Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:26:19.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Balancing Resources and Collections Needs: I. Acquisition and Accession of Invertebrate Fossils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Elizabeth Merritt  and
Scott Lidgard
Elizabeth Merritt
Affiliation:
American Association of Museums, 1575 Eye Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20005
Scott Lidgard
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lakeshore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605
Get access

Extract

ALL MUSEUMS have limited resources, and all acquisitions use some of these resources, whether they be space, money, staff time or materials. When museums purchase collections objects, some “costs” are evident up front, and there are frequently mechanisms in place at a high level to monitor that use of museum resources. For example, in art museums this is often a committee of the board of directors empowered to approve or deny curatorial proposals for major (i.e., expensive) acquisitions. However when the object is “free,” as in most invertebrate paleontology collections where material is either donated or collected in the field by museum staff, the cost of acquiring the object is essentially hidden. Some acquisition costs may be fixed regardless of the size or nature of the acquisition, and some vary depending the amount of space the material will require, or the amount of cleaning or conservation needed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 10: Guidelines for the Management and Curation of Invertebrate Fossil Collections including a Data Model and Standards for Computerization , 2000 , pp. 73 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsle, P. 1997. The Deaccessioning Strategy at Glenbow: 1992 - 1997.” Pp. 125–142 in Weil, Stephen E., (ed.) A Deaccessioning Reader. The American Association of Museums, Washington, D.C., 257pp. Google Scholar
andErson, S. 1973. It Costs More to Store a Whale than a Mouse: Libraries, Collections and the Costs of Knowledge. Curator 16(1) pp 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, T. 1996. Over-collecting: when is enough too much? A report of a talk by Janet Shadel Spillman at the 1995 AAM Annual meeting. RC-AAM Newsletter, Spring 1996.Google Scholar
Lord, B., Lord, G. D. and Nicks, J. 1989. The Cost of Collecting: Collections Management in UK Museums - Report Commissioned by the Office of Arts & Libraries. Museum Enterprises Ltd. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
Malaro, M. C. 1979. Collection Management Policies. Museum News, November/December.Google Scholar
Price, J. C. and Fitzgerald, G. R. 1996. Categories of Specimens: a collections management tool. Collection Forum 12(1) pp 8–13.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, L. 1997. The Not-So-Fine Art of Deacquisition. The Wall Street Journal, Thursday February 13, 1997.Google Scholar
Waller, R. 1994. Conservation Risk Assessment: A strategy for managing resources for preventative conservation. Preprints of the Contributions to the Ottawa Congress, September 1994, Preventative Conservation: Practice, Theory, Research, Roy, A. and Smith, P. (eds.), IIC, London, pp 12–16.Google Scholar
Waller, R. 1995. Risk Management Applied to Preventative Conservation. Pp 21–28 In: Rose, C. L., Hawks, C. A. and Genoways, H. H. (eds.). Storage of Natural History Collections: a Preventative Conservation Approach. Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections, Iowa City, x+448 pp.Google Scholar
Waller, R. 1996. Preventative Conservation Planning for Large and Diverse Collections. Preservation of Collections Assessment, Evaluation, and Mitigation Strategies. Preprints of the June 10-11, 1996 workshop, American Institute for Conservation, Washington, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Young, J. C. 1992. Technology and Conservation.Google Scholar