Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:43:10.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parks, reserves and primate conservation in Brazilian Amazonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Anthony Rylands  and
Russell Mittermeier
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1979 there was only one national park in the forested Amazon region of Brazil. In that year Brazil adopted a conservation plan for the Amazonian region, proposed in 1976 as part of a system of conservation units for the whole country. Since then a further four national parks and a number of biological reserves and ecological stations have been established. The plan, which gives priority to ecosystem protection, takes the geographic diversity of plant species into consideration but not that of the fauna. The authors examine the effectiveness of the plan in protecting the primate families Callitrichidae, Callimiconidae and Cebidae and suggest how it could be adapted by recognising the importance of rivers, which limit the distributions of many primate species and subspecies as well as those of many other mammals, birds and plants.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 78 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1983

References

Avila Pires, F.D. 1974. Caracterizaçāo zoogeográfica da Província Amazônica. II. A família Callitrichidae e a zoogeografia Amazônica. An. Acad. Bras. Ciénc. 46, 159–181.Google Scholar
Ayres, J.M. 1977. A situaçāo atual da área de ocorrência do cuxiú preto. Chiropotes satanas satanas (Hoffmannsegg, 1807). Unpublished manuscript. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia (INPA). Manaus, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ayres, J.M. and Best, R. 1979. Estratétegias para a conservaçāo da fauna Amazônica. Supl. Acta Amazonica, 9, 81–101.Google Scholar
Ayres, J.M. and Milton, K. 1981. Levantamentos de primatas e habitat no Rio Tapajòs. Bolm. Mus. Para. ‘Emilio Goeldi‘, 111, 1–11.Google Scholar
Ayres, J.M.. Mittermeier, R.A.. Constable, I.D. 1981. A distribuiçāo geográfica e situaçāo atual dos sagüis de cara nua (Saguinus bicolor). Bolm FBCN, 15, 62–68.Google Scholar
Barrett, S.W. 1978. Amazon National Park—master plan. World Wildlife Fund Yearbook. 1977–1978. pp. 174–175.Google Scholar
Braga, P.I.S. 1979. Subdivisāo fitogeográfica. tipos de vegetaçāo. conservaçāo e inventário floristico da floresta Amazônica. Supl. Acta Amazônica. 9, 53–80.Google Scholar
Branch, L. 1979. Primates of the Amazonia National Park (Tapajós). A final report. Brasilia, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal (IBDF).Google Scholar
Brazil, , 1975. II PND. Second National Development Plan. 1975–1979. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro (English translation).Google Scholar
Brown, K.S. (Jr) 1975. Geographical patterns of evolution in neotropical Lepidoptera. Systematics and derivation of known and new Heliconiini (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae). J. Ent.(B). 44, 201–242.Google Scholar
Brown, K.S. (Jr) 1976. Geographical patterns of evolution in neotropical forest Lepidoptera (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae and Nymphalinae-Heliconiini). In Biogéographie et Evolution en América Tropicale (Ed. H., Descimon). Pub. Lab. Zool. École Normale. Suppl. 9, 118–160.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J.C. de M. 1981. The conservation of nature and natural resources in the Brazilian Amazonia. CVRD-revista. Vol. 2, Special edition, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Ducke, A. and Black, G.A. 1954. Notas sobre a fitogeografia da Amazônia Brasileira. Bolm Téc. Inst. Agron. N. 29, 1–62.Google Scholar
Haffer, J. 1969. Speciation in Amazon forest birds. Science. 165, 131–137.Google Scholar
Hammen, T. van der. 1972. Changes in the vegetation and climate in the Amazon basin and surrounding area during the Pleistocene. Geol. Mijnb. 51, 641–643.Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1963. A systematic and zoogeographic account of the monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae) of the Amazonas and Orinoco river basins. Mammalia, 27, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. 1977. Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini) with an Introduction to the Primates. Vol. I. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.Google Scholar
Iucn, 1982. The IUCN Mammal Red Data Book, Part I, Threatened Mammalian Taxa of the Americas and Australasian Zoogeographic region (excluding Cetacea) (Compiled by Thornback, J. and Jenkins, M.). IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
Izawa, K. 1979. Studies on peculiar distribution pattern of Callimico. KyotoUniv. Overseas Research. Reports of New World Monkeys, 1–19.Google Scholar
Junk, W.J. 1979. Recursos hídricos da regiāo Amazônica: utilizaçāo e preservaçāo. Supl. Acta Amazônica, 9, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzey, W.G. 1982. Distribution of Primates and Forest Refuges. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics. pp. 455–482. (Ed. G.T., Prance). Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kinzey, W.G. and Gentry, A.H. 1979. Habitat utilization in two species of Callicebus. In Primate Ecology: Problemoriented Field Studies, pp. 89–106. (Ed. R.W., Sussman). Wiley. New York.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, T.E. 1982. Designing Refugia for Tomorrow. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics, pp. 673–680. (Ed. G.T., Prance). Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
MA-IBDF 1979. Piano do Sistema de Unidades de Conservaçāao do Brasil. Brasília, Ministry of Agriculture, Brazilian Forestry Development Institute (IBDF) and Brazilian Foundation for Nature Conservation (FBCN).Google Scholar
MA-IBDF 1980. Regulamento dos Parques Nacionais Brasileiros. Brasilia, Ministry of Agriculture and Brazilian Forestry Development Institute (IBDF), Decree No. 84.017 of 21.9.79.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A. 1973. Recommendations for the creation of national parks and biological reserves in the Amazonian region of Brazil, based on a four-month primate survey in the upper Amazon. Rio, Negro and Rio, Tapajos. Report to the New York Zoological Society and IBDF, Brazil.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Bailey, R.C. and Coimbra-Filho, A.F. 1978. Conservation status of the Callitrichidae in Brazilian Amazonia. Surinam and French Guiana. In Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae, pp. 137–146. (Ed. Kleiman, D.G.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A. and Coimbra-Filho, A.F. 1981. Systematics: species and subspecies. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates I, pp. 29–109. (Eds A.F., Coimbra-Filho and R.A., Mittermeier). Brazilian Academy of Sciences, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Coimbra-Filho, A.F. and Constable, I.D. 1980. Conservation of eastern Brazilian primates. WWF Project Rep. 1614, Report for the period 1979–1980.Google Scholar
Nogueira-Neto, P. and Carvalho, J.C. de M. 1979. A programme of ecological stations for Brazil. Environ. Conserv. 6, 95–104.Google Scholar
Oren, D. C. 1982. Testing the refuge model for South America: a hypothesis to evaluate discrepancies in refuges number across taxa. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics, pp. 601–607 (Ed. G.T., Prance), Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Padua, M.T.J. 1977. Áreas de preservaçāo: Parques Nacionais e Reservas Biologicas. Brasil Florestal, 8, 6–14.Google Scholar
Padua, M.T.J. and Carvalho, J.C. de M. 1979. New action in the field of conservation of nature in Brazil. Environ. Conserv. 6, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pires, J.M. 1974. Tipos de vegetaçāo da Amazônia. Brasil Florest, 5, 48–58.Google Scholar
Pires, J.M. and Prance, G.T. 1977. The Amazon forest: a natural heritage to be preserved. In Extinction is Forever, pp. 158–194 (Eds G.T., Prance and T.S., Elias). New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.Google Scholar
Pook, A. G. and Pook, G. 1979. A field study on the status and socioecology of the Goeldi's monkey (Callimico goeldii) and other primates in northern Bolivia. Report to the New York Zoological Society, New York.Google Scholar
Prance, G.T. 1973. Phytogeographic support for the theory of Pleistocene forest refuges in the Amazon basin, based on evidence from the distribution patterns in Caryocaraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Dichapetalaceae and Lecythidaceae. Acta Amazonica, 3, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prance, G.T. 1977. The phytogeographic subdivisions of Amazonia and their influence on the selection of biological reserves. In Extinction is Forever, pp. 195–212 (Eds Prance, G.T. and Elias, T.S.). New York Botanical Garden. Bronx.Google Scholar
Prance, G.T. 1978. The origin and evolution of the Amazon flora. Interciência. 3(4), 207–222.Google Scholar
Prance, G.T. (Ed.) 1982. Biological Diversification in the Tropics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rylands, A.B. 1980. A conservaçāo dos primates Amazônicos: uma análise dos parques. reservas e propostas para conservaçāo na Amazônia. Report to Brazilian Forestry Development Institute (IBDF), BraŹilia.Google Scholar
Tardin, A.T., Santos, A.P. dos.Lee, D.C.L.. Maia, F.C.S., Mendonça, F.J., Assuncao, C.V., Rodrigues, J.E.. Moura, A. de M., Novaes, R.A., Chen, S.C., Duarte, V. and Shimabukuro, Y.E. 1979. Levantamento de áreas de desmatamento na Amazônia Legal através de imagens de satélite LANDSAT. (INPE-COM. 3/NTE. C.D.U.621.38SR). Sāo José dos Campos, Sāo Paulo, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE).Google Scholar
Thorington, R.W. 1974. The relevance of vegetational diversity for primate conservation in South America. Symp. 5th Congr. Int. Primat. Soc. pp. 547–553. S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
Thorington, R.W. 1978. Some problems relevant to the conservation of Callitrichidae. Prim. Med. 10, 1–11.Google Scholar
Vanzolini, P.E. 1970. Zoologia, sistemática, geografia e a origem dasespécies. Inst. Geog. Univ. de Sāo Paulo, Teses Monogr. 3.Google Scholar
Vanzolini, P.E. and Williams, E.E. 1970. South American Anoles: the geographic differentiation and evolution of the Anolis chrysolepis spp. group (Sauri, Iguanidae). Arq. Zool. Sāo Paulo, 19, 1–28.Google Scholar
Wallace, A.R. 1853. The Geographical Distribution of Animals. Vols 1 and 2. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Wetterberg, G.B. and Padua, M.T.J. 1978. Preservaçāo da natureza na Amazônia Brasileira: situaçāo em 1978, Projeto de Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa Florestal (PRODEPEF). PNUD/FAO/IBDF/BRA–76–027. Série Técnica, 13, 45 pp.Google Scholar
Wetterberg, G.B., Padua, M.T.J., Castro, C.S. de and Vasconcellos, J.M.C. 1976. Uma análise de prioridades en conservaçāo da natureza na Amazônia. Projeto de Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa Florestal (PRODEPEF). PNUD/FAO/IBDF/BRA-45. Série Técnica, 8, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Anthony, B. Rylands, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Estrada do Aleixo, 1756, Caixa Postal 478, 69.000 Manaus-Amazonas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Russell, A. Mittermeier, WWF-US, 1601 Connecticut Avenue. NW, Washington, DC 20009: and Department of Anatomical Sciences. HSC. State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794. USA.Google Scholar