Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:05:28.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity partitioning of a Late Ordovician marine biotic invasion: controls on diversity in regional ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Mark E. Patzkowsky  and
Steven M. Holland
Mark E. Patzkowsky
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-2714. E-mail: [email protected]
Steven M. Holland
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biotic invasions are a common feature of the fossil record, yet remarkably little is known about them, given their enormous potential to reveal the processes that regulate local and regional diversity over long time scales. We used additive diversity partitioning to examine how diversity structure changed as a result of a marine biotic invasion in tropical, shallow and deep subtidal environments spanning approximately 4 Myr in the Late Ordovician. The biotic invasion increased richness in the regional ecosystem by nearly 40%. Within-habitat turnover diversity accounts for most of the increase in richness, with between-habitat turnover diversity contributing a lesser amount. Increases in these components of diversity were accommodated by increased packing of species along a depth gradient and increased habitat heterogeneity. Diversity metrics that incorporate taxon abundance (Shannon information, Simpson's D) show similar patterns and reveal that many invading taxa were locally abundant and widespread in their occurrence. Extinction of incumbent taxa did not foster the invasion; rather the invasion appears to be linked to a regional or global warming event. Taken together, these observations indicate that these Late Ordovician marine communities were open to invasion and not saturated with species. Moreover, the increase in species diversity caused by the invasion was not ephemeral; instead it lasted for at least 1 Myr. Similar studies of other biotic invasions in the fossil record are necessary to determine (1) the factors, such as extinction of incumbents or resource limitation, that may facilitate or inhibit invasion in ancient ecosystems; (2) how local and regional ecosystems respond to invasion; and (3) the extent to which biotic invasions play a substantial role in ecosystem change through geologic time.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Spring 2007 , pp. 295 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anstey, R. L. 1986. Bryozoan provinces and patterns of generic evolution and extinction in the Late Ordovician of North America. Lethaia 19:33–51.Google Scholar
Browne, R. G. 1964. The coral horizons and stratigraphy of the Upper Richmond group in Kentucky west of the Cincinnati Arch. Journal of Paleontology 38:385–392.Google Scholar
Couteron, P., and Pélissier, R. 2004. Additive apportioning of species diversity: towards more sophisticated models and analyses. Oikos 107:215–221.Google Scholar
Crist, T. O., Veech, J. A., Gering, J. C., and Summerville, K. S. 2003. Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α, β, and γ diversity. American Naturalist 162:734–743.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1912. The Arnheim Formation within the areas traversed by the Cincinnati Geanticline. Ohio Naturalist 12:429–461.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Cocks, L. R. M. 2005. Late Ordovician global warming—the Boda event. Geology 33:405–408.Google Scholar
Fox, W. T. 1968. Quantitative paleoecologic analysis of fossil communities in the Richmond Group. Journal of Geology 76:613–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gering, J. C., and Crist, T. O. 2002. The alpha-beta-regional relationship: providing new insights into local-regional patterns of species richness and scale dependence of diversity components. Ecology Letters 5:433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gering, J. C., Crist, T. O., and Veech, J. A. 2003. Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 17:488–499.Google Scholar
Hatfield, C. B. 1968. Stratigraphy and paleoecology of the Saluda Formation (Cincinnatian) in Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky. Geological Society of America Special Paper 95:1–34.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1993. Sequence stratigraphy of a carbonate-clastic ramp: the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician) in its type area. Geological Society of America Bulletin 105:306–322.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1997. Using time/environment analysis to recognize faunal events in the Upper Ordovician of the Cincinnati Arch. Pp. 309–334 in Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C., eds. Paleontological events: stratigraphic, ecological, and evolutionary implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2000. The quality of the fossil record—a sequence stratigraphic perspective. In Erwin, D. H. and Wing, S. L., eds. Deep time: Paleobiology's perspective Paleobiology 26(Suppl. to No. 4):48–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2005. The signatures of patches and gradients in ecological ordinations. Palaios 20:573–580.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 1996. Sequence stratigraphy and long-term oceanographic change in the Middle and Upper Ordovician of the eastern United States. In Witzke, B. J., Ludvigson, G. A., and Day, J. E., eds. Paleozoic sequence stratigraphy: views from the North American Craton. Geological Society of America Special Paper 306:117–129.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 1997. Distal orogenic effects on peripheral bulge sedimentation: Middle and Upper Ordovician of the Nashville Dome. Journal of Sedimentary Research 67:250–263.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 2007. Gradient ecology of a biotic invasion: biofacies of the type Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician), Cincinnati, Ohio region, USA. Palaios (in press).Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., Miller, A. I., Meyer, D. L., and Dattilo, B. F. 2001. The detection and importance of subtle biofacies within a single lithofacies: the Upper Ordovician Kope Formation of the Cincinnati, Ohio region. Palaios 16:205–207.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1996. Paleobiology, community ecology, and scales of ecological pattern. Ecology 77:1367–1378.Google Scholar
Kolar, C. S., and Lodge, D. M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krug, A. Z., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 2004. Rapid recovery from the Late Ordovician mass extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:17605–17610.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M. 2000. Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β, and γ diversity. Ecology Letters 3:73–76.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L., Lockwood, J. L., and Frederick, D. R. 1996. Does ecosystem and evolutionary stability include rare species? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 127:191–207.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., Miller, A. I., Holland, S. M., and Dattilo, B. F. 2002. Crinoid distribution and feeding morphology through a depositional sequence: Kope and Fairview formations, Upper Ordovician, Cincinnati Arch region. Journal of Paleontology 76:725–732.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, T., Noda, T., Yamamoto, T., Ito, N., and Nakaoka, M. 2004. Latitudinal gradient of species diversity: multi-scale variability in rocky intertidal sessile assemblages along the Northwestern Pacific coast. Population Ecology 46:159–170.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 1993. Biotic response to a Middle Ordovician paleoceanographic event in eastern North America. Geology 21:619–622.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 1996. Extinction, invasion, and sequence stratigraphy: patterns of faunal change in the Middle and Upper Ordovician of the eastern United States. In Witzke, B. J., Ludvigson, G. A., and Day, J. E., eds. Paleozoic sequence stratigraphy: views from the North American Craton. Geological Society of America Special Paper 306:131–142.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 1997. Patterns of turnover in Middle and Upper Ordovician brachiopods of the eastern United States: a test of coordinated stasis. Paleobiology 23:420–443.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 1999. Biofacies replacement in a sequence stratigraphic framework: Middle and Upper Ordovician of the Nashville Dome, Tennessee, USA. Palaios 14:301–323.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 2003. Lack of community saturation at the beginning of the Paleozoic plateau: the dominance of regional over local process. Paleobiology 29:545–560.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, F. W. 1948. The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29:254–283.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. 2001. The four questions: what does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity? Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:361–367.Google Scholar
Sax, D. F., and Gaines, S. D. 2003. Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:561–566.Google Scholar
Sax, D. F., Gaines, S. D., and Brown, J. H. 2002. Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds. American Naturalist 160:766–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sax, D. F., Brown, J. H., White, E. P., and Gaines, S. D. 2005. The dynamics of species invasions: insights into the mechanisms that limit species diversity. Pp. 447–465 in Sax, D. F., Stachowicz, J. J., and Gaines, S. D., eds. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. Google Scholar
Scarponi, D., and Kowalewski, M. 2007. Sequence stratigraphic anatomy of diversity patterns: Late Quaternary benthic molluscs of Po Plain, Italy. Palaios 22:298–307.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1988. Alpha, beta, or gamma: where does all the diversity go? Paleobiology 14:221–234.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. 1962. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M. 1973. The relation of Late Ordovician glaciation to the Ordovician-Silurian changeover in North American brachiopod faunas. Lethaia 6:147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, G. C., and Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1967. Otter Creek Coral Bed and its fauna, east-central Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1244-F:1–13.Google Scholar
Stachowicz, J. J., and Tilman, D. 2005. Species invasions and the relationships between species diversity, community saturation, and ecosystem functioning. Pp. 41–64 in Sax, D. F., Stachowicz, J. J., and Gaines, S. D., eds. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 2004. A stochastic theory of resource competition, community assembly and invasions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:10854–10861.Google Scholar
Veech, J. A., Summerville, K. S., Crist, T. O., and Gering, J. C. 2002. The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99:3–9.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. 1991a. When biotas meet: understanding biotic interchange. Science 253:1099–1104.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. 1991b. Anatomy of an invasion: the trans-Arctic interchange. Paleobiology 17:281–307.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. 2005. One-way traffic in the western Atlantic: causes and consequences of Miocene to early Pleistocene molluscan invasions in Florida and the Caribbean. Paleobiology 31:624–642.Google Scholar
Wagner, H. H., Wildi, O., and Ewald, K. C. 2000. Additive diversity partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecology 15:219–227.Google Scholar
Webber, A. J. 2005. The effects of spatial patchiness on the stratigraphic signal of biotic composition (Type Cincinnatian Series, Upper Ordovician). Palaios 20:37–50.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1977. Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Pp. 1–67 in Hecht, M. K., Steere, W. C., and Wallace, B., eds. Evolutionary biology, Vol. 10. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. J., Willis, K. J., and Field, R. 2001. Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 28:453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar