Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:51:44.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Images of Sonic Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2010

Rolf Inge Godøy
Rolf Inge Godøy*
Affiliation:
Department of Musicology, University of Oslo, P.B. 1017 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on innumerable informal accounts and a number of scientific studies, there can be no doubt that people often have quite vivid images of musical sound in their minds, and that this is the case regardless of levels of musical training. Various introspective accounts and more recent neurocognitive research seem to converge in suggesting that imagery for music is closely linked with imagery for music-related actions. In this paper, the consequences of sound–action links for our notions of the sonic image are discussed, with a particular focus on the relationship between sonic objects and action chunks. In conclusion, the exploitation of action imagery is seen as holding great promise in enhancing our means for musical imagery in various creative, research and educational contexts.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 15 , Issue 1: Sonic imagery , April 2010 , pp. 54 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bangert, M., Altenmüller, E. O. 2003. Mapping Perception to Action in Piano Practice: A Longitudinal DC-EEG Study. BMC Neuroscience 4: 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoz, A. 1997. Le sens du mouvement. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1983. Guide des objets sonores. Paris: INA/GRM Buchet/Chastel.Google Scholar
Eitan, Z., Granot, R. Y. 2006. How Music Moves: Musical Parameters and Listeners’ Images of Motion. Music Perception 23(3): 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eitan, Z., Granot, R. Y. 2008. Growing Oranges on Mozart’s Apple Tree: ‘Inner Form’ and Aesthetic Judgment. Music Perception 25(5): 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, D., Helsen, W., Chua, R. 2001. A Century Later: Woodworth’s (1899) Two-Component Model of Goal-Directed Aiming. Psychological Bulletin 127(3): 342–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., Turvey, M. T. 2006. The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13(3): 361–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallese, V., Metzinger, T. 2003. Motor Ontology: The Representational Reality Of Goals, Actions And Selves. Philosophical Psychology 16(3): 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjerdingen, R. O., Perrott, D. 2008. Scanning the Dial: The Rapid Recognition of Music Genres. Journal of New Music Research 37(2): 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godøy, R. I. 1997. Formalization and Epistemology. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Godøy, R. I. 2003. Motor-mimetic Music Cognition. Leonardo 36(4): 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godøy, R. I. 2006. Gestural-Sonorous Objects: Embodied Extensions of Schaeffer’s Conceptual Apparatus. Organised Sound 11(2): 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godøy, R. I. 2008. Reflections on Chunking in Music. In A. Schneider (ed.) Systematic and Comparative Musicology: Concepts, Methods, Findings. Hamburger Jahrbuch für Musikwissenschaft, Band 24. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main, 117–132.Google Scholar
Godøy, R. I. 2010a. Gestural Affordances of Musical Sound. In R. I. Godøy and M. Leman (eds.) Musical Gestures. Sound, Movement, and Meaning. New York: Routledge, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godøy, R. I. 2010b. Thinking Now-Points in Music-Related Movement. In R. Bader, C. Neuhaus and U. Morgenstern (eds.) Concepts, Experiments, and Fieldwork. Studies in Systematic Musicology and Ethnomusicology. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main, 241–258.Google Scholar
Godøy, R. I., Jørgensen, H. (eds.) 2001. Musical Imagery. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Godøy, R. I., Leman, M. (eds.) 2010. Musical Gestures. Sound, Movement, and Meaning. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godøy, R. I., Haga, E., Jensenius, A. 2006a. Playing ‘Air Instruments’: Mimicry of Sound-producing Gestures by Novices and Experts. In S. Gibet, N. Courty and J.-F. Kamp (eds.) Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation: 6th International Gesture Workshop, LNAI 3881. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 256–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godøy, R. I., Haga, E., Jensenius, A. R. 2006b. Exploring Music-Related Gestures by Sound-Tracing: A Preliminary Study. In K. Ng (ed.) Proceedings of the COST287-ConGAS 2nd International Symposium on Gesture Interfaces for Multimedia Systems. Leeds University: Leeds, 27–33.Google Scholar
Godøy, R. I., Jensenius, A. R., Nymoen, K. 2009. Chunking by Coarticulation in Music-related Gestures. Paper presented at The 8th International Gesture Workshop, Bielefeld, 25–27 February 2009.Google Scholar
Haga, E. 2008. Correspondences between Music and Body Movement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., Bunz, H. 1985. A Theoretical Model of Phase Transitions in Human Hand Movements. Biological Cybernetics 51(5): 347–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslinger, B., Erhard, P., Altenmüller, E., Schroeder, U., Boecker, H., Ceballos-Baumann, A. O. 2005. Transmodal Sensorimotor Networks during Action Observation in Professional Pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 282–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haueisen, J., Knösche, T. R. 2001. Involuntary Motor Activity in Pianists Evoked by Music Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13(6): 786–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, A., Wanderley, M., Paradis, M. 2003. The Importance of Parameter Mapping in Electronic Instrument Design. Journal of New Music Research 32(4): 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1991. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, 1893–1917. English translation by John Barnett Brough. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S., Fuchs, A., Lancaster, R., Holroyd, T., Cheyne, D., Weinberg, H. 1998. Dynamic Cortical Activity in the Human Brain Reveals Motor Equivalence. Nature 392(23): 814–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, R. A., Carterette, E. C. 1993. Identification and blend of timbres as a basis for orchestration. Contemporary Music Review 9(1&2): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G. 2002. Hearing sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons. Science 297: 846–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, S. 1994. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashley, K. S. 1951. The Problem of Serial Order in Behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (ed.) Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. New York: Wiley, 112–131.Google Scholar
Leman, M. 2008. Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Michon, J. 1978. The Making of the Present: A Tutorial Review. In J. Requin (ed.) Attention and Performance VII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 89–111.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. 1956. The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review 63: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, B. C. J. (ed.) 1995. Hearing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Porcello, T. 2004. Speaking of Sound: Language and the Professionalization of Sound-Recording Engineers. Social Studies of Science 34(5): 733–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisberg, D. (ed.) 1992. Auditory Imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D., Cohen, R. G., Jax, S. A., Weiss, D. J., van der Wel, R. 2007. The Problem of Serial Order in Behavior: Lashley’s Legacy. Human Movement Science 26(4): 525–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffer, P. 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. (with sound examples by Reibel, G., and Ferreyra, B.) 1998. Solfège de l’objet sonore. Paris: INA/GRM.Google Scholar
Schleidt, M., Kien, J. 1997. Segmentation in Behavior and What it Can Tell us about Brain Function. Human Nature 8(1): 77–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, A., Godøy, R. I. 2001. Perspectives and Challenges of Musical Imagery. In R. I. Godøy and H. Jørgensen (eds.) Musical Imagery. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 5–26.Google Scholar
Snyder, B. 2000. Music and Memory: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stern, W. 2004. The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wanderley, M., Battier, M. (eds.) 2000. Trends in Gestural Control of Music. Paris: Ircam.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., Knoblich, G. 2005. The Case for Motor Involvement in Perceiving Conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin 131(3): 460–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xenakis, I. 1992. Formalized Music. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press.Google Scholar
Zatorre, R. J., Halpern, A. R. 2005. Mental Concerts: Musical Imagery and Auditory Cortex. Neuron 47: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed