Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:57:40.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mode of life of planktonic graptolites: flotation structure in Ordovician Dicellograptus sp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Stanley C. Finney*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois 60605

Abstract

An unusual isolated specimen representing an immature rhabdosome of Dicellograptus sp. from the Middle Ordovician Athens Shale of Alabama has a flattened sphere attached to the distal end of the nema. The flattened sphere can be interpreted as a float that probably conferred buoyancy on the rhabdosome. Such floats, which became detached in mature rhabdosomes, may be common in the fossil record. The presence of nematophorous siculae in all planktonic graptolites suggests that for immature rhabdosomes a passive, buoyant mode of life, attained by means of a float, might have been widespread taxonomically. This mode of life is compatible with the theory of passive response for the mode of life of mature rhabdosomes, but it is difficult to reconcile with the theory of automobility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Archer, J. B. and Fortey, R. A. 1974. Ordovician graptolites from the Valhallfonna Formation, northern Spitsbergen. Pp. 8798. In: Richards, R. B., Jackson, D. E. and Hughes, C. P., eds. Graptolite Studies in Honour of O. M. B. Bulman. Spec. Pap. Paleontol. 13.Google Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1964. Lower Palaeozoic plankton. Q. J. Geol. Soc. London. 120:455476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1970. Graptolithina. Pp. V1V163. In: Teichert, C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, 2nd ed., Pt. V. 163 pp.Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kans. Press; Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1940. Regeneration in Beriech der Graptolithen Prosicula. Paläontol. Z. 22:100104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdtmann, B.-D. 1973. Life Forms and Feeding Habits of Graptolites. In: Braodman, , Cheetham, , and Oliver, , eds. Animal Colonies. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc.; Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Finney, S. C. 1977. Graptolites of the Middle Ordovician Athens Shale, Alabama. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Ohio, 2 vols., 585 pp.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1865. Graptolites of the Quebec Group. Geol. Surv. Canada, Canad. Organic Remains, dec. 2:1151.Google Scholar
Hutt, J. 1974. The development of Clonograptus tenellus and Adelograptus hunnebergensis. Lethaia. 7:7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, N. H. 1969. Some thoughts on the ecology, mode of life, and evolution of the Graptolithina. Proc. Geol. Soc. London. 1659:273292.Google Scholar
Kirk, N. H. 1972. More thoughts on the automobility of graptolites. J. Geol. Soc. 128:127133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, P. 1926. Ontogenetische Entwicklung und Biologie von Diplograptus und Monograptus. Paläontol. Z. 7:207249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozłowski, R. 1971. Early development stage and mode of life of graptolites. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 16:313343.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C. 1897. Die Lebenweise der Graptolithen. Pp. 238258. In: Walther, J., ed. Lebenweise fossiler Meeresthiere. Deutsch. Geol. Ges., Z. 49.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1975. Palaeoecology of the Graptolithina, an extinct class of the Phylum Hemichordata. Biol. Rev. 50:397436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1897. Development and mode of growth of Diplograptus McCoy. New York State Geol. Surv. Annu. Rept. for 1894:219249.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1904. Graptolites of New York, Pt. I. New York State Mu. Mem. 7:457803.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1958. Monograptidae from erratic boulders of Poland. Palaeontol. Pol. 9:1105.Google Scholar