Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:56:11.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phyletic gradualism vs. punctuated equilibrium: applicability of neontological data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Robert E. Ricklefs*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Abstract

An equation for the distribution of divergence times between closest relatives is derived to explore the possibility that contemporary data might shed some light on the controversy between supporters of gradual versus punctuated phyletic change. The principal assumptions of the model are uniform rates of speciation and extinction, bifurcating speciation, and uniform patterns of divergence, by whatever measure, among species in a taxon. The structure of the model indicates clear differences between patterns generated by extremes of gradualism and punctuation. But inability to verify critical assumptions considerably weakens the applicability of the model to the gradualism-punctuation problem.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology. 3:115151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley; New York.Google Scholar