Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:59:48.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of dental traits since latest Pleistocene in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) from Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Anthony D. Barnosky*
Affiliation:
Section of Vertebrate Fossils, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

Abstract

Digitizing the third upper molars of Microtus pennsylvanicus reveals evolutionary change in some traits but stability in others during the last 30,000 years. Fossils from Strait Canyon, Virginia (radiocarbon dated between 29,870 + 1,800/-1,400 and 17,880 ± 150 yr B.P.) were compared with modern samples from the margin of the species' conterminous geographic range: Virginia, Colorado, Alaska, and Hudson Bay. Since the late Pleistocene a modification from narrow to wide teeth took place in the eastern populations but not in the western ones, and populations in Virginia apparently evolved wider confluence between triangles 1 and 2. Traits that remained stable through time in the Virginia area, but not necessarily elsewhere, include the numerical shape factors of the occlusal surface and the posterior loop. Potentially widespread stability is evident in the perimeter of the posterior loop relative to total tooth perimeter. Tooth length forms a geographic cline, in which both the fossil and modern populations from Virginia occupy the same position. A peripheral population from southern Colorado shows the most derived dental morphology. These morphological relationships suggest that mosaic evolution operates in arvicoline lineages and provide testable paradigms for future studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, S., and Hubbard, J. P. 1971. Notes on geographic variation of Microtus pennsylvanicus (Mammalia, Rodentia) in New Mexico and Chihuahua. American Museum of Natural History Novitates 2460:18.Google Scholar
Bradley, W. G., and Cockrum, E. L. 1968. A new subspecies of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) from northwestern Chihuahua, Mexico. American Museum of Natural History Novitates 2325:17.Google Scholar
Corbet, G. B. 1975. Examples of short- and long-term changes of dental pattern in Scottish voles (Rodentia: Microtinae). Mammal Review 5:1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L. C. 1987. Late Pleistocene/Holocene environmental changes in the Central Plains of the United States: the mammalian record. Pp. 88145. In Graham, R. W., Semken, H. A. Jr., and Graham, M. A. (eds.), Late Quaternary Mammalian Biogeography and Environments of the Great Plains and Prairies. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers 22. Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Goin, O. B. 1943. A study of individual variation in Microtus pennsylvanicus pennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy 24:212223.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1988. Prolonged stability in local populations of Cerion agassizi (Pleistocene-Recent) on Great Bahama Bank. Paleobiology 14:118.Google Scholar
Graham, R. W., Semken, H. A. Jr., and Graham, M. A. (eds.). 1987. Late Quaternary Mammalian Biogeography and Environments of the Great Plains and Prairies. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers 22:1491.Google Scholar
Guilday, J. E. 1982. Dental variation in Microtus xanthognathus, M. chrotorrhinus, and M. pennsylvanicus (Rodentia: Mammalia). Annals of Carnegie Museum 51:211230.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R. D. 1965. Variability in characters undergoing rapid evolution, an analysis of Microtus molars. Evolution 19:214233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, R. D. 1971. Factors regulating the evolution of microtine tooth complexity. Zeitschrift für Saügetierkunde 36:3754.Google Scholar
Hall, E. R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. John Wiley and Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Harris, A. H. 1985. Late Pleistocene Vertebrate Paleoecology of the West. University of Texas Press; Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B., and Anderson, E. 1980. Pleistocene Mammals of North America. Columbia University Press; New York.Google Scholar
Martin, R. A. 1968. Late Pleistocene distribution of Microtus pennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy 49:265271.Google Scholar
Mickelson, D. M., Clayton, L., Fullerton, D. S., and Borns, H. W. 1983. The late Wisconsinan glacial record of the Laurentide ice sheet in the United States. Pp. 337. In Wright, H. E. Jr. (ed.), Late-Quaternary Environments of the United States, Volume 1, The Late Pleistocene, Porter, S. C. (ed.). University of Minnesota Press; Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Repenning, C. A. 1987. Biochronology of the microtine rodents of the United States. Pp. 236268. In Woodburne, M. O. (ed.), Cenozoic Mammals of North America, Geochronology and Biostratigraphy. University of California Press; Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kittler, N. 1984. Pattern and analysis of occlusal surfaces in hypsodont herbivores and its bearing on morpho-functional studies. Proceedings van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen (B) 87:453480.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kittler, N. 1986. Evolution of occlusal patterns of hypsodont rodent dentitions by shape parameters. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie unt Paläontologie Abhandlungen 173:7598.Google Scholar
Woods, C. A., Post, W., and Kilpatrick, C. W. 1982. Microtus pennsylvanicus (Rodentia: Muridae) in Florida: a Pleistocene relict in a coastal saltmarsh. Florida State Museum Biological Science Bulletin 28:2552.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1974. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar