Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:21:05.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass extinction patterns of marine invertebrate groups and some implications for a causal phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Michael L. McKinney
Michael L. McKinney*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A nonparametric analysis of the extinction patterns of 10 major marine invertebrate groups at the five most profound mass extinction events leads to five observations: (1) At each event some taxonomic groups were affected much more than others. (2) There is little consistency among events in terms of which taxonomic groups were most or least affected; however, adaptive groupings do exhibit consistency: benthic, mobile organisms suffered significantly fewer extinctions than sessile suspension feeders, while the pelagic organisms apparently suffered the most. (3) There are no convincing patterns of interrelated extinctions among taxonomic groups. (4) No group exhibits a persistent tendency through time for a relative increase or decrease in their extinction rate at the events. (5) Some relationships are seen between the extinction patterns of three pairs of events; the Late Ordovician and Late Devonian events exhibit a significantly similar pattern (the same taxonomic groups suffered the most extinction in both cases) as do the Late Triassic and Late Cretaceous events. The Late Permian and Late Cretaceous events show a significantly inverse pattern (the most affected groups in the former were among the least affected in the latter). Upon examination, these observations, notably 1, 2, and 5, are consonant with current scenarios of the effects of catastrophic bolide impacts on marine fauna.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1985 , pp. 227 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Fischer, A. G. and Arthur, M. A. 1977. Secular variations in the pelagic. Pp. 19–50. In: Cook, H. E. and Enos, P., eds. Deep-Water Carbonate Environments. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 25.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., Raup, D. M., Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Schopf, T. J. M., and Simberloff, D. S. 1977. The shape of evolution: a comparison of real versus random clades. Paleobiology. 3:23–40.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1984. The causes of mass extinctions. Nature. 308:686–687.Google Scholar
Haynes, J. R. 1981. Foraminifera. Wiley; New York. 433 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, K. J., He, Q., McKenzie, J. A., Weissert, H., Perch-Nielsen, K., Oberhansli, H., Kelts, K., LaBrecque, J., Tauxe, L., Krahenbuhl, U., Percival, S. F., Wright, R., Karpoff, A. M., Petersen, N., Tucker, P., Poore, R. Z., Gombos, A. M., Pisciotto, K., Carman, M. F. Jr., and Schreiber, E. 1982. Mass mortality and its environmental and evolutionary consequences. Science. 216:249–256.Google Scholar
Kastner, M., Asaro, F., Michel, J. V., Alvarez, W., and Alvarez, L. W. 1984. The precursor of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary clays at Stevns Klint, Denmark, and DSDP Hole 465A. Science. 226:137–143.Google Scholar
Pollack, J. B., Toon, O. B., Ackerman, T. P., and McKay, C. P. 1983. Environmental effects of an impact-generated dust cloud: implications for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinctions. Science. 219:287–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science. 215:1501–1503.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81:801–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schopf, T. J. M. 1974. Permo-Triassic extinctions: relation to sea-floor spreading. J. Geol. 82:129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. A Compendium of Fossil Marine Families. Milwaukee Public Museum Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 125 pp.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology. 10:246–267.Google Scholar
Smith, J. M. 1984. Palaeontology at the high table. Nature. 309:401–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1984a. Marine mass extinctions: a dominant role for temperature. Pp. 69–118. In: Nitecki, M. H., ed. Extinctions. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1984b. Temperature and biotic crises in the marine realm. Geology. 12:205–208.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1979. Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities. Science. 203:458–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, N. R. 1972. Statistics: An Applied Approach. Xerox College Publ.; Lexington, Mass. 608 pp.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators, and grazers. Paleobiology. 3:245–258.Google Scholar