Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:31:45.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Were bivalves ecologically dominant over brachiopods in the late Paleozoic? A test using exceptionally preserved fossil assemblages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Shannon Hsieh Open the ORCID record for Shannon Hsieh [Opens in a new window] ,
Andrew M. Bush  and
J Bret Bennington
Shannon Hsieh
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3043, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected].
Andrew M. Bush
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3043, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]
J Bret Bennington
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Environment, and Sustainability, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interpreting changes in ecosystem structure from the fossil record can be challenging. In a prominent example, the traditional view that brachiopods were ecologically dominant over bivalves in the Paleozoic has been disputed on both taphonomic and metabolic grounds. Aragonitic bivalves may be underrepresented in many fossil assemblages due to preferential dissolution. Abundance counts may further understate the ecological importance of bivalves, which tend to have more biomass and higher metabolic rates than brachiopods. We evaluate the relative importance of the two clades in exceptionally preserved, bulk-sampled fossil assemblages from the Pennsylvanian Breathitt Formation of Kentucky, where aragonitic bivalves are preserved as shells, not molds. At the regional scale, brachiopods were twice as abundant as bivalves and were collectively equivalent in biomass and energy use. Analyses of samples from the Paleobiology Database that contain abundance counts are consistent with these results and show no clear trend in the relative ecological importance of bivalves during the middle and late Paleozoic. Bivalves were probably more important in Paleozoic ecosystems than is apparent in many fossil assemblages, but they were not clearly dominant over brachiopods until after the Permian–Triassic extinction, which caused the shelly benthos to shift from bivalve and brachiopod dominated to merely bivalve dominated.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 265 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607, U.S.A.

Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.q0f84nh

References

Literature Cited

Aberhan, M., Kiessling, W., and Fursich, F. T.. 2006. Testing the role of biological interactions in the evolution of mid-Mesozoic marine benthic ecosystems. Paleobiology 32:259–277.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1859. An essay on classification. Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, Roberts, London.Google Scholar
Allmon, W. D., and Martin, R. E.. 2014. Seafood through time revisited: the Phanerozoic increase in marine trophic resources and its macroevolutionary consequences. Paleobiology 40:256–287.Google Scholar
Alroy, J. 2010. The shifting balance of diversity among major marine animal groups. Science 329:1191–1194.Google Scholar
Alroy, J. 2014. Accurate and precise estimates of origination and extinction rates. Paleobiology 40:374–397.Google Scholar
Balseiro, D., Sterren, A. F., and Cisterna, G.. 2014. Coexistence of brachiopod and bivalves in the Late Paleozoic of Western Argentina. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 414:133–145.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1993. Seafood through time—changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology 19:372–397.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K., and Bennington, J. B.. 1996. Do communities evolve? A major question in evolutionary paleoecology. Pp. 123–160 in Jablonski, D., Erwin, D. H., and Lipps, J. H., eds. Evolutionary paleobiology: in honor of James W. Valentine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Bennington, J. B. 1995. Community persistence and the pattern of community variability over time: a test using fossil assemblages from four marine transgressions in the Breathitt Formation (Middle Pennsylvanian) of Eastern Kentucky. Ph.D. dissertation. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va.Google Scholar
Bennington, J. B., and Bambach, R. K.. 1996. Statistical testing for paleocommunity recurrence: are similar fossil assemblages ever the same? Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 127:107–133.Google Scholar
Bonelli, J. R., Brett, C. E., Miller, A. I., and Bennington, J. B.. 2006. Testing for faunal stability across a regional biotic transition: quantifying stasis and variation among recurring coral-rich biofacies in the Middle Devonian Appalachian Basin. Paleobiology 32:20–37.Google Scholar
Brand, U. 1983. Mineralogy and chemistry of the lower Pennsylvanian Kendrick Fauna, eastern Kentucky, USA. 3. Diagenetic and paleoenvironmental analysis. Chemical Geology 40:167–181.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., and Bambach, R. K.. 2004. Did alpha diversity increase during the Phanerozoic? Lifting the veils of taphonomic, latitudinal, and environmental biases. Journal of Geology 112:625–642.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., and Bambach, R. K.. 2011. Paleoecologic megatrends in marine metazoa. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 39:241–269.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., and Bambach, R. K.. 2015. Sustained Mesozoic–Cenozoic diversification of marine Metazoa: a consistent signal from the fossil record. Geology 43:979–982.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., and Brame, R. I.. 2010. Multiple paleoecological controls on the composition of marine fossil assemblages from the Frasnian (Late Devonian) of Virginia, with a comparison of ordination methods. Paleobiology 36:573–591.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., and Daley, G. M.. 2008. Comparative paleoecology of fossils and fossil assemblages. In Kelley, P. H. and Bambach, R. K., eds. From evolution to geobiology: research questions driving paleontology at the start of a new century. Paleontological Society Papers 14:289–317. Paleontological Society, Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., Pruss, S. B., and Payne, J. L.. 2013. Ecosystem paleobiology and geobiology: connecting the biological and earth systems. Paleontological Society Papers 19, xi–xiv.Google Scholar
Bush, A. M., Hunt, G., and Bambach, R. K.. 2016. Sex and the shifting biodiversity dynamics of marine animals in deep time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113:14073–14078.Google Scholar
Butts, S. H. 2014. Silicification. In Laflamme, M., Schiffbauer, J. D., and Darroch, S. A. F., eds. Reading and writing of the fossil record: preservational pathways to exceptional fossilization. Paleontological Society Papers 20:15–33. Paleontological Society, Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Cherns, L., Wheeley, J. R., and Wright, V. P.. 2008. Taphonomic windows and molluscan preservation. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 270:220–229.Google Scholar
Cherns, L., and Wright, V. P.. 2000. Missing molluscs as evidence of large-scale early skeletal aragonite dissolution in a Silurian sea. Geology 28:791–794.Google Scholar
Cherns, L., and Wright, V. P.. 2009. Quantifying the impacts of early diagenetic aragonite dissolution on the fossil record. Palaios 24:756–771.Google Scholar
Chesnut, D. R. Jr. 1989. Pennsylvanian rocks of the eastern Kentucky coal field. Pp. 57–64 in Cecil, C. B. and Eble, C., eds. Carboniferous geology of the eastern United States, Vol. 143. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Clapham, M. E. 2015. Ecological consequences of the Guadalupian extinction and its role in the brachiopod-mollusk transition. Paleobiology 41:266–279.Google Scholar
Clapham, M. E., Bottjer, D. J., Powers, C. M., Bonuso, N., Fraiser, M. L., Marenco, P. J., Dornbos, S. Q., and Pruss, S. B.. 2006. Assessing the ecological dominance of Phanerozoic marine invertebrates. Palaios 21:431–441.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austral Ecology 18:117–143.Google Scholar
Finnegan, S. 2013. Quantifying seafood through time: counting calories in the fossil record. Paleontological Society Papers 19:21–49.Google Scholar
Finnegan, S., and Droser, M. L.. 2008. Body size, energetics, and the Ordovician restructuring of marine ecosystems. Paleobiology 34:342–359.Google Scholar
Finnegan, S., McClain, C. M., Kosnik, M. A., and Payne, J. L.. 2011. Escargots through time: an energetic comparison of marine gastropod assemblages before and after the Mesozoic Marine Revolution. Paleobiology 37:252–269.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2010. The geological history of biodiversity. Pp. 479–510 in Bell, M. A., ed. Evolution since Darwin: the first 150 years. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
Foote, M., Crampton, J.S., Beu, A.G., and Nelson, C.S.. 2015. Aragonite bias, and lack of bias, in the fossil record: lithological, environmental, and ecological controls. Paleobiology 41:245–265.Google Scholar
Foote, M., and Sepkoski, J. J.. 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature 398:415–417.Google Scholar
Frechette, M., and Lefaivre, D.. 1990. Discriminating between food and space limitation in benthic suspension feeders using self-thinning relationships. Marine Ecology Progress Series 65:15–23.Google Scholar
Gillooly, J. F., Brown, J. H., West, G. B., Savage, V. M., and Charnov, E. L.. 2001. Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293:2248–2251.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Calloway, C. B.. 1980. Clams and brachiopods—ships that pass in the night. Paleobiology 6:383–396.Google Scholar
Hastings, A., Byers, J. E., Crooks, J. A., Cuddington, K., Jones, C. G., Lambrinos, J. G., Talley, T. S., and Wilson, W. G.. 2007. Ecosystem engineering in space and time. Ecology Letters 10:153–164.Google Scholar
Hendy, A. J. W. 2009. The influence of lithification on Cenozoic marine biodiversity trends. Paleobiology 35:51–62.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., Miller, A. I., Meyer, D. L., and Dattilo, B. F.. 2001. The detection and importance of subtle biofacies within a single lithofacies: the Upper Ordovician Kope Formation of the Cincinnati, Ohio region. Palaios 16:205–217.Google Scholar
Honaker, J., King, G., and Blackwell, M.. 2011. Amelia II: a program for missing data. Journal of Statistical software 45:1–47.Google Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M.. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386.Google Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M.. 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957.Google Scholar
Jordan, N., Allison, P. A., Hill, J., and Sutton, M. D.. 2015. Not all aragonitic molluscs are missing: taphonomy and significance of a unique shelly lagerstatte from the Jurassic of SW Britain. Lethaia 48:540–548.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 2005. Shell composition has no net impact on large-scale evolutionary patterns in mollusks. Science 307:914–917.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H., and Follows, M. J.. 2016. A bottom-up perspective on ecosystem change in Mesozoic oceans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 283(1841). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1755.Google Scholar
Koch, C. F., and Sohl, N. F.. 1983. Preservational effects in paleoecological studies—Cretaceous mollusk examples. Paleobiology 9:26–34.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Kiessling, W., Aberhan, M., Fursich, F. T., Scarponi, D., Wood, S. L. B., and Hoffmeister, A. P.. 2006. Ecological, taxonomic, and taphonomic components of the post-Paleozoic increase in sample-level species diversity of marine benthos. Paleobiology 32:533–561.Google Scholar
Liow, L. H., Reitan, T., and Harnik, P. G.. 2015. Ecological interactions on macroevolutionary time scales: clams and brachiopods are more than ships that pass in the night. Ecology Letters 18:1030–1039.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1960. The emergence of evolutionary novelties. Evolution after Darwin 1:349–380.Google Scholar
McAlester, A. L. 1962. Mode of preservation in early Paleozoic pelecypods and its morphologic and ecologic significance. Journal of Paleontology 36:69–73.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I., and Sepkoski, J. J.. 1988. Modeling bivalve diversification—the effect of interaction on a macroevolutionary system. Paleobiology 14:364–369.Google Scholar
Minchin, P. R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107.Google Scholar
Mondal, S., and Harries, P. J.. 2016. The effect of taxonomic corrections on Phanerozoic generic richness trends in marine bivalves with a discussion on the clade's overall history. Paleobiology 42:157–171.Google Scholar
Parkhaev, P. Y. 2008. The early Cambrian radiation of Mollusca. Pp. 33–69 in Ponder, W. F. and Lindberg, D. R., eds. Phylogeny and evolution of the mollusca 33. University of California Press, Oakland, Calif.Google Scholar
Payne, J. L., Heim, N. A., Knope, M. L., and McClain, C. R.. 2014. Metabolic dominance of bivalves predates brachiopod diversity decline by more than 150 million years. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 281:20133122.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., Staff, G. M., Stanton, R. J., and Callender, W. R.. 2001. Application of trophic transfer efficiency and age structure in the trophic analysis of fossil assemblages. Lethaia 34:97–118.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., and Stanton, R. J.. 1985. Estimating biomass and energy-flow of mollusks in paleo-communities. Palaeontology 28:1–34.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., and Stanton, R. J.. 1996. The application of size-frequency distribution and energy flow in paleoecologic analysis: an example using parautochthonous death assemblages from a variable salinity bay. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 124:195–231.Google Scholar
Pruss, S. B., Payne, J. L., and Westacott, S.. 2015. Taphonomic bias of selective silicification revealed by paired petrographic and insoluble residue analysis. Palaios 30:620–626.Google Scholar
Rodland, D. L., Simoes, M. G., Krause, R. A., and Kowalewski, M.. 2014. Stowing away on ships that pass in the night: sclerobiont assemblages on individually dated bivalve and brachiopod shells from a subtropical shelf. Palaios 29:170–183.Google Scholar
Scarponi, D., and Kowalewski, M.. 2004. Stratigraphic paleoecology: bathymetric signatures and sequence overprint of mollusk associations from upper Quaternary sequences of the Po Plain, Italy. Geology 32:989–992.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. L. 1997. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R., and McKerrow, W. S.. 1990. Revised world maps and introduction. Geological Society of London Memoir 12:1–21.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, . 1996. Competition in macroevolution: the double wedge revisited. Pp. 211–255 in Valentine, J. W., Jablonski, D., Erwin, D. H., and Lipps, J. H., eds. Evolutionary paleobiology: in honor of James W. Valentine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Sessa, J. A., Patzkowsky, M. E., and Bralower, T. J.. 2009. The impact of lithification on the diversity, size distribution, and recovery dynamics of marine invertebrate assemblages. Geology 37:115–118.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J., and Rodgers, J. C.. 2010. Competition between a Pennsylvanian (Late Carboniferous) edrioasteroid and a bryozoan for living space on a brachiopod. Journal of Paleontology 84:356–359.Google Scholar
Staff, G., Powell, E. N., Stanton, R. J., and Cummins, H.. 1985. Biomass—is it a useful tool in paleocommunity reconstruction. Lethaia 18:209–232.Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovic, H. M. 1979. The physiological differences between articulate brachiopods and filter-feeding bivalves as a factor in the evolution of marine level-bottom communities. Palaeontology 22:101–134.Google Scholar
Sterren, A. F., and Cisterna, G. A.. 2010. Bivalves and brachiopods in the Carboniferous–Early Permian of Argentine Precordillera: diversification and faunal turnover in southwestern Gondwana. Geologica Acta 8:501–517.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D., and Wilson, M. A.. 2003. Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth-Science Reviews 62:1–103.Google Scholar
Tomasovych, A. 2006. Brachiopod and bivalve ecology in the late Triassic (Alps, Austria): onshore-offshore replacements caused by variations in sediment and nutrient supply. Palaios 21:344–368.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., Jablonski, D., Kidwell, S., and Roy, K.. 2006. Assessing the fidelity of the fossil record by using marine bivalves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:6599–6604.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1995. Economics, volcanos, and phanerozoic revolutions. Paleobiology 21:125–152.Google Scholar
Williams, A., and Carlson, S.. 2007. Affinities of brachiopods and trends in their evolution. Pp. 2822–2833 in Williams, A. et al. Brachiopoda 6, Supplement. Part H. Revised. Selden, P., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America, New York, and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Wright, P., Cherns, L., and Hodges, P.. 2003. Missing molluscs: field testing taphonomic loss in the Mesozoic through early large-scale aragonite dissolution. Geology 31:211–214.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E., White, J. Jr., and Gordon, M. Jr. 1967. Aragonite and calcite in mollusks from the Pennsylvanian Kendrick Shale. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575:76–78.Google Scholar