Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:18:15.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of habitat alteration and disturbance by humans and exotic species on fosa Cryptoprocta ferox occupancy in Madagascar's deciduous forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2019

Samuel D. Merson*
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London, Outer Circle, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK
Luke J. Dollar
Affiliation:
Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Cedric Kai Wei Tan
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanati–Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Tubney, UK
David W. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanati–Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Tubney, UK
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

Anthropogenic habitat alteration and invasive species are threatening carnivores globally. Understanding the impact of these factors is critical for creating localized, effective conservation programmes. Madagascar's Eupleridae have been described as the least studied and most threatened group of carnivores. We investigated the effects of habitat degradation and the presence of people and exotic species on the modelled occupancy of the endemic fosa Cryptoprocta ferox, conducting camera-trap surveys in two western deciduous forests, Ankarafantsika National Park and Andranomena Special Reserve. Our results indicated no clear patterns between habitat degradation and fosa occupancy but a strong negative association between cats Felis sp. and fosas. Cat occupancy was negatively associated with birds and positively associated with contiguous forest and narrow trails. In contrast, dog Canis lupus familiaris occupancy was best predicted by wide trails, degraded forest and exotic civets. Our results suggest fosas are capable of traversing degraded landscapes and, in the short term, are resilient to contiguous forest disturbance. However, high occupancy of cats and dogs in the landscape leads to resource competition through prey exploitation and interference, increasing the risk of transmission of potentially fatal diseases. Management strategies for exotic carnivores should be considered, to reduce the widespread predation of endemic species and the transmission of disease.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2019

Introduction

The fosa Cryptoprocta ferox is Madagascar's largest endemic carnivore. The species plays a critical role in ecosystems across Madagascar as an apex predator of lemurs, small mammals, reptiles and birds (Dollar et al., Reference Dollar, Ganzhorn, Goodman, Gursky and Nekaris2007; Hawkins & Racey, Reference Hawkins and Racey2008). Weighing 6–7 kg (Hawkins, Reference Hawkins1998; Dollar, Reference Dollar2006), male fosas have been estimated to occupy large home ranges of up to 50 km2 (Lührs & Kappeler, Reference Lührs and Kappeler2013) at low densities of 0.18–0.26 per km2 in deciduous forests (Hawkins & Racey, Reference Hawkins and Racey2005) and 0.20 per km2 in rainforests (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Gerber, Farris, Karpanty, Ratelolahy and Kelly2018b). Currently categorized as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List (Hawkins, Reference Hawkins2016), fosas are threatened by bushmeat hunting (Golden, Reference Golden2009; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b; Merson, Reference Merson2018), retaliatory killing in response to poultry predation (Hawkins, Reference Hawkins2016; Merson, Reference Merson2018), exotic species (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012b; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Kelly, Karpanty and Ratelolahy2015c) and habitat loss (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b).

Deforestation has significantly reduced Madagascar's overall forest cover, and much of the remaining forest is severely degraded (Allnutt et al., Reference Allnutt, Asner, Golden and Powell2013; Vieilledent et al., Reference Vieilledent, Grinand, Rakotomalala, Ranaivosoa, Rakotoarijaona, Allnutt and Achard2018). However, there has been little research on the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on Madagascar's endemic species (Irwin et al., Reference Irwin, Wright, Birkinshaw, Fisher, Gardner and Glos2010). In addressing these empirical deficits, the fosa is a useful focal species because its innate biological characteristics (large body size and home range, low population density) make it potentially more susceptible to human-caused extinction (Ripple et al., Reference Ripple, Estes, Beschta, Wilmers, Ritchie and Hebblewhite2014).

Research documenting the fosa's persistence in human-disturbed landscapes is mostly limited to Madagascar's eastern rainforests. Camera-trap studies have reported broad patterns of lower native, and higher exotic carnivore occupancy in more degraded forests (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Karpanty, Ratelolahy and Kelly2014, Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b; Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Goodman, Farris, Karpanty, Andrianjakarivelo and Kelly2017). However, despite these advances in the knowledge of anthropogenic disturbance in eastern Madagascar, no similar research has yet been published from Madagascar's deciduous forests, a globally important, threatened ecoregion (Waeber et al., Reference Waeber, Wilmé, Ramamonjisoa, Garcia, Rakotomalala and Rabemananjara2015).

Deforestation in western Madagascar has reduced much of its deciduous forest cover (Scales, Reference Scales2012), with high annual rates of loss continuing (Zinner et al., Reference Zinner, Wygoda, Razafimanantsoa, Rasoloarison, Andrianandrasana, Ganzhorn and Torkler2014). Many narrow-ranged endemic taxa occupy these forests (Waeber et al., Reference Waeber, Wilmé, Ramamonjisoa, Garcia, Rakotomalala and Rabemananjara2015), and are potentially capable of responding differently to anthropogenic change in rainforests compared to deciduous forests (Gardner, Reference Gardner2009; Irwin et al., Reference Irwin, Wright, Birkinshaw, Fisher, Gardner and Glos2010). With these species now facing greater anthropogenic disturbance, understanding this relationship is more important than ever.

This study investigated the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on fosas living in deciduous forest. Surveys were conducted in two forests, Ankarafantsika National Park and Andranomena Special Reserve, contrasting in degradation, forest cover and human occupation. Our objectives were to examine (1) the effects of human and exotic species presence on fosa occupancy, (2) the effects of various landscape variables (measures of forest degradation) on fosa occupancy, and (3) differences in fosa occupancy between the two forests.

Study area

Ankarafantsika National Park is Madagascar's largest continuous dry deciduous forest (1,350 km2; Fig. 1). The 37.73 km2 study site within the Park includeses four villages and is characterized by old-growth forest (defined as continuous forest that has experienced some human disturbance), savannah, raffia plantations and rice fields. It is used recurrently by local people and frequented by exotic species, including the zebu Bos primigenius indicus, free-ranging dogs Canis lupus familiaris and cats Felis sp., bushpig Potamochoerus larvatus, small Indian civet Viverricula indica, and another endemic carnivore, the western falanouc Eupleres major (Merson et al., Reference Merson, Macdonald and Dollar2018).

Fig. 1 (a) Forest cover (shaded) and location of study sites in north-west and western Madagascar where the camera-trap surveys were conducted during 2014–2015, with location of camera traps in (b) north-west Ankarafantsika National Park and (c) western Andranomena Special Reserve.

Andranomena Special Reserve (64 km2) is located in the central-western region of Menabe. The 35.45 km2 study site within the Reserve encompasses contiguous, mostly old-growth forest, with two villages on its boundary. The area is bisected by a grid system of trails established by the former Forestry Commission (Fig. 1). Despite the cessation of commercial logging, widespread illegal logging was evident throughout the study site. The Reserve is home to another euplerid, the endemic bokiboky Mungotictis decemlineata.

Methods

Eighty pairs of camera traps (Cuddeback Ambush IR 1187, De Pere, USA) were placed along trails in Ankarafantsika National Park for 80 days during April–June 2014), and in Andranomena Special Reserve for 35 days during May–June 2015. Trails were chosen to maximize the detection of fosas and exotic species for occupancy analysis (O'Connell et al., Reference O'Connell, Nichols and Karanth2010). Camera stations were c. 500 m apart, improving the detection of E. major and M. decemlineata, which have smaller home ranges than C. ferox. Stations were set up following the methodology of Gerber et al. (Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a). Pairs of independently operated cameras were placed flanking trails, 20–30 cm above the ground, to improve detection and account for potential camera-trap failure. Camera stations operated for 1–3 months to ensure sufficient data were collected, and to minimize violation of the assumption of population closure for occupancy modelling (MacKenzie, Reference MacKenzie, Nichols, Royle, Pollock, Bailey and Hines2006).

Analysis

We used occupancy modelling to investigate the effects of camera-station level, landscape-level and species-level (i.e. species presence) variables on the probability of fosa presence (MacKenzie & Nichols, Reference MacKenzie and Nichols2004). Photographic data were converted into detection histories (1, detection; 0, non-detection) for the fosa, and for key exotic species (Table 1) used as covariates. All detections within a 30-minute period were considered a single detection (Linkie & Ridout, Reference Linkie and Ridout2011). A complete camera-trap day involved at least one of two cameras operating during the 24 hours. Capture histories for each species were created through the collapsing of individual days into 5-day periods, improving temporal independence and model convergence (Otis et al., Reference Otis, Burnham, White and Anderson1978). Species-level covariates were the encounter rates of exotic animals and humans at each camera-trap station and were calculated by evaluating trap success (number of detections/total days × 100) per species. Two survey covariates were included to account for detection probability: the site surveyed (Site), and the number of days a station was active during each 5-day sampling period (Effort).

Table 1 Forest area and summary statistics of the camera-trap surveys conducted during 2014–2015 in Ankarafantsika National Park and Andranomena Special Reserve, Madagascar (Fig. 1), with the camera-trap station, landscape-level and species-level covariates (i.e. trap success) at each site.

1Forest type, forest classification (old-growth, degraded, savannah); Trail type, game trail, Madagascar National Park trail, disused logging trail, trail actively used by local people; GFC20, mean % global forest cover (forest cover at 20% threshold level at 30 m resolution); VCF, mean vegetation continuous field (% forest cover at 250 m resolution; Drainage, mean distance (m) to nearest drainage point (lowest point of elevation).

2,3,4Indicates the best performing uncorrelated covariates included in the final fosa2, dog3 and cat4 occupancy models.

Camera station-level covariates were included to assess the impact of station geography. Trail width, trail type and forest type were included as they have been reported to be important metrics in fosa occupancy (Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b). Trail width was estimated by averaging the width of the trail at the camera-trap station and at 10 m either side. Forest type was categorized subjectively and visually as either old-growth (intact forest with some disturbance), degraded (low forest cover, with few native plant species) or savannah (anthropogenic grassland). Trail type was confirmed by a local guide and categorized as Madagascar National Park trail, local (actively used by local people), disused-local (formerly used by local people), game (animal trail), logging (actively used by loggers), or disused-logging (formerly used by loggers).

We used QGIS v. 2.12.1 (QGIS Development Team, 2015) and FRAGSTATS v. 4.2 (McGarigal et al., Reference McGarigal, Cushman, Neel and Ene2002) to create 12 landscape-level covariates, to examine the effects of human settlement, landscape degradation, and ecological variables on fosa occupancy (Table 1). A 500-m buffer was created around each camera-trap station and the mean value of the raster cells was calculated for each covariate.

Two metrics were used to measure forest cover: global forest cover (GFC; Hansen et al., Reference Hansen, Potapov, Moore, Hancher, Turubanova and Tyukavina2013) and mean vegetation continuous field (VCF; DiMiceli et al., Reference DiMiceli, Carroll, Sohlberg, Huang, Hansen and Townshend2011). The per cent of GFC (which is at 30 m resolution) that can be classified as forest may be specified. We chose 10, 20, 30 and 50% and compared these within univariate models to find the best predictor of fosa occupancy. VCF provides a forest cover per cent at 250 m map resolution. Maps of GFC for Andranomena Special Reserve were unavailable for thesurvey year, and therefore the most recently available (2014) maps were used. Four measures of fragmentation (Table 1; Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b) were calculated with FRAGSTATS.

Two measures of water proximity were calculated using a waterway raster containing Madagascar's major water sources (Mapcruzin, 2016) and a digital elevation model (Jarvis et al., Reference Jarvis, Reuter, Nelson and Guevara2008), facilitating the mapping of low-elevation areas that may represent drainage points and potential seasonal streams. The covariate mean elevation was created from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission's 90 m raster (Carroll et al., Reference Carroll, Townshend, DiMiceli, Noojipady and Sohlberg2009).

We used the R v. 3.3.3 (R Core Team, 2017) package unmarked v. 0.11–0 (Fiske & Chandler, Reference Fiske and Chandler2011) to run single-species, single-season occupancy modelling of the fosa, cat, and dog. Prior to modelling, a Pearson's correlation test was used to eliminate multicollinearity. We removed correlated continuous predictors (r > 0.6; i.e. the predictor that performed worst in the univariate model) and normalized the remaining covariates. A stepwise approach was taken to reduce the total number of competing covariates to be included in each final occupancy model for fosa, cat and dog. Firstly, the detection probability was modelled, with the most significant combination of detection covariates (Site and Effort) selected. Secondly, potential occupancy covariates were modelled independently with selected detection covariates, with the best-performing uncorrelated covariates retained (Table 1). We used the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and model selection to rank competing models, and reported those with AIC < 2.0. Covariates that attained a summed model weight > 0.50 were considered to be important predictors of occupancy (Barbieri & Berger, Reference Barbieri and Berger2004).

We ran a goodness-of-fit test to examine the model's likelihood of being correct (P > 0.05) and determine how well it fitted the data (measuring overdispersion as ĉ). Species occupancy was predicted across both sites, accounting for the important covariate predictors.

Results

Landscape features and site detections

With a sampling effort of 8,730 nights across both sites, we recorded the presence of three native and three exotic carnivores (Table 1). The survey in Andranomena Special Reserve was shortened as a result of camera-trap theft (35 days vs 80 days in Ankarafantsika National Park). Overall, the landscape of the Park was more degraded (GFC 75.32%) than that of the Reserve (GFC 97.16%). The mean distance from camera stations to the nearest village and to the forest edge was considerably less in the Park than in the Reserve (Table 1).

In total, 311 independent detections of fosas were recorded (226 in the Park, 85 in the Reserve). In the Park, E. major was detected once, and in the Reserve M. decemlineata was detected twice. Small Indian civets were absent from the Reserve; in the Park they were detected almost exclusively in savannah and degraded land. These low detection rates prohibited occupancy modelling for these three species. Trap success was higher for dogs, zebu and humans in the Park, and for cats and birds in the Reserve (Table 1).

Covariate and model validation

Our two survey covariates (Site and Effort) were contained in the best performing detection model (Supplementary Table 1). Consequently, they were included in all subsequent modelling of occupancy with occupancy covariates. Our correlation matrix revealed significant correlations between competing covariates (Supplementary Table 2). Six covariates (Number of patches, Landscape patch index, VCF, Elevation, Mean distances to village and forest) were discarded prior to constructing the multivariate fosa occupancy model. The goodness-of-fit test indicated significant overdispersion, and consequently five sites were removed (42 detections in total).

Occupancy

There were no statistically significant differences in occupancy between the two study sites (P < 0.05). The mean fosa occupancy across both regions was 0.724, being marginally higher in the Reserve (0.757) than in the Park (0.692; χ 2 = 0.003, df = 1, P = 0.959; Fig. 2). Mean cat occupancy was 0.736, and was marginally higher in the Reserve (χ 2 = 2.844, df = 1, P = 0.092). Mean dog occupancy was 0.999, and was considerably higher in the Park (χ 2 = 2.306, df = 1, P = 0.129).

Fig. 2 Estimated site occupancy for the fosa Cryptoprocta ferox, cat Felis sp. and dog Canis lupus familiaris in Ankarafantsika National Park (ANP) and Andranomena Special Reserve (ASR) in Madagascar (Fig. 1). The boxes represent median site occupancy with upper and lower quartiles (25% greater and 25% lesser than the median); whiskers represent maximum/minimum values, black dots naïve occupancy, and white dots outliers.

Cat and dog trap success, GFC20 and total core area were the most important covariates (summed model weight > 0.5; Supplementary Table 3) in explaining fosa occupancy across the landscape (Table 2). Dog trap success had a weak positive relationship with fosa occupancy, whereas cat trap success, GFC20 and total core area had a negative relationship with fosa occupancy (Table 3).

Table 2 Species covariate occupancy models for fosa, cat and dog, with Akaike information criterion corrected for a small sample size (AICc), relative change in Akaike information criterion from top model (ΔAICc), Akaike weight (AICc weight), number of parameters (K), and −2 log likelihood.

1Cat, Dog, Lemur, Bird, Civet and Zebu, species encounter rates (total detections/total sampling days × 100); GFC20, % global forest cover at 20% threshold level (30 m resolution); TCA, total core area in each patch (m2); TW, trail width (m); VCF, vegetation continuous field (% forest cover at 250 m resolution); Forest, forest classification (old-growth, degraded, savannah); NP, total patches of a class type; FD, distance to forest edge (m).

Table 3 Landscape single-season occupancy models for fosa, cat and dog, including all best performing, uncorrelated covariates. Model data were from camera-trap surveys conducted in Ankarafantsika National Park and Andranomena Special Reserve, Madagascar (Fig. 1) during 2014–2015.

1 Trail width, mean trail width (m); Trap success (cat, dog, lemur, bird, civet, zebu, pig), species encounter rates (total detections/total sampling days × 100); GFC20, % global forest cover at 20% threshold level (30 m resolution); Total edge, sum of all edge segments in camera-trap buffer; Total core area, in each patch (m2); Village/Water/Road/Forest distance, mean distance (m) to nearest village/water source/road/forest edge; VCF, vegetation continuous field (% forest cover at 250 m resolution); Drainage, mean distance (m) to nearest drainage point (lowest point of elevation); Landscape patch index (% of landscape in the largest patch); Forest, forest classification (old-growth, degraded, savannah); Number of patches, number of patches of a class type; Trail: game, game trail; Trail: MNP, Madagascar National Park trail; Trail: disused logging, disused logging trail; Trail: local, trail actively used by local people.

Cat occupancy was best explained by bird trap success, trail width and VCF (Table 2). Bird trap success and trail width were negatively correlated with cat occupancy, whereas there was a positive association between occupancy and VCF (Table 3).

Dog occupancy was best explained by civet trap success, forest type, number of patches and trail width (Table 2). Civet trap success and trail width were positively correlated with dog occupancy, whereas old-growth, savannah and total patches negatively affected occupancy (Table 3).

Discussion

Overall our results were unclear regarding the relationship between the fosa, landscape degradation and exotic species, with no clear relationship evident between fosas and degradation, but a clear negative relationship between fosas and cats. Our findings regarding dog and cat occupancy concur with previous studies documenting the negative effect of exotic species on Madagascar's endemic carnivores (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b, Reference Farris, Kelly, Karpanty, Murphy, Ratelolahy, Andrianjakarivelo and Holmes2016; Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Goodman, Farris, Karpanty, Andrianjakarivelo and Kelly2017). The fosa appears to be more resilient to habitat disturbance within contiguous forests than other euplerids but the loss of Madagascar's forest is likely to inhibit their long-term persistence. The high occupancy of free-ranging cats and dogs in the landscape indicates considerable competition with fosas through the consumption of shared prey (Brockman et al., Reference Brockman, Godfrey, Dollar and Ratsirarson2008) and exclusion from habitat. The spread of disease, such as toxoplasmosis (Pomerantz et al., Reference Pomerantz, Rasambainarivo, Dollar, Rahajanirina, Andrianaivoarivelo, Parker and Dubovi2016; Rasambainarivo et al., Reference Rasambainarivo, Farris, Andrianalizah and Parker2017), between exotic species, fosas and their prey is of concern, potentially imperilling the health of the fosa population in the long term.

Effect of exotic species on fosa occupancy

Cats had the strongest negative association with fosa occupancy. It is widely acknowledged that cats have a negative impact on native wildlife through predation, competition, hybridization and disease (Medina et al., Reference Medina, Bonnaud, Vidal, Tershy, Zavaleta and Josh Donlan2011). In Madagascar predation on endemic species by cats has been reported (Sauther, Reference Sauther1989; Goodman et al., Reference Goodman, O'Connor, Langrand, Kappeler and Ganzhorn1993; Brockman et al., Reference Brockman, Godfrey, Dollar and Ratsirarson2008), and in Andranomena Special Reserve cats were photographed with a red-fronted brown lemur Eulemur rufus and speckled hognose snake Leioheterodon geayi (Plate 1). In our study the number of cats recorded was negatively associated with bird presence, a relationship reported previously in Masoala–Makira (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Farris, Karpanty, Kelly, Miles and Ratelolahy2018a); negative associations have also been recorded between cats and the rainforest-dwelling euplerids Galidia elegans and Fossa fossana (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b). Collectively these results suggest that cats are probably having a negative impact on the fosa and other endemic species, at the very least through direct predation and competition for prey.

Plate 1 Wild cats Felis sp. preying on (a) a red-fronted brown lemur Eulemur rufus and (b) a speckled hognose snake Leioheterodon geayi in Andranomena Special Reserve, Madagascar (Fig. 1).

In concordance with previous studies in rainforest, dogs did not have a negative association with fosa occupancy (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b). This is in contrast with the reported impact of dogs on the euplerid Galidictis fasciata (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a) and incongruous with the damaging effects of dogs globally (Hughes & Macdonald, Reference Hughes and Macdonald2013). However, activity pattern analyses have indicated fosas display temporal activity shifts towards greater nocturnality (Farris et al., Reference Farris, Gerber, Karpanty, Murphy, Andrianjakarivelo, Ratelolahy and Kelly2015a; Merson, Reference Merson2018), and/or absence from sites with higher frequency of dog detections (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b). The sociality and size of dog packs (L.J. Dollar, unpubl. data) may be a source of interference competition for fosas, but the predatory impact of dogs on Madagascar's ecosystem is still being investigated.

Disease transmission from cats and dogs is a significant threat to the long-term health of endemic species. Fatal cases of Toxoplasma gondii infection have been recorded in captive fosas (Corpa et al., Reference Corpa, García-Quirós, Casares, Gerique, Carbonell and Gómez-Muñoz2013) and lemurs (Juan-Sallés et al., Reference Juan-Sallés, Mainez, Marco and Malabia Sanchís2011; Siskos et al., Reference Siskos, Lampe, Kaup and Mätz-Rensing2015), highlighting their vulnerability to lethal infections. Field studies of exotic carnivores in Ankarafantsika National Park have identified the occurrence of multiple viruses and parasites, including canine parovirus, feline calicivirus and T. gondii (Pomerantz et al., Reference Pomerantz, Rasambainarivo, Dollar, Rahajanirina, Andrianaivoarivelo, Parker and Dubovi2016), the latter prevalent in > 93% of captured wild fosas. The detrimental impact of disease on Madagascar's wild fosa populations could be significant, reflecting disease-related species population declines elsewhere (Pedersen et al., Reference Pedersen, Jones, Nunn and Altizer2007).

Habitat degradation impact on fosa occupancy

Fosa occupancy was higher in Andranomena Special Reserve, possibly because of greater forest cover, and lower dog and human presence. However, within our models fosa occupancy was not influenced by any habitat degradation parameters, with results similar to those reported for Madagascar's rainforests (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a; Farris et al., Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b). Despite this, surveys have not recorded fosas in areas > 5 km from the nearest contiguous forest (Kotschwar Logan et al., Reference Kotschwar Logan, Gerber, Karpanty, Justin and Rabenahy2015) or in forest fragments > 2.5 km from the nearest contiguous forest (Gerber et al., Reference Gerber, Karpanty and Randrianantenaina2012a). This suggests that despite their resilience to habitat degradation within contiguous forest, fosas are unable to persist far from intact forest. Considering Madagascar's highly fragmented forests (Vieilledent et al., Reference Vieilledent, Grinand, Rakotomalala, Ranaivosoa, Rakotoarijaona, Allnutt and Achard2018), it is likely that most forest areas are of insufficient size to support fosa populations in the long term (Hawkins & Racey, Reference Hawkins and Racey2005).

Cat occupancy was higher in the Reserve, positively associated with higher vegetation cover and weakly associated with narrow trails. This could be attributed to their avoidance of larger carnivores (dogs, fosas) and people. Farris et al. (Reference Farris, Golden, Karpanty, Murphy, Stauffer and Ratelolahy2015b) found similar positive associations with forest cover, possibly confirming their preference for areas of greater prey abundance.

Dogs had the highest occupancy in the Park. They had a positive association with large trails, and civets, and a negative association with old-growth forest, and savannah, possibly explained by dogs accompanying people during forest-related activities. This was apparent in the Park, where the forest surrounding rural villages encompassed a mixture of savannah and degraded forest, with high presence of people and exotic species (e.g. zebu, civet).

Long-term implications

Looking beyond the snapshot view of single-season occupancy models, recent multi-year studies in north-eastern Madagascar recorded occupancy of endemic and exotic carnivores, indicating long-term decline and replacement of endemic species by exotic species (Farris et al., Reference Farris, Kelly, Karpanty, Murphy, Ratelolahy, Andrianjakarivelo and Holmes2016). In Ranomafana National Park a multi-year occupancy study reported the long-term decline of fosas, their strong co-occurrence with dogs being a likely source of competition or disease (Farris et al., Reference Farris, Gerber, Valenta, Rafaliarison, Razafimahaimodison and Larney2017). This supports our speculation that fosa resilience to habitat degradation inside contiguous forests is probably short-term, with a long-term population decline evident (Hawkins, Reference Hawkins2016). This is largely the result of the severe reduction of Madagascar's forests, the killing of fosas for bushmeat and in retaliation for poultry depredation, and the increase in abundance of dogs and cats, increasing competition and disease transmission. Steps to mitigate the impact of exotic species on fosas and the ecosystem as a whole need to be explored. Sterilization programmes for domestic cats and dogs, along with culling of free-ranging cats and dogs should be trialled to evaluate their effectiveness in improving the abundance of native species. If they prove to be both cost-effective and beneficial to the ecosystem, we propose the incorporation of these programmes into an island-wide forest management strategy.

Acknowledgements

We thank World Animal Protection, Megafaun and the Fossa Fund of Duisburg Zoo for funding this research, and the organizations and individuals who facilitated our research: MICET, Fanamby and our field research team, Fenohery, Solonantenaina, Naina, Noelson, Frederick, Domoina, Sierra, and our friend Pierrot Rahajanirina, you will be missed. Our deepest gratitude to the Malagasy communities who accommodated us. We thank the Madagascar Government, and National Parks for authorizing this research (permits 107/14 and 109/15/MEEMF/SG/DGF/DCB.SAPT/SCB).

Author contributions

Study design, research, data analysis, writing: SDM; data analysis and writing: CKWT; study design and writing: DWM, LJD.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This research complies with Oryx’s Code of Conduct for authors.

Footnotes

*

Also at: Department of Environment & Sustainability, Center for the Environment, Catawba College, Salisbury, North Carolina, USA

Supplementary material for this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531800100X

References

Allnutt, T.F., Asner, G.P., Golden, C.D. & Powell, G.V.N. (2013) Mapping recent deforestation and forest disturbance in northeastern Madagascar. Tropical Conservation Science, 6, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, M.M. & Berger, J.O. (2004) Optimal predictive model selection. The Annals of Statistics, 32, 870897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockman, D.K., Godfrey, L.R., Dollar, L.J. & Ratsirarson, J. (2008) Evidence of invasive Felis silvestris predation on Propithecus verreauxi at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 135152.10.1007/s10764-007-9145-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M.L., Townshend, J.R., DiMiceli, C.M., Noojipady, P. & Sohlberg, R.A. (2009) A new global raster water mask at 250 m resolution. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2, 291308.10.1080/17538940902951401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corpa, J.M., García-Quirós, A., Casares, M., Gerique, A.C., Carbonell, M.D., Gómez-Muñoz, M.T. et al. (2013) Encephalomyelitis by Toxoplasma gondii in a captive fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox). Veterinary Parasitology, 193, 281283.10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.11.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMiceli, C.M., Carroll, M.L., Sohlberg, R.A., Huang, C., Hansen, M.C. & Townshend, J.R.G. (2011) Annual Global Automated MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields (MOD44B) at 250 m Spatial Resolution for Data Years Beginning day 65, 2000–2010, Collection 5 Percent Tree Cover. University of Maryland, College Park, USA.Google Scholar
Dollar, L.J. (2006) Morphometrics, diet, and conservation of Cryptoprocta ferox. PhD thesis. Duke University, Durham, USA.Google Scholar
Dollar, L., Ganzhorn, J. & Goodman, S. (2007) Primates and other prey in the seasonally variable diet of Cryptoprocta ferox in the dry deciduous forest of western Madagascar. In Primate Anti-Predator Strategies (eds Gursky, S. & Nekaris, K.A.I.), pp. 6376. Springer, New York, USA.10.1007/978-0-387-34810-0_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Z.J., Karpanty, S.M., Ratelolahy, F. & Kelly, M.J. (2014) Predator–primate distribution, activity, and co-occurrence in relation to habitat and human activity across fragmented and contiguous forests in northeastern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 35, 859880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Z.J., Gerber, B.D., Karpanty, S., Murphy, A., Andrianjakarivelo, V., Ratelolahy, F. & Kelly, M.J. (2015a) When carnivores roam: temporal patterns and overlap among Madagascar's native and exotic carnivores. Journal of Zoology, 296, 4557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Z.J., Golden, C.D., Karpanty, S., Murphy, A., Stauffer, D., Ratelolahy, F. et al. (2015b) Hunting, exotic carnivores, and habitat loss: anthropogenic effects on a native carnivore community, Madagascar. PLOS ONE, 10, e0136456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Z.J., Kelly, M.J., Karpanty, S. & Ratelolahy, F. (2015c) Patterns of spatial co-occurrence among native and exotic carnivores in north-eastern Madagascar. Animal Conservation, 19, 189198.10.1111/acv.12233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Z.J., Kelly, M.J., Karpanty, S., Murphy, A., Ratelolahy, F., Andrianjakarivelo, V. & Holmes, C. (2016) The times they are a changin’: multi-year surveys reveal exotics replace native carnivores at a Madagascar rainforest site. Biological Conservation, 206, 320328.10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Z.J., Gerber, B.D., Valenta, K., Rafaliarison, R., Razafimahaimodison, J.C., Larney, E. et al. (2017) Threats to a rainforest carnivore community: a multi-year assessment of occupancy and co-occurrence in Madagascar. Biological Conservation, 210, 116124.10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, I. & Chandler, R. (2011) unmarked: An R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software, 43, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, C.J. (2009) A review of the impacts of anthropogenic habitat change on terrestrial biodiversity in Madagascar: implications for the design and management of new protected areas. Malagasy Nature, 2, 229.Google Scholar
Gerber, B.D., Karpanty, S.M. & Randrianantenaina, J. (2012a) The impact of forest logging and fragmentation on carnivore species composition, density and occupancy in Madagascar's rainforests. Oryx, 46, 414422.10.1017/S0030605311001116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, B.D., Karpanty, S.M., Randrianantenaina, J. (2012b) Activity patterns of carnivores in the rain forests of Madagascar: implications for species coexistence. Journal of Mammalogy, 93, 667676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, C.D. (2009) Bushmeat hunting and use in the Makira Forest, north-eastern Madagascar: a conservation and livelihoods issue. Oryx, 43, 386–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, S.M., O'Connor, S. & Langrand, O. (1993) A review of predation on lemurs: implications for the evolution of social behavior in small, nocturnal primates. In Lemur Social Systems and their Ecological Basis (eds Kappeler, P.M. & Ganzhorn, J.U.), pp. 5166. Springer, New York, USA.10.1007/978-1-4899-2412-4_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M.C., Potapov, P.V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S.A., Tyukavina, A. et al. (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342, 850853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, C.E. (1998) Behaviour and ecology of the fossa, Cryptoprocta ferox (Carnivora: Viverridae) in a dry deciduous forest, western Madagascar. PhD thesis. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
Hawkins, F. (2016) Cryptoprocta ferox. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T5760A45197189. Http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T5760A45197189.en [accessed 17 November 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, C.E. & Racey, P.A. (2005) Low population density of a tropical forest carnivore, Cryptoprocta ferox: implications for protected area management. Oryx, 39, 3543.10.1017/S0030605305000074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, C.E. & Racey, P.A. (2008) Food habits of an endangered carnivore, Cryptoprocta ferox, in the dry deciduous forests of western Madagascar. Journal of Mammalogy, 89, 6474.10.1644/06-MAMM-A-366.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J. & Macdonald, D.W. (2013) A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157, 341351.10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, M.T., Wright, P.C., Birkinshaw, C., Fisher, B.L., Gardner, C.J., Glos, J. et al. (2010) Patterns of species change in anthropogenically disturbed forests of Madagascar. Biological Conservation, 143, 23512362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H.I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. (2008) Hole-filled SRTM for the Globe, Version 4. Available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database. Http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org [accessed 21 January 2019].Google Scholar
Juan-Sallés, C., Mainez, M., Marco, A. & Malabia Sanchís, A.M. (2011) Localized toxoplasmosis in a ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) causing placentitis, stillbirths, and disseminated fetal infection. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 23, 10411045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotschwar Logan, M., Gerber, B.D., Karpanty, S.M., Justin, S. & Rabenahy, F.N. (2015) Assessing carnivore distribution from local knowledge across a human-dominated landscape in central-southeastern Madagascar. Animal Conservation, 18, 8291.10.1111/acv.12137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linkie, M. & Ridout, M.S. (2011) Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests. Journal of Zoology, 284, 224229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lührs, M.L. & Kappeler, P.M. (2013) Simultaneous GPS tracking reveals male associations in a solitary carnivore. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 17311743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Royle, J.A., Pollock, K.H., Bailey, L.L. & Hines, J.E. (2006) Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence. Academic Press, Burlington, USA.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D.I. & Nichols, J.D. (2004) Occupancy as a surrogate for abundance estimation. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 461467.Google Scholar
Mapcruzin (2016) Madagascar Waterways. Http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-madagascar-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm [accessed 7 August 2016].Google Scholar
McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Neel, M.C. & Ene, E. (2002) FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA. Http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html [accessed 21 January 2019].Google Scholar
Medina, F.M., Bonnaud, E., Vidal, E., Tershy, B.R., Zavaleta, E.S., Josh Donlan, C. et al. (2011) A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates. Global Change Biology, 17, 35033510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merson, S.D. (2018) Bushmeat hunting, retaliatory killing, habitat degradation and exotic species as threats to fosa (Cryptoprocta ferox) conservation. PhD thesis. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Merson, S.D., Macdonald, D.W. & Dollar, L.J. (2018) Novel photographic and morphometric records of the western falanouc Eupleres major in Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar. Small Carnivore Conservation, 56, 6067.Google Scholar
Murphy, A.J., Farris, Z.J., Karpanty, S., Kelly, M.J., Miles, K.A., Ratelolahy, F. et al. (2018a) Using camera traps to examine distribution and occupancy trends of ground-dwelling rainforest birds in north-eastern Madagascar. Bird Conservation International, 28, 567580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, A.J., Goodman, S.M., Farris, Z.J., Karpanty, S.M., Andrianjakarivelo, V. & Kelly, M.J. (2017) Landscape trends in small mammal occupancy in the Makira–Masoala protected areas, northeastern Madagascar. Journal of Mammalogy, 98, 272282.Google Scholar
Murphy, A., Gerber, B., Farris, Z., Karpanty, S., Ratelolahy, F. & Kelly, M. (2018b) Making the most of sparse data to estimate density of a rare and threatened species: a case study with the fosa, a little-studied Malagasy carnivore. Animal Conservation, 21, 496504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D. & Karanth, K.U. (eds) (2010) Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Otis, D.L., Burnham, K.P., White, G.C. & Anderson, D.R. (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62, 3135.Google Scholar
Pedersen, A.B., Jones, K.E., Nunn, C.L. & Altizer, S. (2007) Infectious diseases and extinction risk in wild mammals. Conservation Biology, 21, 12691279.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00776.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomerantz, J., Rasambainarivo, F.T., Dollar, L., Rahajanirina, L.P., Andrianaivoarivelo, R., Parker, P. & Dubovi, E. (2016) Prevalence of antibodies to selected viruses and parasites in introduced and endemic carnivores in western Madagascar. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 52, 544552.10.7589/2015-03-063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
QGIS Development Team (2015) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Http://qgis.osgeo.org [accessed 21 January 2019].Google Scholar
Rasambainarivo, F., Farris, Z.J., Andrianalizah, H. & Parker, P.G. (2017) Interactions between carnivores in Madagascar and the risk of disease transmission. EcoHealth, 14, 691703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2017) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Http://www.R-project.org [accessed February 2017].Google Scholar
Ripple, W.J., Estes, J.A., Beschta, R.L., Wilmers, C.C., Ritchie, E.G., Hebblewhite, M. et al. (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science, 343, 1241484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauther, M.L. (1989) Antipredator behavior in troops of free-ranging Lemur catta at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 10, 595606.10.1007/BF02739366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scales, I.R. (2012) Lost in translation: conflicting views of deforestation, land use and identity in western Madagascar. The Geographical Journal, 178, 6779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siskos, N., Lampe, K., Kaup, F.-J. & Mätz-Rensing, K. (2015) Unique case of disseminated toxoplasmosis and concurrent hepatic capillariasis in a ring-tailed lemur: first case description. Primate Biology, 2, 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieilledent, G., Grinand, C., Rakotomalala, F.A., Ranaivosoa, R., Rakotoarijaona, J.-R., Allnutt, T.F. & Achard, F. (2018) Combining global tree cover loss data with historical national forest cover maps to look at six decades of deforestation and forest fragmentation in Madagascar. Biological Conservation, 222, 189197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waeber, P.O., Wilmé, L., Ramamonjisoa, B., Garcia, C., Rakotomalala, D., Rabemananjara, Z.H. et al. (2015) Dry forests in Madagascar: neglected and under pressure. International Forestry Review, 17, 127148.10.1505/146554815815834822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinner, D., Wygoda, C., Razafimanantsoa, L., Rasoloarison, R., Andrianandrasana, H.T., Ganzhorn, J.U. & Torkler, F. (2014) Analysis of deforestation patterns in the central Menabe, Madagascar, between 1973 and 2010. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 157166.10.1007/s10113-013-0475-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (a) Forest cover (shaded) and location of study sites in north-west and western Madagascar where the camera-trap surveys were conducted during 2014–2015, with location of camera traps in (b) north-west Ankarafantsika National Park and (c) western Andranomena Special Reserve.

Figure 1

Table 1 Forest area and summary statistics of the camera-trap surveys conducted during 2014–2015 in Ankarafantsika National Park and Andranomena Special Reserve, Madagascar (Fig. 1), with the camera-trap station, landscape-level and species-level covariates (i.e. trap success) at each site.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Estimated site occupancy for the fosa Cryptoprocta ferox, cat Felis sp. and dog Canis lupus familiaris in Ankarafantsika National Park (ANP) and Andranomena Special Reserve (ASR) in Madagascar (Fig. 1). The boxes represent median site occupancy with upper and lower quartiles (25% greater and 25% lesser than the median); whiskers represent maximum/minimum values, black dots naïve occupancy, and white dots outliers.

Figure 3

Table 2 Species covariate occupancy models for fosa, cat and dog, with Akaike information criterion corrected for a small sample size (AICc), relative change in Akaike information criterion from top model (ΔAICc), Akaike weight (AICc weight), number of parameters (K), and −2 log likelihood.

Figure 4

Table 3 Landscape single-season occupancy models for fosa, cat and dog, including all best performing, uncorrelated covariates. Model data were from camera-trap surveys conducted in Ankarafantsika National Park and Andranomena Special Reserve, Madagascar (Fig. 1) during 2014–2015.

Figure 5

Plate 1 Wild cats Felis sp. preying on (a) a red-fronted brown lemur Eulemur rufus and (b) a speckled hognose snake Leioheterodon geayi in Andranomena Special Reserve, Madagascar (Fig. 1).

Supplementary material: PDF

Merson et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Merson et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 110.8 KB