Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:56:28.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in the formation and detection of growth increments in bivalve shells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Walter W. Hughes  and
Conrad D. Clausen
Walter W. Hughes
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104
Conrad D. Clausen
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth increments in bivalve shells have been used in geophysics and paleoecology. However, little study has been given to the variability of increment patterns within and between shells. The variability of increment patterns is examined visually and quantitatively, with the help of a serial correlation computer program. Analyses of increment patterns of the bivalves Chione fluctifraga and Protothaca staminea (Veneridae) indicate that: 1) quantitative results complement the visual observations; 2) increments are not consistently detected during successive measurements; 3) a striking similarity exists between right and left valves of the same specimen; and 4) different specimens collected from the same natural environment do not show any one-to-one increment relationship—however, increment width trends may be present. The variation of increment patterns seen between specimens suggests caution in the use of bivalve increments in paleoecology.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , Fall 1980 , pp. 503 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baillie, M. G. L. and Pilcher, J. R. 1973. A simple crossdating program for tree-ring research. Tree-Ring Bull. 33:7–14.Google Scholar
Berta, A. 1976. An investigation of individual growth and possible age relationships in a population of Protothaca staminea (Mollusca: Pelecypoda). PaleoBios. No. 21. 25 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, G. R. II. 1968. Mollusk shell: daily growth lines. Science. 161:800–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, G. R. II. 1969. Shell characteristics of the family Pectinidae as environmental indicators. 101 pp. Ph.D. thesis. Calif. Inst. Technol., Pasadena, California.Google Scholar
Clark, G. R. II. 1974. Growth lines in invertebrate skeletons. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2:77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, D. M. 1975. Growth lines in Chione fluctifraga and Protothaca staminea (Bivalvia): precision of counting and comparisons of size, age, intertidal location and taxa. 51 pp. Ph.D. Dissertation. Loma Linda Univ., California.Google Scholar
Dodge, R. E. and Thomson, J. 1974. The natural radiochemical and growth records in contemporary hermatypic corals from the Atlantic and Caribbean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 23:313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolman, J. 1975. A technique for the extraction of environmental and geophysical information from growth records in invertebrates and stromatolites. pp. 191–221. In: Rosenberg, G. D. and Runcorn, S. K., eds. Growth Rhythms and the History of the Earth's Rotation. John Wiley and Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1972. Tidal growth increments in the cockle Clinocardium nuttalli. Science. 176:416–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrow, G. E. 1971. Periodicity structures in the bivalve shell: experiments to establish growth controls in Cerastoderma edule from the Thames estuary. Palaeontology. 14:571–588.Google Scholar
Farrow, G. E. 1972. Periodicity structures in the bivalve shell: analysis of stunting in Cerastoderma edule from the Burrey inlet (South Wales). Palaeontology. 15:61–72.Google Scholar
Fritts, H. C. 1963. Computer programs for tree-ring research. Tree-Ring Bull. 25(3):2–7.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. Jr., Dollase, W. A., and Corbato, C. E. 1974. Shell growth in Tivela stultorum (Mawe, 1823) and Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia): annual periodicity, latitudinal differences, and diminution with age. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 15:33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, W. W. 1978. Consistency of growth increment patterns in bivalve shells. 104 pp. Ph.D. Dissertation. Loma Linda Univ., California.Google Scholar
Hughes, W. W. 1979. Growth increment consistency within single bivalve mollusc shells. J. Paleontol. 53(3):736–738.Google Scholar
Pannella, G. 1972. Paleontological evidence on the Earth's rotational history since early Precambrian. Astrophy. Space Sci. 16:212–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannella, G. and MacClintock, C. 1968. Biological and environmental rhythms reflected in molluscan shell growth. J. Paleontol. 42 (Supplement to No. 5, Memoir 2):64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, G. D. 1972. Patterned growth of the bivalve Chione undatella Sowerby relative to the environment. 220 pp. Ph.D. Dissertation. Univ. Calif., Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. D. and Jones, C. B. 1975. Approaches to chemical periodicites in molluscs and stromatolites. pp. 223–241. In: Rosenberg, G. D. and Runcorn, S. K., eds. Growth Rhythms and the History of the Earth's Rotation. John Wiley and Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1978. Periodic growth features in fossil organisms and the length of the day and month. pp. 154–196. In: Broche, P. and Sundermann, J., eds. Tidal Friction and the Earth's Rotation. Springer-Verlag; Berlin.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1963. Coral growth and geochronometry. Nature. 197:948–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenland, W. M. 1975. An objective method to identify missing or false rings. Tree-Ring Bull. 35:41–47.Google Scholar