Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:17:34.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biogeography of origin and radiation: dendrasterid sand dollars in the northeastern Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Steven C. Beadle
Steven C. Beadle*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under favorable circumstances, biogeographic and biostratigraphic data can be combined to identify accurately the time and place of origin of a given taxon, and to reconstruct the pattern of its subsequent radiation. This study considers the dendrasterid sand dollars, which are abundant today along the Pacific Coast of North America. The Neogene sand dollar record in this region is particularly good; in fact, sand dollars have traditionally been used as provincial index fossils.

The dendrasterids originated in central California at the end of the Miocene; the oldest forms are dated at about 6.0–6.5 Ma. They spread south to Baja California during the Pliocene, and then north to Alaska during the Quaternary. This historical pattern is not an artifact of the record; it is consistent with independent paleogeographic evidence. The dendrasterids supplanted an older Mio-Pliocene sand dollar fauna; they are now completely dominant in the temperate coastal waters of the northeastern Pacific. They have reached this position in less than 7 m.y. since their first local appearance. The rapid rise of dendrasterids could be related to their aberrant morphology and behavior; these adaptations allow dendrasterids to suspension-feed, in a manner unique among living echinoids.

Dendrasterids are characterized by “eccentric” test morphologies. Even the oldest species are highly eccentric; transitional forms are unknown. The first dendrasterids appear suddenly in the provincial “Jacalitos Stage,” above an unconformity which represents no more than about 1 m.y. They do not occur in the underlying units, although other fossil sand dollars are abundant. The dendrasterids may have arisen rapidly, through a heterochronic change in the development of older, noneccentric forms. Recent ontogenetic studies have documented the feasibility of this process.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , Fall 1991 , pp. 325 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Addicott, W. O. 1969. Tertiary climatic change in the marginal northeastern Pacific Ocean. Science 165:583–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Addicott, W. O. 1970. Tertiary paleoclimatic trends in the San Joaquin basin, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 644-D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addicott, W. O. 1972. Provincial middle and late Tertiary molluscan stages, Temblor Range, California. Pp. 1–22. In Stinemeyer, E. H. (ed.), The Pacific Coast Miocene Biostratigraphic Symposium, Proceedings. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section; Bakersfield, California.Google Scholar
Addicott, W. O. 1984. Mid-Tertiary zoogeographic and paleogeographic discontinuities across the San Andreas Fault, California. Pp. 61–82. In Sylvester, A. G. (ed.), Wrench Fault Tectonics. American Association of Petroleum Geologists; Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Addicott, W. O., and Emerson, W. K. 1959. Late Pleistocene invertebrates from Punta Cabras, Baja California, Mexico. American Museum Novitates 1925.Google Scholar
Addicott, W. O., and Galehouse, J. S. 1973. Pliocene marine fossils in the Paso Robles Formation, California. United States Geological Survey, Journal of Research 1:509–514.Google Scholar
Adegoke, O. S. 1969. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the marine Neogene formations of the Coalinga region, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 80.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. M., and Martin, B. 1914. Neocene record in the Temblor basin, California, and Neocene deposits of the San Juan district, San Luis Obispo County. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 4th series 4:15–112.Google Scholar
Armentrout, J. M., Echols, R. J., and Ingle, J. C. Jr. 1984. Neogene biostratigraphic-chronostratigraphic scale for the northeastern Pacific Margin. Pp. 171–177. In Ikebe, N., and Tsuchi, R. (eds.), Pacific Neogene Datum Planes, Contributions to Biostratigraphy and Chronology. University of Tokyo; Tokyo.Google Scholar
Barron, J. A. 1986. Paleoceanographic and tectonic controls on deposition of the Monterey Formation and related siliceous rocks in California. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 53:27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadle, S. C. 1989. Ontogenetic regulatory mechanisms, heterochrony, and eccentricity in dendrasterid sand dollars. Paleobiology 15:205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, C. H. 1948. Reconnaissance of the geology and oil possibilities of Baja California, Mexico. Geological Society of America, Memoir 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, O. E. 1966. Stratigraphy, structure and oil possibilities in Monterey and Salinas Quadrangles, California. Pp. 48–67. In Rennie, E. W. Jr. (ed.), A Symposium of Papers. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Pacific Section, 40th Annual Convention; Bakersfield, California.Google Scholar
Brusca, R. C. 1980. Common Intertidal Invertebrates of the Gulf of California. Second edition. University of Arizona; Tucson.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. 1915. Fauna of the San Pablo Group of middle California. University of California, Publications in Geology 8:385–572.Google Scholar
Clark, H. L. 1935. Some new echinoderms from California. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 10th series 15:120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. L. 1948. A report on the echini of the warmer eastern Pacific, based on the collections of the Velero III. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 8:225–352.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. 1981. Stratigraphy, paleontology, and geology of the central Santa Cruz Mountains, California Coast Ranges. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, W. H. 1954. Tertiary basins of southern California. Pp. 73–83. In Jahns, R. H. (ed.), Geology of Southern California. California Division of Mines, Bulletin 170, Chapter 3: Historical Geology.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. C., Touring, R. M., and Brabb, E. E. 1962. Geology of the northern Santa Cruz Mountains, California. California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 181:179–220.Google Scholar
Dibblee, T. W. Jr. 1966. Evidence for cumulative offset on the San Andreas fault in central and northern California. Pp. 375–384. In Bailey, E. H. (ed.), Geology of Northern California. California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 190.Google Scholar
Dickinson, W. R., and Lowe, D. R. 1966. Stratigraphic relations of phosphate- and gypsum-bearing upper Miocene strata, upper Sespe Creek, Ventura County, California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Bulletin 50:2464–2470.Google Scholar
Durham, D. L. 1968. Geology of the Tierra Redonda Mountain and Bradley Quadrangles, Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties, California. United States Geological Survey, Bulletin 1255.Google Scholar
Durham, D. L., and Addicott, W. O. 1965. Pancho Rico Formation, Salinas Valley, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 524-A.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1949. Dendraster elsmerensis Durham, n. sp. American Journal of Science 247:49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1950. Megascopic paleontology and marine stratigraphy. In 1940 E. W. Scripps Cruise to the Gulf of California. Geological Society of America, Memoir 43, Part 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1955. Classification of clypeasteroid echinoids. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 31:73–198.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1959. Scutellaster oregonensis in the Pacific Coast Pliocene (abstract). Geological Society of America, Bulletin 70:1715–1716.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1963. Echinoid Scutellaster in the Pacific Coast Cenozoic (abstract). Geological Society of America, Special Paper 73:37.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1966. Clypeasteroids. Pp. U450–U491. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas; Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1978. Polymorphism in the Pliocene sand dollar Merriamaster (Echinoidea). Journal of Paleontology 52:275–286.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W., and Morgan, S. R. 1978. New sand dollars (Echinoidea) of the genera Merriamaster and Dendraster from the Purisima Formation, California. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 4th series 41:297–305.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W., and Wolfe, J. A. 1958. Joint occurrence of Dendraster and Scutellaster (Anorthoscutum) (abstract). Geological Society of America, Bulletin 69:1682–1683.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W., Wagner, C. D., and Abbott, D. P. 1980. Echinoidea: the sea urchins. Pp. 160–176. In Morris, R. H., Abbott, D. P., and Haderlie, E. C. (eds.), Intertidal Invertebrates of California. Stanford University; Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. E., Grant, U. S. IV, and Allen, H. B. 1941. Miocene of Caliente Range and environs, California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Bulletin 25:193–262.Google Scholar
Emerson, W. K. 1980. Invertebrate faunules of late Pleistocene age, with zoogeographic implications, from Turtle Bay, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Nautilus 94:67–89.Google Scholar
Emerson, W. K., and Hertlein, L. G. 1960. Pliocene and Pleistocene invertebrates from Punta Rosalía, Baja California, Mexico. American Museum Novitates 2004.Google Scholar
Emerson, W. K., and Hertlein, L. G. 1964. Invertebrate megafossils of the Belvedere Expedition to the Gulf of California. San Diego Society of Natural History, Transactions 13:333–368.Google Scholar
Ensley, R. A., and Verosub, K. L. 1982. Biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy of southern Ridge Basin, central Transverse Ranges, California. Pp. 13–24. In Crowell, J. C., and Link, M. H. (eds.), Geologic History of Ridge Basin, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section; Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
Faustman, W. R. 1964. Paleontology of the Wildcat Group at Scotia and Centerville Beach, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 41:97–160.Google Scholar
Galloway, A. J. 1977. Geology of the Point Reyes Peninsula, Marin County, California. California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 202.Google Scholar
Gester, G. C. 1917. Geology of a portion of the McKittrick District, a typical example of the west side San Joaquin Valley oil fields, and a correlation of the oil sands of the west side fields. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 4th series 7:207–227.Google Scholar
Ghiold, J. 1984. Adaptive shifts in clypeasteroid evolution—feeding strategies in the soft-bottom realm. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 169:41–73.Google Scholar
Glen, W. 1959. Pliocene and lower Pleistocene of the western part of the San Francisco peninsula. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 36:147–198.Google Scholar
Grant, U. S. IV, and Hertlein, L. G. 1938. The West American Cenozoic Echinoidea. University of California at Los Angeles, Publications in Mathematical and Physical Sciences 2.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. Jr. 1958. Geology and paleontology of the Pleasanton area, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 34:1–90.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. Jr. 1962. Evolution of the echinoid genus Astrodapsis. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 40:47–180.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. Jr., and Corbató, C. E. 1967. Stratigraphy and structure of Mesozoic and Cenozoic rocks, Nipomo Quadrangle, southern Coast Ranges, California. Geological Society of America, Bulletin 78:559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertlein, L. G., and Emerson, W. K. 1956. Marine Pleistocene invertebrates from near Puerto Peñasco, Sonora, Mexico. San Diego Society of Natural History, Transactions 12:154–176.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L. G., and Grant, U. S. IV. 1960. The geology and paleontology of the marine Pliocene of San Diego, California. Paleontology (Coelenterata, Bryozoa, Brachiopoda, Echinodermata). San Diego Society of Natural History, Memoir 2, Part 2a.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. 1981. Morphology and classification of Euechinoidea Bronn, 1860—a cladistic analysis. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 143:7–99.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. K., and Hertlein, L. G. 1926. Contribution to the geology and paleontology of the Tertiary of Cedros Island and adjacent parts of Lower California. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 4th series 15:409–464.Google Scholar
Kew, W.S.W. 1920. Cretaceous and Cenozoic Echinoidea of the Pacific Coast Region of North America. University of California, Publications in Geology 12:23–236.Google Scholar
Kew, W.S.W. 1924. Geology and oil resources of a part of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, California. United States Geological Survey, Bulletin 753.Google Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1977. The poor fossil record of the regular echinoid. Paleobiology 3:168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1982. Rapid evolution in echinoids. Palaeontology 25:1–9.Google Scholar
Kilmer, F. H. 1953. Stratigraphy of the “Diablo Formation.” Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Department of Paleontology, University of California. Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Kohl, R. F. 1974. A new late Pleistocene fauna from Humboldt County, California. Veliger 17:211–219.Google Scholar
Manning, G. A., and Ogle, B. A. 1950. Geology of the Blue Lake quadrangle, California. California Division of Mines, Bulletin 148.Google Scholar
Martin, B. 1916. The Pliocene of middle and northern California. University of California, Publications in Geology 9:215–259.Google Scholar
Merriam, J. C. 1898. The distribution of the Neocene sea-urchins of middle California and its bearing on the classification of the Neocene formations. University of California, Publications in Geology 2:109–118.Google Scholar
Merrill, R. J., and Hobson, E. S. 1970. Field observations of Dendraster excentricus, a sand dollar of western North America. American Midland Naturalist 83:595–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooi, R. 1987. A cladistic analysis of the sand dollars (Clypeasteroida: Scutellina) and the interpretation of heterochronic phenomena. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Zoology, University of Toronto. Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Mooi, R. 1989. Living and fossil genera of the Clypeasteroida (Echinoidea: Echinodermata): an illustrated key and annotated checklist. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 488:1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooi, R. 1990. Paedomorphosis, Aristotle's lantern, and the origins of the sand dollars (Echinodermata: Clypeasteroida). Paleobiology 16:25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, J. G., Kastendiek, J. E., Harrington, A., and Davis, N. 1985. Organization and patterns of interactions in a subtidal sand community on an exposed coast. Marine Ecology Progress Series 27:163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisiyama, S. 1968. The echinoid fauna from Japan and adjacent regions, Part II. Paleontological Society of Japan, Special Paper 13.Google Scholar
Nomland, J. O. 1917. Fauna of the Santa Margarita beds in the north Coalinga region of California. University of California, Publications in Geology 10:293–326.Google Scholar
Poore, R. Z., Barron, J. A., and Addicott, W. O. 1984. Biochronology of the Northern Pacific Miocene. Pp. 165–169. In Ikebe, N., and Tsuchi, R. (eds.), Pacific Neogene Datum Planes, Contributions to Biostratigraphy and Chronology. University of Tokyo; Tokyo.Google Scholar
Pressler, E. D. 1929. The Fernando Group in the Las Posas-South Mountain District, Ventura County, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 18:325–345.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1956. Dendraster: a problem in echinoid taxonomy. Journal of Paleontology 30:685–694.Google Scholar
Reagan, A. B. 1917. Archaeological notes on western Washington and adjacent British Columbia. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 4th series 7:1–31.Google Scholar
Richards, G. L. Jr. 1936. Astrodapsis faunal zones of California upper Miocene and lower Pliocene formations (abstract). Geological Society of America, Proceedings 1935:412–413.Google Scholar
Rowland, R. W. 1972. Paleontology and paleoecology of the San Diego Formation in northwestern Baja California. San Diego Society of Natural History, Transactions 17:25–32.Google Scholar
Santillán, M., and Barrera, T. 1930. Las posibilidades petrolíferas en la costa occidental de la Baja California, entre los paralelos 30° y 32° de latitud norte. Instituto Geologico de Mexico, Anales 5:1–37.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1979. Constructional morphology of sand dollars. Paleobiology 5:191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1984. Echinoid Palaeobiology. Allen and Unwin; London.Google Scholar
Smith, J. P. 1919. Climatic relations of the Tertiary and Quaternary faunas of the California Region. California Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 4th series 9:123–173.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. J. Jr. 1966. Megafauna of the upper Miocene Castaic Formation, Los Angeles County, California. Journal of Paleontology 40:21–40.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. J. Jr., and Dodd, J. R. 1976. Pliocene biostratigraphy and depositional environment of the Jacalitos Canyon area, California. Pp. 85–94. In Fritsche, A. E., Ter Best, H. Jr., and Wornardt, W. W. (eds.), The Neogene Symposium. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, 51st Annual Meeting; San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Timko, P. L. 1976. Sand dollars as suspension-feeders: a new description of feeding in Dendraster excentricus. Biological Bulletin 151:247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trask, P. D. 1926. Geology of Point Sur quadrangle, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences 16:119–186.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1966. Numerical analysis of marine molluscan ranges on the extratropical northeastern Pacific shelf. Limnology and Oceanography 11:198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1989. How good was the fossil record? Clues from the Californian Pleistocene. Paleobiology 15:83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, C. D. 1970. Evolution among some clypeasteroid echinoids. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Paleontology, University of California. Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Wagner, C. D. 1974. Fossil and Recent sand dollar echinoids of Alaska. Journal of Paleontology 48:105–123.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1943. Paleontology of the marine Tertiary Formations of Oregon and Washington. University of Washington, Publications in Geology 5.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1949. Geology of the Coast Ranges immediately north of the San Francisco Bay region, California. Geological Society of America, Memoir 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. E., and The Western Cenozoic Subcommittee. 1944. Correlation of the marine Cenozoic formations of western North America. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 55:569–598.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. W., and Meyer, G. L. 1969. Stratigraphy of northeastern Santa Cruz Island. Pp. 95–104. In Weaver, D. W., Doerner, D. P., and Nolf, B. (eds.), Geology of the Northern Channel Islands. American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Sections; Bakersfield, California.Google Scholar
Wilson, I. F. 1943. Geology of the San Benito quadrangle, California. California Journal of Mines and Geology 39:183–270.Google Scholar
Winterer, E. L., and Durham, D. L. 1962. Geology of the southeastern Ventura basin, Los Angeles County, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 334-H:275–366.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P., and Bramlette, M. N. 1950. Geology and paleontology of the Santa Maria district, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodring, W. P., Stewart, R., and Richards, R. W. 1940. Geology of the Kettleman Hills oil field, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 195.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P., Bramlette, M. N., and Kew, W.S.W. 1946. Geology and paleontology of Palos Verdes Hills, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 207.Google Scholar
Wornardt, W. W. 1972. Late Miocene and early Pliocene correlations in the California province. Pp. 284–333. In Stinemeyer, E. H. (ed.), The Pacific Coast Miocene Biostratigraphic Symposium, Proceedings. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section; Bakersfield, California.Google Scholar