Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:27:46.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a Rewilding of the Ear

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

André G. Pinto*
Affiliation:
Rua Maria Andrade, 42, 4ºEsq, 1170–220 Lisboa, Portugal

Abstract

In this article I outline the idea of an empirical/experiential reconnection to the natural non-human world through the practice of deep listening. I believe that the aesthetic experience is central to a more ecological positioning of the human being on earth and that aesthetic experience should involve a ‘rewilding of the ear’. To discuss this concept, I build an argument from Edgard Varèse’s music as ‘organised sound’ and approach it from a perceptual point of view. This leads to the discussion of other concepts, such as David Dunn’s ‘grief of incommunicability’ (Dunn 1997) and Jean-François Augoyard and Henry Torgue’s ‘sharawadgi effect’ (Bick 2008). Further to this I discuss parallels between Truax’s continuum (Speech–Music–Soundscape) and Peirce’s semiotic system. Taking points from these theories, we can discuss the possibility of the re-tuning of our ears to the wider sound palette of the world. I consider George Monbiot’s concepts of ‘rewilding’ and ‘rewilding of the human life’ (Monbiot 2014), in order to create a parallel to our relationship with the soundscape.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. L. 2009. The Place Where You Go to Listen: In Search of an Ecology of Music. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 2002. Aesthetic Theory. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bick, A. 2008. Acoustic Sharawadgi. https://silentlistening.wordpress.com/2008/05/30/acoustic-sharawadgi/ (accessed 3 June 2015).Google Scholar
Chung, T. C. 2001. The Music of the Earth. In D. Rothenberg and M. Ulvaeus (eds.) The Book of Music and Nature. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. F. 2005. Ways of Listening – An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 2003. Deleuze on Music, Painting and the Arts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. 1997. Nature, Sound Art and the Sacred. http://davidddunn.com/~david/writings/terrnova.pdf (accessed 3 June 2014).Google Scholar
Feld, S. 1994. From Ethnomusicology to Echo-Muse-Ecology: Reading R. Murray Schafer in the Papua New Guinea Rainforest. The Soundscape Newsletter 8: 46.Google Scholar
Grosz, E. A. 2008. Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Groys, B. 2008. Art Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harvard University. 2012. THE GREAT ANIMAL ORCHESTRA: A Performance & Dialogue in Soundscape and Poetry. www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsEgbo1o70g (accessed 4 June 2015).Google Scholar
Hendy, D. 2013. Noise. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, T. 2001. An Interview with Pierre Schaeffer. In D. Rothenberg and M. Ulvaeus (eds.) The Book of Music and Nature. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
jdavidm. 2007. John Cage about Silence. www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcHnL7aS64Y (accessed 4 June 2015).Google Scholar
Monbiot, G. 2014. Feral: Rewilding the Land, Sea and Human Life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 2001. Sonic Images. In D. Rothenberg and M. Ulvaeus (eds.) The Book of Music and Nature. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 2005. Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. New York: Deep Listening Publications.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 2012. Foreword Anthology of Essays on Deep Listening. Kingston, NY: Deep Listening Publications.Google Scholar
Prévost, E. 2011. The First Concert: An Adaptive Appraisal of Meta Music. Harlow, Essex: Copula.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 2007. Solfejo do Objecto Sonoro (originally published as Solfège de l’Objet Sonore, trans. António Sousa Dias). Paris: INA – GRM.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 1969. The New Soundscape. Scarborough, ON: Berandol Music.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 1977. Our Sonic Environment and the Soundscape: The Tuning of the World. Rochester: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
Schryer, C. 2001. The Sharawadji Effect. In D. Rothenberg and M. Ulvaeus (eds.) The Book of Music and Nature. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Stocker, M. 2013. Hear Where We Are: Sound, Ecology, and Sense of Place. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2001. Acoustic Communication, 2nd edn. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Turino, T. 1999. Signs of Imagination, Identity and Experience: A Peircian Semiotic Theory for Music. Ethnomusicology 43(2): 221255.Google Scholar
Varèse, E. and Wen-chung, C. 1966. The Liberation of Sound. Perspectives of New Music 5(1): 1119.Google Scholar
Westerkamp, H. 2006. Soundwalking as Ecological Practice. www.sfu.ca/~westerka/writings%20page/articles%20pages/soundasecology2.html (accessed 8 August 2015).Google Scholar