Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:22:07.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Difficulties in screening for adjustment disorder, Part I: Use of existing screening instruments in cancer patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2004

KENNETH L. KIRSH ,
JOHN H. McGREW ,
MICHAEL DUGAN  and
STEVEN D. PASSIK
KENNETH L. KIRSH
Affiliation:
Symptom Management and Palliative Care Program, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
JOHN H. McGREW
Affiliation:
Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana
MICHAEL DUGAN
Affiliation:
Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation, St. Francis Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana
STEVEN D. PASSIK
Affiliation:
Symptom Management and Palliative Care Program, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: Although success rates for bone marrow transplantation (BMT) continue to improve, there is still a high level of morbidity and physical and emotional distress associated with BMT. To date, limited research has focused on the assessment of and screening for specific psychiatric disorders of patients facing BMT. This is especially true with regard to identifying adjustment disorder (AD), despite the fact that AD is the most prevalent psychiatric diagnosis in cancer patients.

Methods: A sample of 95 BMT patients were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (SCID) and completed several commonly used self-report instruments to determine if these tools could be used to identify patients with adjustment disorder in need of further assessment and intervention.

Results: Of these patients, 34.7% were diagnosed with adjustment disorder, 11.6% with major depression, and 5.3% with generalized anxiety disorder. The instruments were not found to be predictive of AD. However, the results of a regression analysis showed that the Social Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (R2 Δ = 0.04, F = 4.30, p < 0.05) was a significant predictor of adjustment disorder.

Significance of results: We conclude that there is little efficacy in using existing scales for detecting adjustment disorders in cancer patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, and that other tools for identifying patients with adjustment disorder who might benefit from counseling are needed.

Keywords

Adjustment disorderScreeningBone marrow transplant
Type
Research Article
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 23 - 31
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J., Coyne, L., & Console, D. (1996). Dissociation contributes to anxiety and psychoticism on the brief symptom inventory. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 184, 639–644.Google Scholar
American Society of Psychosocial and Behavioral Oncology/AIDS (1999). Standards of Care for the Management of Distress in Patients with Cancer. New York: Author.
Andreasen, N. & Hoenk, P. (1982). The predictive value of adjustment disorders: A follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 584–590.Google Scholar
Angst, J. & Dobler-Mikola, A. (1984). The Zurich study II: The continuum from normal to pathological depressive mood swings. European Archives of Psychiatry and the Neurological Sciences, 234, 21–29.Google Scholar
Boulet, J. & Boss, M. (1991). Reliability and validity of the brief symptom inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 433–437.Google Scholar
Brady, M., Cella, D., Mo, & F., et al. (1997). Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy breast quality of life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15, 974–986.Google Scholar
Broday, S. & Mason, J. (1991). Internal consistency of the brief symptom inventory for counseling-center clients. Psychological Reports, 68, 94.Google Scholar
Brystritsky, A., Linn, L., & Ware, J. (1990). Development of a multidimensional scale of anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 4, 99–115.Google Scholar
Cella, D., Bonomi, A., Lloyd, & S., et al. (1995). Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer, 12, 199–220.Google Scholar
Cella, D., Tulsky, D., Gray, & G., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570–579.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L. & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L., Morrow, G., & Fetting, J. (1983). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA, 249, 751–757.Google Scholar
Dugan, W., McDonald, M., Passik, & S., et al. (1998). Use of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in cancer patients: Feasibility as a screening tool. Psycho-Oncology, 7, 483–493.Google Scholar
Gabrys, J. & Peters, K. (1985). Reliability, discriminant and predictive validity of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. Psychological Reports, 57, 1091–1096.Google Scholar
Gawronski, I. & Privette, G. (1997). Empathy and reactive depression. Psychological Reports, 80, 1043–1050.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, P. & Joseph, S. (1995). Factor analysis of the impact of events scale with female bank staff following an armed raid. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 773–775.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of events scale: A measure of subjective distress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.Google Scholar
Katon, W. & Sullivan, M. (1990). Depression and chronic medical illness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 3–11.Google Scholar
Kirsh, K.L., Passik, S., Holtsclaw, & E., et al. (2001). I get tired for no reason: A single item screening for cancer related fatigue. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 22, 931–937.Google Scholar
Lopez, A. & Gomez-Jarabo, G. (2000). A model of therapeutic action in panic disorders. European Journal of Psychology, 14, 42–51.Google Scholar
Maddock, R., Carter, C., Tavano-Hall, & L., et al. (1998). Hypocapnia associated with cardiac stress scintigraphy in chest pain patients with panic disorder. Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 52–55.Google Scholar
Mavissakalian, M., Hamann, M., Haidar, & S., et al. (1995). Correlates of DSM-III personality disorder in generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 9, 103–115.Google Scholar
Neitzert, C., Ritvo, P., Dancey, & J., et al. (1998). The psychosocial impact of bone marrow transplantation: A review of the literature. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 22, 409–422.Google Scholar
Passik, S.D., Kirsh, K.L., Donaghy, & K., et al. (2001). An attempt to employ the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale as a lab test to trigger follow-up in ambulatory oncology clinics: Criterion validity and detection. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 21, 273–281.Google Scholar
Passik, S.D., Lundberg, J.C., Rosenfeld, & B., et al. (2000). Factor analysis of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in a large ambulatory oncology sample. Psychosomatics, 41, 121–127.Google Scholar
Pollin, I. & Holland, J. (1992). A model for counseling the medically ill: The Linda Pollin Foundation Approach. General Hospital Psychiatry, 14, 11–24.Google Scholar
Razavi, D., Delvaux, N., & Farvacques, C. (1990). Screening for adjustment disorders and major depressive disorders in cancer patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 79–83.Google Scholar
Segal, D., Hersen, M., & Van Hasselt, V. (1994). Reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R: An evaluative review. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 35, 316–327.Google Scholar
Sifneos, P. (1989). Brief dynamic and crisis therapy. In Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th ed., Kaplan, H. & Sadock, B. (eds.), vol. 2, pp. 1562–1567. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Skre, I., Onstad, S., Torgersen, & S., et al. (1991). High interrater reliability for the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R axis I (SCID-I). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 84, 167–173.Google Scholar
Steinberg, M. (1994). Interviewer's Guide to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
Strain, J. (1998). Adjustment disorders. In Psycho-oncology, Holland, J. (ed.), pp. 509–517. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tate, D., Forchheimer, M., Maynard, & F., et al. (1993). Comparing two measures of depression in spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 38, 53–61.Google Scholar
Winstead-Fry, P. & Schultz, A. (1997). Psychometric analysis of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) scale in a rural sample. Cancer, 79, 2446–2452.Google Scholar
Wise, M. (1994). Adjustment disorders and impulse disorders not otherwise classified. In The American psychiatric press textbook of psychiatry, 2nd ed., Talbot, J., Hales, R. & Yudofsky, S. (eds.), Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Wood, W. (1982). An attempt to validate the psychoticism scale of the brief symptom inventory. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 55, 367–373.Google Scholar
Yellen, S., Cella, D., Webster, & K., et al. (1997). Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT-G) measurement system. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13, 63–74.Google Scholar
Zabora, J. (1998). Screening procedures for psychosocial distress. In Psycho-oncology, Holland, J. (ed.), pp. 653–661. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zabora, J., Smith-Wilson, R., Fetting, & J., et al. (1990). An efficient method for psychosocial screening of cancer patients. Psychosomatics, 31, 192–196.Google Scholar
Zung, W. (1967a). Depression in the normal aged. Psychosomatics, 7, 287–292.Google Scholar
Zung, W. (1967b). Factors influencing the self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 543–547.Google Scholar
Zung, W. (1971). A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics, 12, 371–379.Google Scholar