Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:27:19.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confronting and Correcting Misconceptions in Paleontology Through Use of the Conceptual Change Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Diane Schmidt  and
Michael Savarese
Diane Schmidt
Affiliation:
Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Culture, College of Education, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida 33965 USA
Michael Savarese
Affiliation:
Department of Marine and Ecological Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida 33965 USA
Get access

Abstract

The Conceptual Change Model (CCM) is an instructional approach that helps students learn by deliberately targeting their misconceptions. The teaching of such paleontological topics as evolution, phylogenetics, and functional morphology—three concept-rich units that are components of any paleontology course—is confounded by ingrained misunderstandings. The inquiry-based CCM was developed to take into account current theories of brain function. It fully supports the National Research Council's standards for inquiry and follows their recommendations for teaching science. The CCM instructional process allows students to: identify their own preconceptions, recognize the wide variety of beliefs held by classmates, confront their misconceptions, revise and reconstruct their ideas, apply their knowledge, and, finally, ask new questions for further study and growth. Implementation of the model provides a socially safe and challenging environment that engages students in ways not possible in traditional lecture settings. The CCM is employed in the upper-division course in paleontology at Florida Gulf Coast University. The principles of the paleontology course supports our marine science, environmental studies, and biology undergraduate programs. At the introduction of each topical unit, a short inquiry-based exercise is implemented both to reveal preconceptions carried by the students and to demonstrate the inconsistencies and problems with those conceptions. This then provides an opportunity to cleanly present the correct rendition of the concept.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 12: Teaching Paleontology in the 21st Century , 2012 , pp. 155 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dietl, G. P., and Flessa, K. W. 2011. Conservation paleobiology: putting the dead to work. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26:30–37.Google Scholar
Foote, M., and Miller, A. I. 2007. Principles of Paleontology. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205:581–598.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Vrba, E. S. 1982. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8:4–15.Google Scholar
Gredler, M. E. 2004. Learning and Instruction: Theory Into Practice (third edition). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1996. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (expanded edition). Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.), The National Academies Press, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2005. How Students Learn History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. Donovan, M. S. and Bransford, J. D. (eds.). The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
National Science Teachers Association. 2001. College Pathways to the National Science Education Standards. Siebert, E. D. and McIntosh, W. J. (eds.). NSTA Press, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
National Science Teachers Association. 2005. Exemplary Science: Best Practices in Professional Development. Yager, R. E. (ed.). NSTA Press, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1964. Cognitive development in children: development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2:176–186.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 2007. The Child's Conception of the World. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., and Gertzog, W. 1982. Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66:211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothero, D. R. 2003. Bringing Fossils to Life: An Introduction to Paleobiology. McGraw Hill Higher Education, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Saigo, B. W. 1999. A study to compare traditional and constructivism-based instruction of a high school biology unit on biosystematics. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa, 164 p.Google Scholar
Savarese, M. 2009. Taxonomy and phylogeny: building and comparing a taxonomy and phylogeny of bivalve mollusks. Teaching activity archived at the Science Education Resource Center. [http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/paleo/activities/34324.html].Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. L., and Henry, D. P. 2006. Project LAUNCH II mathematics and science partnership (MSP) program. Report to the Florida Department of Education and U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. L., Saigo, B. W., and Stepans, J. I. 2006. Conceptual Change Model: The CCM Handbook. Saiwood Publications, St. Cloud, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Stepans, J. I. 2006. Targeting Students' Science Misconceptions: Physical Science Concepts Using the Conceptual Change Model (third edition). Showboard, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
Stepans, J. I., and Schmidt, D. L. 2009. From Wyoming to Florida, they ask, “Why wasn't I taught this way?”, p. 57–70. In Yaeger, R. (ed.), Inquiry: The Key to Exemplary Science. National Science Teachers Association Press, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar