Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:51:33.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brains of early carnivores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Leonard Radinsky
Leonard Radinsky*
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, University of Chicago; Chicago, Illinois 60637
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is commonly believed that the brains of the ancestors of modern carnivores (miacids) were superior to (e.g., larger than) those of other early carnivores (creodonts and mesonychids). Examination of the fossil record of brains of early carnivores reveals no evidence to support that belief. Moreover, evolutionary trends towards increasing relative brain size and an expansion of neocortex are seen in both miacids and creodonts. The neocortex expanded in a different way in miacids than in creodonts and mesonychids (evidenced by different sulcal patterns), but the biological significance of the observed differences is unknown.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , Fall 1977 , pp. 333 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Clark, W. E. Le Gros. 1947. Deformation patterns in the cerebral cortex. Pp. 1–22. In: Clark, W. E. Le Gros and Medawar, P. B., eds. Essays on Growth and Form Presented to D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Clarendon Press; Oxford.Google Scholar
Colbert, E. H. 1969. Evolution of the Vertebrates. 2nd ed.Wiley; New York.Google Scholar
Dechaseaux, C. 1969. Moulages endocraniens d'artiodactyles primitifs. Ann. Paléontol. 55:195–248.Google Scholar
Denison, R. 1938. The broad-skulled Pseudocreodi. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 37:163–256.Google Scholar
Edinger, T. 1964. Midbrain exposure and overlap in mammals. Am. Zool. 4:5–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gervais, P. 1870. Mémoire sur les formes cérébrales propres aux carnivores vivants et fossiles. Nouv. Arch. Mus. d'Hist. Nat. Paris. 6:103–162.Google Scholar
Jepsen, G. L. 1966. Early Eocene bat from Wyoming. Science. 154:1333–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerison, H. 1973. Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. 482 pp. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Klinghardt, F. 1934. Gehirnrelief und Schädelstudien über Hyaenodon und Dinictis. Z. Saügetierk. 9:76–86.Google Scholar
Marsh, O. C. 1884. Dinocerata, a monograph of an extinct order of gigantic mammals. 237 pp. U.S. Geol. Surv. Monogr. 10.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. 1909. The Carnivora and Insectivora of the Bridger Basin, Middle Eocene. Mem. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 9:289–567.Google Scholar
Oboussier, H. 1972. Evolution of the mammalian brain. Some evidence on the phylogeny of the antilope species. Acta Anat. 83:70–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Passingham, R. E. 1975. Changes in the size and organisation of the brain in man and his ancestors. Brain, Behav., Evol. 11:73–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piveteau, J. 1935. Études sur quelques créodontes des Phosphorites du Quercy. Ann. Paléontol. 24:73–95.Google Scholar
Piveteau, J. 1961. Encéphales de Carnivores fossiles. Pp. 806–820. In: Piveteau, J., ed. Traité de Paléontologie. Vol. 6. Masson; Paris.Google Scholar
Piveteau, J. 1962. L'encéphale de Viverravus angustidens, miacidé des Phosphorites du Quercy. Ann. Paléontol. 48:163–175.Google Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1968a. A new approach to mammalian cranial analysis, illustrated by examples of prosimian primates. J. Morphol. 124:167–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radinsky, L. 1968b. Evolution of somatic sensory specialization in otter brains. J. Comp. Neurol. 134:495–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radinsky, L. 1970. The fossil evidence of prosimian brain evolution. Pp. 209–224. In: Noback, C. and Montagna, W., eds. The Primate Brain. Advances in Primatology. Vol. 1. Appleton-Century-Crofts; New York.Google Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1971. An example of parallelism in carnivore brain evolution. Evolution. 25:518–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radinsky, L. 1973a. Evolution of the canid brain. Brain, Behav., Evol. 7:169–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radinsky, L. 1973b. Are stink badgers skunks? Implications of neuroanatomy for mustelid phylogeny. J. Mammal. 54:585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1974. The fossil evidence of anthropoid brain evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthro. 41:15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1975a. Evolution of the felid brain. Brain, Behav., Evol. 11:214–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radinsky, L. 1975b. Viverrid neuroanatomy: phylogenetic and behavioral implications. J. Mammal. 56:130–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radinsky, L. 1976. The brain of Mesonyx, a Middle Eocene condylarth. Fieldiana, Geol. 13:323–337.Google Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1978. Evolution of brain size in carnivores and ungulates. Am. Nat. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. 3rd ed.468 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Sacher, G. 1970. Allometric and factorial analysis of brain structure in insectivores and primates. Pp. 245–287. In: Noback, C. and Montagna, W., eds. The Primate Brain. Advances in Primatology. Vol. 1. Appleton-Century-Crofts; New York.Google Scholar
Savage, D. E. 1975. Cenozoic—the primate episode. Pp. 2–27. In: Szalay, F., ed. Approaches to Primate Paleobiology. Contrib. Primatol. Vol. 5. Karger; Basel.Google Scholar
Savage, R. J. G. 1973. Megistotherium, gigantic hyaenodont from Miocene of Gebel Zelten, Libya. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.). Geol. 22:483–511.Google Scholar
Scott, W. B. 1888. On some new and little known creodonts. J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia. 9:155–185.Google Scholar
Scott, W. B. and Jepsen, G. L. 1936–1941. The mammalian fauna of the White River Oligocene. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. (N.S.). 28:1–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. 1964. Mammals of the World. 3 vols. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press; Baltimore.Google Scholar
Welker, W. I. and Campos, G. B. 1963. Physiological significance of sulci in somatic sensory cerebral cortex in mammals of the family Procyonidae. J. Comp. Neurol. 120:19–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wortman, J. 1894. Osteology of Patriofelis, a Middle Eocene creodont. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 6(5):129–164.Google Scholar