Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:17:55.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifing priority ecoregions for rodent conservation at the genus level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Giovanni Amori  and
Spartaco Gippoliti
Spartaco Gippoliti
Affiliation:
Evolutionary Genetics Centre, CNR, Via dei Sardi 50-00185, Rome, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Rodents account for 40 per cent of living mammal species. Nevertheless, despite an increased interest in biodiversity conservation and their high species richness, Rodentia are often neglected by conservationists. We attempt for the first time a world-wide evaluation of rodent conservation priorities at the genus level. Given the low popularity of the order, we considered it desirable to discuss identified priorities within the framework of established biodiversity priority areas of the world. Two families and 62 genera are recognized as threatened. Our analyses highlight the Philippines, New Guinea, Sulawesi, the Caribbean, China temperate forests and the Atlantic Forest of south-eastern Brazil as the most important (for their high number of genera) ‘threat-spots’ for rodent conservation. A few regions, mainly drylands, are singled out as important areas for rodent conservation but are not generally recognized in global biodiversity assessments. These are the remaining forests of Togo, extreme ‘western Sahel’, the Turanian and Mongolian-Manchurian steppes and the desert of the Horn of Africa. Resources for conservation must be allocated first to recognized threat spots and to those restricted-range genera which may depend on species-specific strategies for their survival.

Keywords

Biodiversityconservation prioritiesrodentsthreatened generaworld ecoregions
Type
Short Communication
Information
Oryx , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 158 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 2001

References

Amori, G. & Gippoliti, S. (2000) What do mammalogists want to save? Ten years of mammalian conservation biology. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, M.D. & Goodman, S.M. (1996) Systematic studies of Madagascar's endemic rodents (Muroidea: Nesomyinae): a new genus and species from the Central Highlands. In A Floral and Faunal Inventory of the Eastern Slopes of the Reserve Naturelle Intégrale d' Andringitra, Madagascar with Reference to Elevational Variation (ed. Goodman, S. M.), pp. 231–256. Fieldiana Zoology, n.s. 85, 1–319. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Carleton, M.D. & Goodman, S.M. (1998) New taxa of Nesomyine rodents (Muroidea: Muridae) from Madagascar's Northern Highlands, with taxonomic comments on previously described forms. In A Floral and Faunal Inventory of the Réserve Spéciale d' Anjanaharibe-Sud, Madagascar: With Reference to Elevational Variation (ed. Goodman, S. M.), pp. 163–200. Fieldiana Zoology, n.s. 90, 1–246. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Caro, T.M. & O'Doherty, G. (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 13, 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, G.B. & Hill, J.E. (1992) The Mammals of the Indomalayan Region. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dowler, R.C., Carroll, D.S. & Edwards, C.W. (2000) Rediscovery of rodents (Genus Nesoryzomys) considered extinct in the Galapagos Islands. Oryx, 34, 109–117.Google Scholar
Forget, P.-M. (1997) Effect of microhabitat on seed fate and seedling performance in two rodent-dispersed tree species in rain forest in French Guiana. Journal of Ecology, 85, 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, C.P. & Flannery, T. (1994) A revision of the genus Uromys Peters, 1867 (Muridae Mammalia) with description of two new species. Records Australian Museum, 46, 145–170.Google Scholar
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1985) The order Rodentia: major questions on their evolutionary origin, relationships, and suprafamiliar systematics. In Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents: A Multidisciplinary Analysis (eds Luckett, W. P. & Hartenberger, J.-L.), pp. 1–33. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
IUCN (1996) The 1996 IUCN Red List. IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
Krajewski, C. (1994) Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity: a comparison and critique. Biological Conservation, 69, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynam, A.J. & Billick, I. (1999) Differential responses of small mammals to fragmentation in a Thailand tropical forest. Biological Conservation, 91, 191–200.Google Scholar
Mares, M.A. (1992) Neotropical mammals and the myth of Amazonian diversity. Science, 255, 976–979.Google Scholar
Maser, C. & Maser, Z. (1988) Interactions among squirrels, mycorrhizal fungi and coniferous forests in Oregon. Great Basin Naturalist, 48, 358–369.Google Scholar
Miller, B., Ceballos, G. & Reading, R. (1994) The praire dog and biotic diversity. Conservation Biology, 8, 677–681.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A. (1988) Primate diversity and the tropical forest: case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of megadiversity countries. In Biodiversity (ed. Wilson, E. O.), pp. 145–154. National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Myers, N., Thomsen, J.B., da Fonseca, G. & Olivieri, S. (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conservation Biology, 12, 516–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. (1988) Threatened biotas: hotspots in tropical forests. Environmentalist, 8, 178–208.Google Scholar
Myers, N. (1990) The biodiversity challange: expanded hot-spot analysis. Environmentalist, 10, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, R.M. (1999) Walker's Mammals of the World, 6th edn.The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.M. & Dinerstein, E. (1997) The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth's Distinctive Ecorcgions. Draft report. World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Power, M.E., Tilman, D., Estes, J.A., Menge, A., Bond, W.J., Scott Mills, L. et al. (1996) Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience, 46, 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinthal, P. (1993) Evaluating biodiversity and conserving Lake Malawi's cichlid fauna. Conservation Biology, 7, 712–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickart, E.A., Tabaranza, B.R., Heaney, L.R. & Balete, D.S. (1998) A review of the genera Crunomys and Archboldomys (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae), with descriptions of two new species from the Philippines. Fieldiana Zoology n.s., 89, 1–24.Google Scholar
Rylands, A.B., Mittermeier, R.A. & Rodrìguez-Luna, E. (1997) Conservation of Neotropical primates: threatened species and an analysis of primate diversity by country and region. Folia Primatologica, 68, 134–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, M.N.F. (1998) Four new species of spiny rats of the genus Proechimys (Rodentia: Echimyidae) from the western Amazon of Brazil. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 111, 436–471.Google Scholar
Stattersfield, A.J., Crosby, M.J., Long, A.J. & Wege, D.C. (1998) Endemic Bird Areas of the World. Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. BirdLife Conservation Series no. 7, BirdLife International, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Storch, G. (1995) Affinities among living dormouse genera. Hystrix (N.S.), 6, 51–62.Google Scholar
Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. & Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect? – systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation, 55, 235–254.Google Scholar
Williams, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. (1994) Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biological Conservation, 67, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. (eds) (1993) Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Yensen, E. & Hafner, D.J. (1998) North American rodents. In North American Rodents. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan (eds Hafner, D. J., Yensen, E. & Kirkland, G. Jr, ), pp. 1–4, IUCN/SSC Rodent Specialist Group, Gland.Google Scholar
Yensen, E., Quinney, D.L., Johnson, K., Timmerman, K. & Steenhof, K. (1992) Fire, vegetation changes, and population fluctuations of Townsend's ground squirrels. American Midland Naturalist, 128, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar