Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:20:39.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uneconomical game cropping in a community-based conservation project outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2002

Tomas Holmern
Affiliation:
Serengeti Regional Conservation Project, P.O. Box 32, Mugumu, Serengeti District, Tanzania Present address: Department of Zoology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail: [email protected]
Eivin Røskaft
Affiliation:
Serengeti Regional Conservation Project, P.O. Box 32, Mugumu, Serengeti District, Tanzania
Job Mbaruka
Affiliation:
Serengeti Regional Conservation Project, P.O. Box 32, Mugumu, Serengeti District, Tanzania
Samson Y. Mkama
Affiliation:
Serengeti Regional Conservation Project, P.O. Box 32, Mugumu, Serengeti District, Tanzania
John Muya
Affiliation:
Serengeti Regional Conservation Project, P.O. Box 32, Mugumu, Serengeti District, Tanzania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since 1993 the Serengeti Regional Conservation Project (SRCP) in Tanzania has conducted a game cropping operation (the commercial utilization of wild animal populations in natural habitats) in areas immediately outside the Serengeti National Park in order to provide adjacent villages with incentives to abstain from illegal hunting. In this study we carry out a comparative economic analysis of the SRCP cropping operation and illegal hunting. The extent of illegal hunting was mapped by utilising questionnaires distributed to Village Game Scouts employed in five of the Project villages. Our research indicates that the cropping operation is not economically sustainable and makes only a minor economic contribution to the Project villages compared to illegal hunting. Furthermore, cropping quotas are small, utilization of quotas low, and the level of community involvement limited. Illegal hunting was extensive around both Project and other villages. We suggest that SRCP discard the inefficient cropping operation and instead concentrate on diversifying income opportunities for the Project villages.

Type
Articles
Copyright
2002 Fauna & Flora International
Supplementary material: PDF

Holmern et al. appendix

Supplementary appendix

Download Holmern et al. appendix(PDF)
PDF 31.2 KB