Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:49:10.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dramatic decline of wild South China tigers Panthera tigris amoyensis: field survey of priority tiger reserves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2004

Ronald Tilson
Affiliation:
Minnesota Zoo, Apple Valley, Minnesota, 55124, USA, and The Tiger Foundation, Vancouver, Canada
Hu Defu
Affiliation:
Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
Jeff Muntifering
Affiliation:
Minnesota Zoo, Apple Valley, Minnesota, 55124, USA, and The Tiger Foundation, Vancouver, Canada
Philip J. Nyhus
Affiliation:
Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper describes results of a Sino-American field survey seeking evidence of South China tigers Panthera tigris amoyensis in the wild. In 2001 and 2002 field surveys were conducted in eight reserves in five provinces identified by government authorities as habitat most likely to contain tigers. The surveys evaluated and documented evidence for the presence of tigers, tiger prey and habitat disturbance. Approximately 290 km of mountain trails were evaluated. Infrared remote cameras set up in two reserves captured 400 trap days of data. Thirty formal and numerous informal interviews were conducted with villagers to document wildlife knowledge, livestock management practices, and local land and resource use. We found no evidence of wild South China tigers, few prey species, and no livestock depredation by tigers reported in the last 10 years. Forest areas designated as tiger reserves, averaging about 100 km2 in size, are too small to support even a few tigers because commercial tree farms and other habitat conversion is common, and people and their livestock dominate these fragments. While our survey may not have been exhaustive, and there may be a single tiger or a few isolated tigers still remaining at sites we missed, our results strongly indicate that no remaining viable populations of South China tigers occur within its historical range. We conclude that continued field efforts are needed to ascertain whether any wild tigers may yet persist, concurrent with the need to consider options for the eventual recovery and restoration of wild tiger populations from existing captive populations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2004 Fauna & Flora International

Footnotes

This paper contains supplementary material that can only be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org
Supplementary material: PDF

Tilson Supplementary material

Tilson Appendix

Download Tilson Supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 46.9 KB