Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:29:19.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stratigraphic biases in the analysis of taxonomic survivorship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

J. John Sepkoski Jr.
J. John Sepkoski Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, N. Y. 14627
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taxonomic survivorship curves may reflect stratigraphic as well as biologic factors. The approximately lognormal distribution of lengths of Phanerozoic time intervals produces an error in the estimation of taxonomic durations that is also lognormally distributed. As demonstrated by several simulated examples, this error may cause concave taxonomic survivorship curves to appear linear, especially if the maximum durations involved are relatively short. The error of estimation also makes highly concave taxonomic survivorship curves virtually unrecognizable. Incomplete sampling of the fossil record, on the other hand, may not be a serious problem in survivorship analysis. Simulated paleontological sampling employing a simple model suggests that survivorship curves tend to retain their original shapes even when as few as 20% of the taxa have been discovered. However, concave taxonomic survivorship curves tend to lose their concavity as efficiency of sampling declines.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Fall 1975 , pp. 343 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Berggren, W. A. 1972. A Cenzoic time-scale—Some implications for regional geology and paleobiogeography. Lethaia. 5:195–215.Google Scholar
Blatt, H. and Jones, R. L. 1975. Proportions of exposed igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86:1085–1088.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1975. Evolution and Extinction Rate Controls. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. 1973. Evolutionary patterns in the Paleozoic Bivalvia: Documentation and some theoretical considerations. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 84:2079–2096.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 490 pp. John Murray; London.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S. 1947. Life tables for natural populations of animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 22:283–314.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1967. The incompleteness of our knowledge of the fossil record. J. Paleontol. 41:559–565.Google Scholar
Garrels, R. M. and MacKenzie, F. T. 1971. Evolution of Sedimentary Rocks. 397 pp. W. W. Norton & Co., Inc.; New York.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Smith, A. G., and Wilcock, B., eds. 1964. The Phanerozoic Time-scale: A Symposium. 458 pp. Geological Society; London.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. et al., eds. 1967. The Fossil Record. 828 pp. Geol. Soc.; London.Google Scholar
Henbest, L. G. 1952. Significance of evolutionary explosions for diastrophic division of earth history. J. Paleontol. 26:299–318.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1954. Population dynamics—A new method in paleontology. J. Paleontol. 28:286–292.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1964. Population structure in paleoecology. pp. 91–106. In: Imbrie, J. and Newell, N., eds. Approaches to Paleoecology. 432 pp. John Wiley & Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., ed. 1953–. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kans. Press; Lawrence, Kans.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1959. Adequacy of the fossil record. J. Paleontol. 33:488–499.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science. 177:1065–1071.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1975. Taxonomic survivorship curves and Van Valen's Law. Paleobiology. 1:82–96.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Stanley, S. M. 1971. Principles of Paleontology. 388 pp. W. H. Freeman and Co.; San Francisco.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. 3rd ed.468 pp. Univ. of Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. 434 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1960. The history of life. pp. 117–180. In: Tax, S., ed. Evolution after Darwin. Vol. I. The Evolution of Life. 629 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Teichert, C. 1956. How many fossil species? J. Paleontol. 30:967–969.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1974. Environmental and evolutionary stability in bivalve mollusks. Science. 186:828–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentine, J. W. 1970. How many marine invertebrate fossil species? A new approximation. J. Paleontol. 44:410–415.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory. 1:1–30.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1974. Molecular evolution as predicted by natural selection. J. Mol. Evol. 3:89–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed