Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:34:31.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The potentials and limitations of dicotyledonous wood anatomy for climatic reconstructions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Elisabeth A. Wheeler  and
Pieter Baas
Elisabeth A. Wheeler
Affiliation:
Department of Wood and Paper Science, Box 8005, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8005
Pieter Baas
Affiliation:
Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, Post Office Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The incidences of selected features of dicotyledonous wood that are believed to be of ecologic and/or phylogenetic significance (distinct growth rings, narrow and wide vessel diameter, high and low vessel frequencies, scalariform perforations, tangential vessel arrangement, ring porosity, and helical wall thickenings) were plotted through time (Cretaceous–Recent). There are marked differences between the Cretaceous and Tertiary in the frequency of all wood anatomical features. Incidences of features that are associated with markedly seasonal climates in extant floras do not approach modern levels until the Neogene. Correlations of wood anatomical features with ecology do not appear to have been constant through time, because in the Cretaceous different features provide conflicting information about the climate. Throughout the Tertiary the southern hemisphere/tropical and the northern hemisphere/temperate regions differed in the incidences of ecologically significant features and these differences are similar to those in the Recent flora. Possibilities for reliably using dicotyledonous wood for climatic reconstructions appear restricted to the Tertiary and Quaternary. However, at present the fossil wood record for most epochs and regions is too limited to permit detailed reconstructions of their past climate.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 487 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baas, P. 1973. The wood anatomical range in Ilex (Aquifoliaceae) and its ecological and phylogenetic significance. Blumea 21:193–258.Google Scholar
Baas, P. 1976. Some functional and adaptive aspects of vessel member morphology. Pp. 157–181In Baas, P., Bolton, A. J. and Catling, D. M., eds. Wood structure in biological and technological research. Leiden Botanical Series. No. 3. Leiden University Press, The Hague, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baas, P. 1986. Ecological patterns of xylem anatomy. Pp. 327–352In Givnish, J., ed. On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.Google Scholar
Baas, P., and Schweingruber, F. H. 1987. Ecological trends in the wood anatomy of trees, shrubs and climbers from Europe. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin new series 8:245–274.Google Scholar
Baas, P., Werker, E., and Fahn, A. 1983. Some ecological trends in vessel characters. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin new series 4:141–159.Google Scholar
Bailey, I. W., and Sinnott, E. W. 1915. A botanical index of Cretaceous and Tertiary climates. Science 41:832–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, I. W., and Tupper, W. W. 1918. Size variation in tracheary cells. I. A comparison between the secondary xylems of vascular cryptogams, gymnosperms and angiosperms. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 54:149–204.Google Scholar
Carlquist, S. 1975. Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlquist, S. 1977. Ecological factors in wood evolution: a floristic approach. American Journal of Botany 64:887–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlquist, S. 1984. Vessel grouping in dicotyledon wood: significance and relationship to imperforate tracheary elements. Aliso 10:505–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlquist, S. 1988. Comparative wood anatomy. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlquist, S., and Hoekman, D. S. 1985. Ecological wood anatomy of the woody southern California flora. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin new series 6:319–347.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, K. A. 1964. Growth rings in tropical trees and taxonomy. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 43:334–342.Google Scholar
Collinson, M. E. 1990. Plant evolution and ecology during the early Cainozoic diversification. Advances in Botanical Research 17:1–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creber, G. T., and Chaloner, W. G. 1985. Tree growth in Mesozoic and early Tertiary and the reconstruction of paleoclimates. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 52:35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickison, W. C. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative anatomy. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 62:590–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickison, W. C. 1989. Steps toward the natural system of the dicotyledons: vegetative anatomy. Aliso 12:555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, J. E. 1986. Growth rings in Cretaceous and Tertiary wood from Antarctica and their palaeoclimatic implications. Palaeontology 29:665–684.Google Scholar
Frost, F. H. 1930a. Specialization in secondary xylem in dicotyledons. I. Origin of vessel. Botanical Gazette 89:67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, F. H. 1930b. Specialization in secondary xylem in dicotyledons. II. Evolution of end wall of vessel segment. Botanical Gazette 89:198–212.Google Scholar
Frost, F. H. 1931. Specialization in secondary xylem in dicotyledons. III. Specialization of lateral wall of vessel segment. Botanical Gazette 89:88–96.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. G. 1940. Evolutionary significance of ring porosity in woody angiosperms. Botanical Gazette 102:105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, B. 1935. Die physiologische Bedeutung der Ring- und Zerstreutporigkeit. Berichte Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft 53:711–719.Google Scholar
IAWA Committee. 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin new series 10:219–332.Google Scholar
LaPasha, C. A., and Wheeler, E. A. 1987. A microcomputer based system for computer-aided wood identification. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin n.s. 8:347–354.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, C. R., and Chalk, L. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 2 vols. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1991. The future of analytical paleobiology. Pp. 207–216In Gilinsky, N. L. and Signor, R. W., eds. Analytical paleobiology. Short course in paleontology, No. 4. Paleontological Society. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Spicer, R., and Parrish, J. T. 1990. Latest Cretaceous woods of the Central North Slope, Alaska. Palaeontology 33:225–242.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach, 2d ed.McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stern, W. L. 1978. A retrospective view of comparative anatomy, phylogeny, and plant taxonomy. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin 1978/2–3:33–39.Google Scholar
Tippo, O. 1938. Comparative anatomy of the Moraceae and their presumed allies. Botanical Gazette 100:1–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upchurch, G. R. Jr., and Wolfe, J. A. 1987. Mid-Cretaceous to early Tertiary vegetation and climate: evidence from fossil leaves and woods. Pp. 75–105In Friis, E. M., Chaloner, W. G., and Crane, P. R., eds. The origins of angiosperms and their biological consequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van der Graaff, N. A., and Baas, P. 1974. Wood anatomical variation in relation to latitude and altitude. Blumea 22:101–121.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E. A. 1991. Paleocene dicotyledonous trees from Big Bend National Park, Texas: variability in wood types common in the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, and ecological inferences. American Journal of Botany 78:658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, E. A., and Baas, P. 1991. A survey of the fossil record for dicotyledonous wood and its significance for evolutionary and ecological wood anatomy. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin n.s. 12:271–332.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E. A., Pearson, R. G., LaPasha, C. A., Zack, T., and Hatley, W. 1986. Computer-aided wood identification. Reference manual. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Bulletin 474:1–160.Google Scholar
Wing, S. L., and Tiffney, B. H. 1987. The reciprocal interaction of angiosperm evolution and tetrapod herbivory. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 50:179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1971. Tertiary climatic fluctuations and methods of analysis of Tertiary floras. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 9:27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1978. A paleobotanical interpretation of Tertiary climates in the northern hemisphere. American Scientist 66:694–703.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1985. Distribution of major vegetational types during the Tertiary. Pp. 357–375In Sundquist, E. T. and Broecker, W. S., eds. The carbon cycle and atmospheric CO2: natural variation Archean to present. Geophysical Monograph 32. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A., and Upchurch, G. R. Jr. 1987. North American nonmarine climates and vegetation during the Late Cretaceous. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 61:33–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, M. H. 1983. Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar