10.1111/scs.12213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyko, JA, Lavis, JN, Abelson, J, et al. (2012) Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Social Science & Medicine 75(11), 1938–1945. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Careau, E, Vincent, C and Swaine, BR (2014) Observed interprofessional collaboration (OIPC) during interdisciplinary team meetings: Development and validation of a tool in a rehabilitation setting. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education 4(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, TY, Hu, WY, Huang, HL, et al. (2009) Prevailing ethical dilemmas in terminal care for patients with cancer in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Oncology 27(24), 3964–3968. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, E, White, BP, Willmott, L, et al. (2019) Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics 45(6), 373–379. doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curran, V, Casimiro, L, Banfield, V, et al. (2010) Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric. St. John: Memorial University of Newfoundland, Faculty of Medicine.Google Scholar
Daher, M (2013) Ethical issues in the geriatric patient with advanced cancer ‘living to the end’. Annals of Oncology 24(Suppl 7), vii55–vii58. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, H, Andersson, G, Olsson, L, et al. (2014) Ethical dilemmas around the dying patient with stroke: A qualitative interview study with team members on stroke units in Sweden. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 46(3), 162–170. doi:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giddens, A (1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, 1st ed. Paris: UC Press.Google Scholar
Gracia, D (2003) Ethical case deliberation and decision making. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 6(3), 227–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granda-Cameron, C and Houldin, A (2012) Concept analysis of good death in terminally ill patients. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 29(8), 632–639. doi:10.1177/1049909111434976CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemberg, J and Bergdahl, E (2019) Ethical sensitivity and perceptiveness in palliative home care through co-creation. Nursing Ethics 27(2), 446–460. doi:10.1177/0969733019849464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermsen, M and ten Have, H (2005) Decision-making in palliative care practice and the need for moral deliberation: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling 56(3), 268–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez-Marrero, P, Pereira, SM, Carvalho, AS, et al. (2016) Ethical decisions in palliative care: Interprofessional relations as a burnout protective factor? Results from a mixed-methods multicenter study in Portugal. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 33(8), 723–732. doi:10.1177/1049909115583486CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyland, DK, Tranmer, J, O'Callaghan, CJ, et al. (2003) The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end-of-life decision making? Journal of Critical Care 18(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irvine, R, Kerridge, I and McPhee, J (2004) Towards a dialogical ethics of interprofessionalism. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 50(4), 278–280.Google ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, M, Roxberg, A, da Silva, AB, et al. (2010) Community nurses’ experiences of ethical dilemmas in palliative care: A Swedish study. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 16(5), 224–231. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.5.48143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legault, GA (1999) Professionnalisme et délibération éthique: Manuel d'aide à la décision responsable. Québec: Presse de l'Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Mehlis, K, Bierwirth, E, Laryionava, K, et al. (2018) High prevalence of moral distress reported by oncologists and oncology nurses in end-of-life decision making. Psycho-Oncology 27(12), 2733–2739. doi:10.1002/pon.4868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mucchielli, A (1996) Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin/Masson.Google Scholar
Nelson, S, Turnbull, J, Bainbridge, L, et al. (2014) Optimizing Scopes of Practice: New Models for a New Health Care System. Ottawa: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences.Google Scholar
Ong, WY, Yee, CM and Lee, A (2012) Ethical dilemmas in the care of cancer patients near the end of life. Singapore Medical Journal 53(1), 11–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Oxford University (ed.) (2019) Lexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piers, RD, Van den Eynde, M, Steeman, E, et al. (2012) End-of-life care of the geriatric patient and nurses’ moral distress. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 13(1), 80.e7–80.e13. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piot, E, Leheup, BF, Goetz, C, et al. (2015) Caregivers confronted with the withdrawal of artificial nutrition at the end of life: Prevalence of and reasons for experienced difficulties. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 32(7), 732–737. doi:10.1177/1049909114539037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranganathan, A, Gunnarsson, O and Casarett, D (2014) Palliative care and advance care planning for patients with advanced malignancies. Annals of Palliative Medicine 3(3), 144–149. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2014.07.04Google ScholarPubMed
Steiner, JM, Patton, KK, Prutkin, JM, et al. (2018) Moral distress at the end of a life: When family and clinicians do not agree on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator deactivation. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 55(2), 530–534. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, C, Ribeiro, O, Fonseca, AM, et al. (2014) Ethical decision making in intensive care units: A burnout risk factor? Results from a multicentre study conducted with physicians and nurses. Journal of Medical Ethics 40(2), 97–103. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine-Health and Medicine Division (2014) Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington: The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine-Health and Medicine Division.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dumont et al. supplementary material

Appendix S1

Download Dumont et al. supplementary material(File)
File 33.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dumont et al. supplementary material

Appendix S2

Download Dumont et al. supplementary material(File)
File 726.5 KB