Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:31:50.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of degraded and shade cocoa forests by Endangered golden-headed lion tamarins Leontopithecus chrysomelas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2004

Becky E. Raboy
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Present address: Department of Conservation Biology, Conservation and Research Center, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20008, USA
Mary C. Christman
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
James M. Dietz
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Determining habitat requirements for threatened primates is critical to implementing conservation strategies, and plans incorporating metapopulation structure require understanding the potential of available habitats to serve as corridors. We examined how three groups of golden-headed lion tamarins Leontopithecus chrysomelas in Southern Bahia, Brazil, used mature, swamp, secondary and shade cocoa (cabruca) forests. Unlike callitrichids that show affinities for degraded forest, Leontopithecus species are presumed to depend on primary or mature forests for sleeping sites in tree holes and epiphytic bromeliads for animal prey. In this study we quantified resource availability within each habitat, compared the proportion of time spent in each habitat to that based on availability, investigated preferences for sleeping site selection, and determined how golden-headed lion tamarins allocated time to foraging behaviour in different habitats. Each group preferred to range in certain habitats during the day, yet patterns were not consistent across groups. In contrast, all groups preferred to sleep in mature or cabruca forest. Golden-headed lion tamarins spent a greater proportion of time foraging and eating fruits, flowers and nectar in cabruca than in mature or secondary forests. Although the extent to which secondary and cabruca forests can completely sustain breeding groups is unresolved, we conclude that both habitats would make suitable corridors for the movement of tamarins between forest fragments, and that the large trees remaining in cabruca are important sources of food and sleeping sites. We suggest that management plans for golden-headed lion tamarins should focus on protecting areas that include access to tall forest, either as mature or cabruca, for the long-term conservation of the species.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2004 Fauna & Flora International