Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T21:36:00.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance in the Cancer Experience (PEACE) questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2021

Masako Okamura ,
Maiko Fujimori Open the ORCID record for Maiko Fujimori [Opens in a new window] ,
Kotone Hata ,
Masanori Mori ,
Jennifer W. Mack ,
Holly G. Prigerson  and
Yosuke Uchitomi
Masako Okamura
Affiliation:
Division of Behavioral Science Research, Behavioral Sciences and Survivorship Research Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan Innovation Center for Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Care, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Maiko Fujimori*
Affiliation:
Division of Behavioral Science Research, Behavioral Sciences and Survivorship Research Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan Innovation Center for Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Care, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan Department of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan
Kotone Hata
Affiliation:
Division of Behavioral Science Research, Behavioral Sciences and Survivorship Research Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan Department of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan
Masanori Mori
Affiliation:
Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
Jennifer W. Mack
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
Holly G. Prigerson
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
Yosuke Uchitomi
Affiliation:
Division of Behavioral Science Research, Behavioral Sciences and Survivorship Research Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan Innovation Center for Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Care, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Maiko Fujimori, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance in the Cancer Experience questionnaire (PEACE-J) and to evaluate the association between the PEACE subscales and Japanese patient characteristics.

Methods

A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among 412 patients with cancer. This survey assessed medical and demographic factors, such as the PEACE, the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy — Spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp). The forward–backward translation method was used to develop the PEACE-J. The validity of PEACE-J was evaluated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation analysis between each subscale of PEACE and FACIT-Sp and CISS. The Cronbach's α and the item-total correlation of each subscale of the PEACE questionnaire were calculated to assess internal consistency reliability.

Results

The factor analysis yielded two subscales corresponding to the original version: Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.84 and 0.86 for the Peaceful Acceptance of Illness subscale and the Struggle with Illness subscale, respectively. The PEACE subscales and the FACIT-Sp subscales and the CISS subscales were moderately associated with each other, including the Peaceful Acceptance to each subscale of FACIT (r = 0.22–0.55, p < 0.01); and the Peaceful Acceptance and the Struggle with Illness to CISS emotion-oriented coping (r = −0.36 and r = 0.45, p < 0.01, respectively). Married patients showed higher levels of peaceful acceptance than unmarried patients (p < 0.001). Poorer performance status, chemotherapy use, and recurrence or metastasis were significantly associated with higher levels of struggle with illness (p < 0.001).

Significance of results

This study indicated that the PEACE-J is a valid and reliable measure of the patient's sense of acceptance, calmness or equanimity, and peace, as well as their sense of struggle or desperation concerning their illness.

Keywords

Cognitive acceptanceEnd-of-life discussionPeacefulnessPsychometric properties
Type
Original Article
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , August 2022 , pp. 549 - 555
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

An, AW, Ladwig, S, Epstein, RM, et al. (2020) The impact of the caregiver-oncologist relationship on caregiver experiences of end-of-life care and bereavement outcomes. Supportive Care in Cancer 28, 4219–4225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernacki, R, Paladino, J, Neville, BA, et al. (2019) Effect of the serious illness program in outpatient oncology: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 179, 751–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endler, NS and Parker, JDA (1990) Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS): Manual. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Enzinger, AC, Zhang, B, Schrag, D, et al. (2015) Outcomes of prognostic disclosure: Associations with prognostic understanding, distress and relationship with physician among patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 33, 3809–3816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, P, Castaneda, SF, Dale, J, et al. (2014) Spiritual well-being and depressive symptoms among cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer 22, 2393–2400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamijo, Y and Miyamura, T (2020) Spirituality and associated factors among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Japan Journal of Nursing Science 17, e12276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, JW, Nilsson, M, Balboni, T, et al. (2008) Peace, equanimity and acceptance in the cancer experience (PEACE): Validation of a scale to assess acceptance and struggle with terminal illness. Cancer 112, 2509–2517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyashita, M, Sanjo, M, Morita, T, et al. (2007) Good death in cancer: A nationwide quantitative study. Annals of Oncology 18, 1090–1097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, M, Fujimori, M, Ishiki, H, et al. (2019) Adding a wider range and “hope for the best, and prepare for the worst” statement: Preferences of patients with cancer for prognostic communication. Oncologist 24, e943–e952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noguchi, W, Ohno, T, Morita, S, et al. (2004) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual (FACIT-Sp) for Japanese patients with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer 12, 240–245.Google ScholarPubMed
Peterman, AH, Fitchett, G, Brady, MJ, et al. (2002) Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy – spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine 24, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, A, Block, AD, Friedlander, RJ, et al. (2006) Peaceful awareness in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine 9, 1359–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secinti, E, Tometich, DB, Johns, SA, et al. (2019) The relationship between acceptance of cancer and distress: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review 71, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinhauser, KE, Christakis, NA, Clip, EC, et al. (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. Journal of the American Medical Association 284, 2476–2482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, ST, Chang, WC, Chen, JS, et al. (2016) Associations of prognostic awareness/acceptance with psychological distress, existential suffering, and quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients’ last year of life. Psycho-Oncology 25, 455–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, ST, Chou, WC, Chang, WC, et al. (2019) Courses of change in good emotional preparedness for death and accurate prognostic awareness and their associations with psychological distress and quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients’ last year of life. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 58, 623–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, K, Yokoyama, K and Furukawa, TA (2015) Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for adults for stressful situations in healthy people. Psychological Reports 116, 447–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, AA, Zhang, B, Ray, A, et al. (2008) Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association 300, 1665–1673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed