Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T00:46:49.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incumbency, diversity, and latitudinal gradients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

James W. Valentine ,
David Jablonski ,
Andrew Z. Krug  and
Kaustuv Roy
James W. Valentine
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California 95720. E-mail: [email protected]
David Jablonski
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637. E-mail: [email protected]
Andrew Z. Krug
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637. E-mail: [email protected]
Kaustuv Roy
Affiliation:
Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gillman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Physical environmental factors have been seen as paramount in determining many large-scale biodistributional patterns in time and space. Although this is probably correct for many situations, this view has become so pervasive that it has led to the neglect of the role of biotic interactions in setting large-scale diversity patterns. (In this paper diversity denotes taxonomic richness.) New approaches to this perennial debate on the roles of physical and biotic forces in paleoecology and macroevolution are needed, and here we explore an argument for the role of incumbency or priority effects in the dynamics behind the most dramatic spatial pattern in biodiversity, the latitudinal diversity gradient.

Type
Matters of the Record
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Spring 2008 , pp. 169 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allison, P. A., and Briggs, D. E. G. 1993. Paleolatitudinal sampling bias, Phanerozoic species diversity, and the end-Permian extinction. Geology 21:65–68.Google Scholar
Arim, M., Abades, S. R., Neill, P. E., Lima, M., and Marquet, P. A. 2006. Spread dynamics of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:374–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armbrecht, I., Pefecto, I., and Vandermeer, J. 2004. Enigmatic biodiversity correlations: ant diversity responds to diverse resources. Science 304:284–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beard, K. C. 1998. East of Eden: Asia as an important center of taxonomic origination in mammalian evolution. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 34:5–39.Google Scholar
Clark, A., and Crame, J. A. 2003. The importance of historical processes in global patterns of diversity. Pp. 130–151 in Blackburn, T. M. and Gaston, K. J., eds. Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
Connolly, S. R., Bellwood, D. R., and Hughes, T. P. 2003. Indo-Pacific biodiversity of coral reefs: deviations from a mid-domain model. Ecology 84:2178–2190.Google Scholar
Crame, J. A. 2000. Evolution of taxonomic diversity gradients in the marine realm: evidence from the composition of Recent bivalve faunas. Paleobiology 26:188–214.Google Scholar
Crame, J. A. 2001. Taxonomic diversity gradients through geological time. Diversity and Distributions 7:175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crame, J. A. 2002. Evolution of taxonomic diversity gradients in the marine realm: a comparison of Late Jurassic and Recent bivalve faunas. Paleobiology 28:184–207.Google Scholar
Crame, J. A., and Rosen, B. R. 2002. Cenozoic palaeogeography and the rise of modern biodiversity patterns. Geological Society of London Special Publication 177:227–246.Google Scholar
Crombie, A. D. 1945. On competition between different species of gramnivorous insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 132:362–395.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. 1950. Evolution in the tropics. American Scientist 38:209–221.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 2007. Disparity: morphologic pattern and developmental context. Palaeontology 50:57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etter, R. J., and Grassle, J. F. 1992. Patterns of species diversity in the deep sea as a function of sediment particle size diversity. Nature 360:576–578.Google Scholar
Fine, P. V. A. 2002. The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18:687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, M. 2001. Evolutionary rates and the age distributions of living and extinct taxa. Pp. 245–194 in Jackson, J. B. C., Lidgard, S., and McKinney, F. K., eds. Evolutionary patterns. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Fridley, J. D., Stachowicz, J. J., Naeem, S., Sax, D. F., Seabloom, E. W., Smith, M. D., Stohlgren, T. J., Tilman, D., and Von Holle, B. 2007. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88:3–17.Google Scholar
Gage, J. D., and Tyler, J. A. 1991. Deep-sea biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., and Spicer, J. L. 1998. Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:70–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gladenkov, Y. B., and Sinelnikova, V. N. 1990. Miocene mollusks and climate in Kamchatka. Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta Akademiya Nauk SSSR 453:1–173. [In Russian.] Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. E., Roy, K., Lande, R., and Jablonski, D. 2005. Diversity, endemism and age distribution in macroevolutionary sources and sinks. American Naturalist 165:623–633.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. L. 2002. Distribution and biodiversity of Australian tropical marine bioinvasions. Pacific Science 56:213–222.Google Scholar
Hickerson, M. J., and Cunningham, C. W. 2006. Nearshore fish (Pholis gunnellus) persists across the North Atlantic through multiple glacial episodes. Molecular Ecology 15:4095–4107.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1993. The tropics as a source of evolutionary novelty: the post-Palaeozoic fossil record of marine invertebrates. Nature 364:142–144.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2005. Evolutionary innovations in the fossil record: the intersection of ecology, development and macroevolution. Journal of Experimental Zoology B 304:504–519.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Lutz, R. A. 1983. Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: paleobiological implications. Biological Reviews 58:21–89.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1996. Paleobiology, community ecology, and scales of ecological pattern. Ecology 77:1367–1378.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., Roy, K., and Valentine, J. W. 2006. Out of the tropics: evolutionary dynamics of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Science 314:102–106.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., and Johnson, K. G. 2001. Measuring past biodiversity. Science 293:2401–2404.Google Scholar
Jakobsson, M., Backman, J., Rudels, B., Mycander, J., Frank, M., Mayer, L., Jokat, W., Sangiorgi, F., O'Regan, M., Brinkhuis, H., King, J., and Moran, K. 2007. The early Miocene onset of a ventilated circulation regime in the Arctic Ocean. Nature 447:986–990.Google Scholar
Jansson, R. W. 2003. Global patterns in endemism explained by past climatic change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:583–590.Google Scholar
Jones, K. E., Sechrest, W., and Gittleman, J. L. 2005. Age and area revisited: identifying global patterns and implications for conservation. Pp. 141–165 in Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., and Brooks, T., eds. Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kendrick, G. W., Wyrwoll, K. H., and Szabo, B. J. 1991. Pliocene-Pleistocene events and history along the western margin of Australia. Quaternary Science Reviews 10:419–439.Google Scholar
Kitamura, A., Omote, H., and Oda, M. 2000. Molluscan response to early Pleistocene rapid warming in the Sea of Japan. Geology 28:723–726.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, J. 1979. Deep-sea bivalves. Pp. 195–224 in van der Spoel, S., van Bruggen, A. C., and Lever, J., eds. Pathways in malacology. Bohn, Scheltema and Holkema, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Kreft, H., and Jetz, W. 2007. Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:5925–5930.Google Scholar
Krug, A., Jablonski, D., Roy, K., and Valentine, J. W. 2006. Contrasting bivalve latitudinal diversity gradients shaped by Cenozoic origination patterns. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 38(7):169.Google Scholar
Krug, A. Z., Jablonski, D., and Valentine, J. W. 2008. Species-genus ratios reflect a global history of diversification and range expansion in marine bivalves. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (published online 13 February 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laptikhovsky, V. 2006. Latitudinal and bathymetric trends in egg size variation: a new look at Thorson's and Rass's rules. Marine Ecology 27:7–14.Google Scholar
Lomolino, M. V., Riddle, B. R., and Brown, J. H. 2006. Biogeography, 3d ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
Longhurst, A. 1998. Ecological geography of the sea. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Martin, P. R., Bonier, F., and Tewksbury, J. J. 2007. Revisiting Jablonski (1993): cladogenesis and range expansion explain latitudinal variation in taxonomic richness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:930–936.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997. A new look at age and area: the geographic and environmental expansion of genera during the Ordovician Radiation. Paleobiology 23:410–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelbach, G. G., Schemske, D. W., Cornell, H. V., Allen, A. P., Brown, J. M., Bush, M. B., Harrison, S. P., Hurlbert, A. H., Knowlton, N., Lessios, H. A., McCain, C. M., McCune, A. R., McDade, L. A., McPeek, M. A., Near, T. J., Price, T. D., Ricklefs, R. E., Roy, K., Sax, D. F., Schluter, D., Sobel, J. M., and Turelli, M. 2007. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecology Letters 10:315–331.Google Scholar
O'Dea, A., Jackson, J. B. C., Fortunato, H., Smith, J. T., D'Croz, L., Johnson, K. G., and Todd, J. A. 2007. Environmental change preceded Caribbean extinction by 2 million years. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:5501–5506.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. 2003. Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Ogasawara, K. 1994. Neogene paleogeography and marine climate of the Japanese Islands based on shallow-marine molluscs. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 108:335–351.Google Scholar
Paulay, G., Kirkendale, L., Lambert, G., and Meyer, C. 2002. Anthropogenic biotic interchange in a coral reef ecosystem: a case study from Guam. Pacific Science 56:403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffi, S., Stanley, S. M., and Marasti, R. 1985. Biogeographic patterns and Plio-Pleistocene extinction of Bivalvia in the Mediterranean and southern North Sea. Paleobiology 11:368–388.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. 1996. Species richness and resistance to invasions. Pp. 153–172 in Orians, G., Dirzo, R., and Cushman, J. H., eds. Diversity and processes in tropical forest ecosystems. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rex, M. A., Crame, J. A., Stuart, C. T., and Clarke, A. 2005. Large-scale biogeographic patterns in marine mollusks: a confluence of history and productivity? Ecology 86:2288–2297.Google Scholar
Ribas, C. R., and Schoereder, J. H. 2006. Is the Rapoport effect widespread? Null models revisited. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15:614–624.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. M., McClean, C. J., Veron, J. E. N., Hawkins, J. P., Allen, G. R., McAllister, D. E., Mittermeier, C. G., Schueler, F. W., Spalding, M., Wells, F., Vynne, C., and Werner, T. B. 2002. Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science 295:1280–1284.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in time and space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L., and McCord, R. D. 1991. Incumbent replacement: evidence for long-term evolutionary progress. Paleobiology 17:202–213.Google Scholar
Roy, K., and Goldberg, E. E. 2007. Origination, extinction and dispersal: integrative models for understanding present-day diversity gradients. American Naturalist 170(Suppl.):S71–S85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, K., Jablonski, D., and Valentine, J. W. 1994. Eastern Pacific molluscan provinces and latitudinal diversity gradient: no evidence for “Rapoport's rule.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91:8871–8874.Google Scholar
Roy, K., Jablonski, D., and Valentine, J. W. 1995. Thermally anomalous assemblages revisited: patterns in the extraprovincial latitudinal range shifts of Pleistocene marine mollusks. Geology 23:1071–1074.Google Scholar
Roy, K., Jablonski, D., and Valentine, J. W. 2000. Higher taxa in biodiversity studies: patterns from eastern Pacific marine mollusks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351:1605–1613.Google Scholar
Roy, K., Jablonski, D., Valentine, J. W., and Rosenberg, G. 1998. Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypotheses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:3699–3702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggiero, A., and Werenkraut, V. 2007. One-dimensional analyses of Rapoport's Rule reviewed through meta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sax, D. F. 2001. Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: implications for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 28:139–150.Google Scholar
Sax, D. F., and Gaines, S. D. 2006. The biogeography of naturalized species and the species-area relationship: reciprocal insights to biogeography and invasion biology. Pp. 449–480 in Cadotte, M. W., McMahon, S. M., and Fukami, T., eds. Conceptual ecology and invasions biology: reciprocal approaches to nature. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Sax, D. F., Stachowicz, J. J., Brown, J. H., Bruno, J. F., Dawson, M. N., Gaines, S. D., Grosberg, R. K., Hastings, A., Holt, R. D., Mayfield, M. M., O'Connor, M. I., and Rice, W. R. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:465–471.Google Scholar
Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. S. 1935. The role of biotic factors in the determination of population densities. Journal of Economic Entomology 28:873–898.Google Scholar
Stachowicz, J. J., and Tilman, D. 2005. Species invasions and the relationships between species diversity, community saturation, and ecosystem functioning. Pp. 41–64 in Sax, D. F., Stachowicz, J. S., and Gaines, S. D., eds. Species invasion: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. Google Scholar
Stevens, G. C. 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographic range: how so many species co-exist in the tropics. American Naturalist 133:240–256.Google Scholar
Tankard, A. J. 1975. Thermally anomalous Late Pleistocene molluscs from the south-western Cape Province, South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 69:17–45.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. D., and Taylor, C. N. 1977. Latitudinal distribution of predatory gastropods on the Eastern Atlantic shelf. Journal of Biogeography 4:73–81.Google Scholar
Thorsen, G. 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biological Reviews 25:1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, J. A., Jackson, J. B. C., Johnson, K. G., Fortunato, H. M., Heitz, A., Alvarez, F., Marcos, A., and Jung, P. 2002. The ecology of extinction: molluscan feeding and faunal turnover in the Caribbean Neogene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:571–578.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1961. Paleoecologic molluscan geography of the Californian Pleistocene. University of California Publications in Geological Science 34:309–442.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1972. Conceptual models of ecosystem evolution. Pp. 192–215 in Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1973. Evolutionary paleoecology of the marine biosphere. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1983. Seasonality: effects in marine benthic communities. Pp. 121–156 in Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L., eds. Biotic interactions in recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., and Ayala, F. J. 1978. Adaptive strategies in the sea. Pp. 323–345 in Battaglia, B. and Beardmore, J. A., eds. Marine organisms: genetics, ecology, and evolution. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., Roy, K., and Jablonski, D., 2002. Carnivore/noncarnivore ratios in northeastern Pacific marine gastropods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 228:153–163.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., Jablonski, D., Kidwell, S. M., and Roy, K. 2006. Assessing the fidelity of the fossil record by using marine bivalves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:6599–6604.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and adaptation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1991. When biotas meet: understanding biotic interchange. Science 253:1099–1104.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 2005a. From phenomenology to first principles: toward a theory of diversity. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, series 4, 56(Suppl. I, No. 2):12–23.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 2005b. Invasion as expectation: a historical fact of life. Pp. 315–339 in Sax, D. F., Stachowicz, J. S., and Gaines, S. D., eds. Species invasion: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. Google Scholar
Walker, T. D., and Valentine, J. W., 1984. Equilibrium models of evolutionary species diversity and the number of empty niches. American Naturalist 124:887–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, L. W. 1992. Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Miocene Middle Atlantic coastal plain of North America. Virginia Museum of Natural History Memoir No. 2.Google Scholar
Webb, T. J., and Gaston, K. J. 2000. Geographic range size and evolutionary age in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:1843–1850.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. J., Brandley, M. C., and Reeder, T. W. 2006. Why does a trait evolve multiple times within a clade? Repeated evolution of snakelike body form in squamate reptiles. Evolution 60:13–141.Google Scholar
Wier, J. T., and Schluter, D. 2007. The latitudinal gradient in recent speciation and extinction rates of birds and mammals. Science 315:1574–1576.Google Scholar
Willig, M. R., Kaufman, D. M., and Stevens, R. D. 2003. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:273–309.Google Scholar
Willis, J. C. 1922. Age and area: a study in geographical distribution and origin of species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar