Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:33:44.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional and Individual Orphaned Collections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Julia Golden
Julia Golden*
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Get access

Extract

“ORPHAN” IS AN incongruous word to apply to something dead for millions of years. But there is no better term to describe the state of an invertebrate paleontology collection whose guardian can no longer care for it. The numbers of specimens in invertebrate fossil collections do not set them apart from other natural history collections; however, add weight and volume, and it is obvious why adopting these orphans pose special problems. The workshop coordinators divided the discussion of orphaned collections into those held by industry and governmental agencies (see Allmon, Chapter 4, this volume) and those housed by institutions and individuals addressed here. Topics discussed at this session of the workshop included: the definitions of orphaned and endangered collections, why collections become orphans, which collections are most vulnerable, and what, if anything, can be done to prevent orphaned collections in the future. I have attempted to present an objective report of the discussions and proposed suggestions, but my bias as curator of a collection housed within an academic department may have crept in.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 10: Guidelines for the Management and Curation of Invertebrate Fossil Collections including a Data Model and Standards for Computerization , 2000 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cato, P.S. and Williams, S.L. 1993. Guidelines for developing policies for the management and care of natural history collections. Collection Forum 9(2):84–107.Google Scholar
Cato, P.S., Waller, R.R., Sharp, L., Simmons, J. and Williams, S.L. 1996. Developing staff resources for managing collections, 71 pp., The Canadian Museum of Nature and the Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville, VA.Google Scholar
Flessa, K.W. 1998a. Paleontology in academia: recent trends and future opportunities. Priscum 8(1):1–4.Google Scholar
Flessa, K.W. 1998b. Paleontology in academia II: the source and academic age of U.S. paleontologists. Priscum 8(2):1–4.Google Scholar
Glenister, B.F. (Chairman). 1977. Fossil invertebrates - Collections in North American repositories 1976. A report of the Paleontological Society Ad Hoc Committee on North American Resources in Invertebrate Paleontology (CONARIP). The University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
Golden, J. 1987. What has thousands of pieces, weighs hundreds of tons and can't take care of itself? A paleontology collection. Geoscience Information Society, Proceedings 18:67–80.Google Scholar
Hoagland, K.E. (Editor). 1994. Guidelines for institutional policies & planning in natural history collections, 120 pp., Association of Systematic Collections, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Museums & Galleries Commission. 1993. 3. Standards in the museum care of geological collections, 57 pp., Museums & Galleries Commission, London.Google Scholar
West, R.M. 1988. Endangered and orphaned natural history and anthropology collections in the United States and Canada. Collection Forum 4(2):65–74.Google Scholar