Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:32:24.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Live Electronics in Practice: Approaches to training professional performers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2013

Jamie Bullock*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Conservatoire, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B3 3HG, UK
Lamberto Coccioli*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Conservatoire, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B3 3HG, UK
James Dooley*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Conservatoire, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B3 3HG, UK
Tychonas Michailidis*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Conservatoire, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B3 3HG, UK

Abstract

Teaching live electronic music techniques to instrumental performers presents some interesting challenges. Whilst most higher music education institutions provide opportunities for composers to explore computer-based techniques for live audio processing, it is rare for performers to receive any formal training in live electronic music as part of their study. The first experience of live electronics for many performers is during final preparation for a concert. If a performer is to give a convincing musical interpretation ‘with’ and not simply ‘into’ the electronics, significant insight and preparation are required. At Birmingham Conservatoire we explored two distinct methods for teaching live electronics to performers between 2010 and 2012: training workshops aimed at groups of professional performers, and a curriculum pilot project aimed at augmenting undergraduate instrumental lessons. In this paper we present the details of these training methods followed by the qualitative results of specific case studies and a post-training survey. We discuss the survey results in the context of tacit knowledge gained through delivery of these programmes, and finally suggest recommendations and possibilities for future research.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bullock, J., Beattie, D., Turner, J. 2011. Integra Live: A New Graphical User Interface for Live Electronic Music. Proceedings of the 2011 NIME conference. Oslo: NIME, pp. 387392.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S., Smalley, D. 2001. Electro-Acoustic Music. In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan, vol. 8, pp. 5965.Google Scholar
Hughes, D. 2012. Mediocrity to Artistry: Technology and the Singing Voice. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Education 30th World Conference on Education. Thessaloniki, Greece: ISME, pp. 6468.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Tony. 2002. On the Difficulty of Learning to Program. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences. Loughborough: LTSN – CIS, vol. 4, pp. 53–8.Google Scholar
McNutt, E. 2003. Performing Electroacoustic Music: A Wider View of Interactivity. Organised Sound 8(3): 297304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudi, J. and Bullock, J. 2011. The Integra Project. Proceedings of the 2011 Electroacoustic Music Society Conference. New York: EMS. http://www.ems-network.org.Google Scholar
Zbyszynski, M., Wright, M. and Campion, E. 2007. Design and Implementation of CNMAT's Pedagogical Software. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Copenhagen: ICMA, 57–60.Google Scholar