Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T19:06:48.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling growth rates for sauropod dinosaurs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Thomas M. Lehman  and
Holly N. Woodward
Thomas M. Lehman
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409–1053. E-mail: [email protected]
Holly N. Woodward
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409–1053. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sauropod dinosaurs were the largest terrestrial animals and their growth rates remain a subject of debate. By counting growth lines in histologic sections and relating bone length to body mass, it has been estimated that Apatosaurus attained its adult body mass of about 25,000 kg in as little as 15 years, with a maximum growth rate over 5000 kg/yr. This rate exceeds that projected for a precocial bird or eutherian mammal of comparable estimated body mass. An alternative method of estimating limb length and body mass for each growth line, and fitting the resulting age/mass data to the von Bertalanffy growth equation, yields a revised growth curve suggesting that Apatosaurus adult mass was reached by 70 years with a maximum growth rate of 520 kg/yr. This alternative method for growth rate determination can also be applied to histological studies of other sauropods. At only about half the mass of Apatosaurus, Janenschia took between 20 and 30 years to attain its adult size (over 14,000 kg). This result is supported by independent evidence of estimated bone apposition rates. Despite having an adult body mass greater than Apatosaurus, the titanosaurid Alamosaurus attained a mass over 32,000 kg within 45 years and a maximum growth rate of 1000 kg/yr. Titanosaurids may have been the fastest growing of all sauropods. Even so, sauropod growth rate estimates produced using the von Bertalanffy equation fall between those projected for reptiles and those for precocial birds of equivalent projected body mass. These results are comparable to those found for smaller dinosaurs, and suggest that sauropods grew at rates similar to other dinosaurs in spite of their great size.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Spring 2008 , pp. 264 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alexander, R. M. 1989. Dynamics of dinosaurs and other extinct giants. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. F., Hall-Martin, A., and Russell, D. A. 1985. Longbone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and dinosaurs. Journal of Zoology A 207:53–61.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. 1999. Eggs, nests, and baby dinosaurs. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K., and McIntosh, J. 1994. Upper Jurassic sauropod babies from the Morrison Formation. Pp. 265–278 in Carpenter, K., Hirsch, K., and Horner, J., eds. Dinosaur eggs and babies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Case, T. J. 1978a. On the evolution and adaptive significance of postnatal growth rates in the terrestrial vertebrates. Quarterly Review of Biology 53:243–282.Google Scholar
Case, T. J. 1978b. Speculations on the growth rate and reproduction of some dinosaurs. Paleobiology 4:320–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castanet, J., Francillon-Vieillot, H., Meunier, F. J., and de Ricqlès, A. 1993. Bone and individual aging. Pp. 245–283 in Hall, B. K., ed. Bone, Vol. 7. Bone growth. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. Google Scholar
Curry, K. A. 1999. Ontogenetic histology of Apatosaurus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda): new insights on growth rates and longevity. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19:654–665.Google Scholar
Dunham, A. E., Overall, K. L., Porter, W. P., and Forster, C. A. 1989. Implications of ecological energetics and biophysical and developmental constraints for life-history variation in dinosaurs. Pp. 1–19 in Farlow, J. O., ed. Paleobiology of the dinosaurs. Geological Society of America Special Paper 238.Google Scholar
Erickson, G. M. 2005. Assessing dinosaur growth patterns: a microscopic revolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:677–684.Google Scholar
Erickson, G. M., Rogers, K. C., and Yerby, S. A. 2001. Dinosaurian growth patterns and rapid avian growth rates. Nature 412:429–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, J. R., de Ricqlès, A., and Padian, K. 1999. Variation in dinosaur skeletochronology indicators: implications for age assessment and physiology. Paleobiology 25:295–304.Google Scholar
Horner, J. R., de Ricqlès, A., and Padian, K. 2000. Long bone histology of the hadrosaurid dinosaur Maiasaura pebblesorum: growth dynamics and physiology based on an ontogenetic series of skeletal elements. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20:115–129.Google Scholar
Ikejiri, T. 2004. Relative growth and timing of ontogenetic changes in Camarasaurus (Dinosauria, Sauropoda). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 42:74A.Google Scholar
Laws, R. M., Parker, I. S., and Johnstone, R. C. 1975. Elephants and their habitats: the ecology of elephants in North Bunyoro, Uganda. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lehman, T. M. 2007. Growth and population age structure in the horned dinosaur Chasmosaurus. Pp. 259–317 in Carpenter, K., ed. Horns and beaks: ceratopsian and ornithopod dinosaurs. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Lehman, T. M., and Coulson, A. B. 2002. A juvenile specimen of the sauropod dinosaur Alamosaurus sanjuanensis from the Upper Cretaceous of Big Bend National Park, Texas. Journal of Paleontology 76:156–172.Google Scholar
Padian, K., de Ricqlès, A. J., and Horner, J. R. 2001. Dinosaurian growth rates and bird origins. Nature 412:405–408.Google Scholar
Paladino, F. V., Spotila, J. R., and Dodson, P. 1997. A blueprint for giants: modeling the physiology of large dinosaurs. Pp. 491–504 in Farlow, J. O. and Brett-Surman, M., eds. The complete dinosaur. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Paul, G. S. 1994. Dinosaur reproduction in the fast lane: implications for size, success, and extinction. Pp. 244–255 in Carpenter, K., Hirsch, K., and Horner, J., eds. Dinosaur eggs and babies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paul, G. S. 1997. Dinosaur models: the good, the bad, and using them to estimate the mass of dinosaurs. Pp. 129–154 in Wolberg, D. L., Stump, E., and Rosenberg, G. D., eds. DinoFest international. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1981. Lamellar-zonal bone with zones and annuli in the pelvis of a sauropod dinosaur. Nature 292:49–51.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1987. Bone and dinosaurian “endothermy.” Modern Geology 11:133–154.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1990. Zonal “growth rings” in dinosaurs. Modern Geology 15:19–48.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1997. Dinosaurian physiology: the case for “intermediate” dinosaurs. Pp. 449–473 in Farlow, J. O. and Brett-Surman, M., eds. The complete dinosaur. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. 1968. Patterns of growth in birds. Ibis 110:419–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. 1973. Patterns of growth in birds. II. Growth rate and mode of development. Ibis 115:177–201.Google Scholar
Ricqlès, A. de 1983. Cyclical growth in the long limb bones of a sauropod dinosaur. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 28:225–232.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1989. An odyssey in time: the dinosaurs of North America. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Sander, P. M. 2000. Long bone histology of the Tendaguru sauropods: implications for growth and biology. Paleobiology 26:466–488.Google Scholar
Sander, P. M., and Klein, N. 2005. Developmental plasticity in the life history of a prosauropod dinosaur. Science 310:1800–1802.Google Scholar
Sander, P. M., and Tuckmantel, C. 2003. Bone lamina thickness, bone apposition rates, and age estimates in sauropod humeri and femora. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 77:161–172.Google Scholar
Sander, P. M., Klein, N., Buffetaut, E., Cuny, G., Suteethorn, V., and Le Loeuff, J. 2004. Adaptive radiation in sauropod dinosaurs: bone histology indicates rapid evolution of giant body size through acceleration. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 4:165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebacher, F. 2001. A new method to calculate allometric length-mass relationships of dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21:51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotila, J. R., Dodson, P., and Paladino, F. V. 1991. Hot and cold running dinosaurs: body size, metabolism and migration. Modern Geology 16:203–227.Google Scholar
Tidwell, V., and Wilhite, D. R. 2005. Ontogenetic variation and isometric growth in the forelimb of the Early Cretaceous sauropod Venenosaurus. Pp. 187–196 in Tidwell, V. and Carpenter, K., eds. Thunder lizards. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. C. 1983. The improbable endotherm: the energetics of the sauropod dinosaur Brachiosaurus . Paleobiology 9:173–182.Google Scholar
Wedel, M. J. 2003. Vertebral pneumaticity, air sacs, and the physiology of sauropod dinosaurs. Paleobiology 29:243–255.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. A., and Sereno, P. C. 1998. Early evolution and higher-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 5.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. N. 2005. Bone histology of the sauropod dinosaur Alamosaurus sanjuanensis from the Javelina Formation, Big Bend National Park, Texas. . Texas Tech University, Lubbock.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. N., and Lehman, T. M. 2006. Using limb circumference and body mass to estimate sauropod dinosaur growth rates. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26:141A.Google Scholar