Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:38:48.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of an Inclusive Model to Construct Teacher’s Professional Knowledge: Pedagogic content knowledge for sound-based music as a new subject area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2019

Motje Wolf  and
Sarah Younie
Motje Wolf*
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Portland Building 1.23, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
Sarah Younie*
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Portland Building 1.23, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
*
Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article outlines a systematic process for developing the different knowledge domains required for teaching sound-based (electroacoustic) music as a new subject area. As a new area within the discipline of music, teachers are novices to the field. This requires epistemological deconstruction of what knowledge teachers need in this new field. Then the analysis outlines how to develop teachers’ new knowledge, which can be constructed as subject content knowledge (SCK), pedagogic content knowledge (PCK) and technology pedagogic content knowledge (TPACK). This epistemological analysis informed our creation of teaching materials that develop these different knowledge domains and take account of the complex interplay between them. This process was demonstrated through the ElectroAcoustic Resource Site Projects, which first built subject content knowledge and then created teacher’s packs to build pedagogic content knowledge, and a bespoke CPD programme, which embedded their inter-relationships and built technology pedagogic content knowledge. Most importantly, creating the teacher’s packs employed a user-centred design approach, putting teachers and pupils in the centre of the development process, thereby giving them voice. Voice is an integral part of empowerment in our model, which disrupts the hegemonic grip of the academic curriculum dominated by the traditional music canon. This article adds to the knowledge-base regarding how to develop the different domains required for teaching a new subject. We argue that sound-based music is accessible to all teachers and learners, thereby increasing inclusivity. This in turn can radically disrupt ways of teaching music in schools and the model created provides the necessary scaffolding for a paradigm shift in music teaching on an international level.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Bringing New Music to New Audiences , December 2019 , pp. 274 - 288
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adorno, T. W. 1970. Aesthetic Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1991. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Albert, Daniel J. 2006. Socioeconomic Status and Instrumental Music: What Does the Research Say about the Relationship and Its Implications? UPDATE: Applications of Research in Music Education 25(1): 39–45.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. and Krathwohl, D. (eds.) 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolton, J. 2008. Technologically Mediated Composition Learning: Josh’s Story. British Journal of Music Education 25(1): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1976. The School as a Conservative Force: Scholastic and Cultural Inequalities. In Dale, R., Esland, G. and MacDonald, M. (eds.) Schooling and Capitalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brown, S. 2008. Complexity, Ambiguity and Uncertainty: A User-Centred Approach to Maximising Access and Use of Event-Based Cultural Heritage Data. In Ioannides, M., Addison, A., Georgopoulos, A. and Kalisperis, L. (eds.) VSMM 2008: Digital Heritage Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia Short Papers. Budapest: Archaelingua, 102–8.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. 2006. In Search of Pedagogy. Volume 1: The Selected Works of Jerome S. Bruner. London: Routledge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, P. 2007. Reframing Creativity and teChnology: Promoting Pedagogic Change in Music Education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education 1(1): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capel, S., Leask, M. and Younie, S. (eds.) 2016. Learning to Teach in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience, 7th edn. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. and Yung, B. 2018. Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching a New Topic: More Than Teaching Experience and Subject Matter Knowledge. Res Sci Educ 48: 233–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DfE (Department for Education). 2011. The Importance of Music: A National Plan for Music Education. www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-importance-of-music-a-national-plan-for-music-education (accessed 20 March 2019).Google Scholar
DfE. 2013. National Curriculum in England: Complete Framework for Key Stages 1 to 4 – for Teaching from September 2016. www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4 (accessed 3 March 2019).Google Scholar
Gilroy, P. 1987. There ain’t no black in the Union Jack, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. 1983. Theory and Resistance in Education. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. (under review) Playing the White Man’s tune: inclusion in elite classical music education. Article.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and Rationalisation of Society, trans. T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press/Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and System, trans. T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press/Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A. 1989. Curriculum and Assessment Reform. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holland, D. 2016. Developing Heightened Listening: A Creative Tool for Introducing Primary School Children to Sound-Based Music. PhD e-thesis, DeMontfort University, Leicester. www.dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/13304.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. 1938. Traditional and Critical Theory. In Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Jaramillo, M. C. J. 2008. The Music Educator’s Professional Knowledge. Music Education Research 10(3): 347–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S., Procter, R. and Younie, S. 2015. Participatory Knowledge Mobilization: An Emerging Model for Translational Research in Education. JET Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy (Special Issue: Translational Research and Knowledge Mobilisation in Teacher Education) 41(5): 555–74.Google Scholar
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Bouck, E. C., DeSchryver, M., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S. and Wolf, L. G. 2011. Deep-Play: Developing Tpack for 21st Century Teachers. International Journal for Learning Technology 6(2): 146–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krug, S. 2000. Don’t Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Berkley: Newriders.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 2007. Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, L. 2012. Making Music with Sounds. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, L., Hall, R. and Uwins, M. 2013. Widening Participation in Electroacoustic Music: The EARS 2 Pedagogical Initiatives. Organised Sound 18(2): 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, L., Younie, S., Hill, A. and Wolf, M. 2014. The EARS 2 Pedagogical Project: An eLearning Environment to Introduce Learners to Sound-Based Music. In Himonides, E. and King, A. (eds.) Researching Music, Education, Technology: Critical Insights. Proceedings of the Sempre MET 2014. London: International Music Education Research Centre (iMerc) Press, 129–35.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1937. The Affirmative Character of Culture. In Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Masuhara, H. 2011. What Do Teachers Really Want from Coursebooks? In Tomlinson, B. (ed.) Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236–66.Google Scholar
McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. 2010. You and Your Action Research Project, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mishra, P. and Koehler, M. J. 2006. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. T. 1996. A Taxonomy of Computer Music. Contemporary Music Review 13(2): 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulantaz, N. 1975. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Savage, J. 2005. Working Towards a Theory of Music Technologies in the Classroom: How Pupils Engage with and Organise Sounds with New Technologies. British Journal of Music Education 22(2): 167–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shivers-McNair, A. Phillips, J., Campbell, A., Mai, H. H., Yan, A., Macy, J. F. et al. 2018. User-Centered Design in and beyond the Classroom: Toward an Accountable Practice. Computers and Composition 49: 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. S. 1986. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2): 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate. 2011. The Tate Movie Project. www.tate.org.uk/about-us/projects/tate-movie-project (accessed 16 October 19).Google Scholar
Therapontos, N. 2013. Evolving Music Education in the Digital Age: Sound-Based Music in Public Schools of Cyprus. PhD e-thesis, De Montfort University. http://hdl.handle.net/2086/11609.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (ed.) 2011. Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, R. and Codina, N. 2014. Habitus and Flow in Primary School Musical Practice: Relations between Family Musical Cultural Capital, Optimal Experience and Music Participation. Music Education Research, 16(4): 505–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, C. and Ball, S. J. 2007. ‘Making Up’ the Middle-Class Child: Families, Activities and Class Dispositions. Sociology 41(6): 1061–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walby, S. 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Willis, P. 1977. Learning to Labour. London: Saxon House.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. 2008. EARS II – Time for a New Approach to Electroacoustic Music. In Marin, M., Knoche, M. and Parncutt, R. (eds.) First International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology (SysMus08): Proceedings. Graz: Department of Musicology, University of Graz, 104–11.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. 2013a. The Appreciation of Electroacoustic Music – An Empirical Study with Inexperienced Listeners. PhD e-thesis, De Montford University, Leicester. www.dora.dmu.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/2086/8680.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. 2013b. The Appreciation of Electroacoustic Music – The Prototype of the Pedagogical ElectroAcoustic Resource Site. Organised Sound 18(2): 124–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. and Younie, S. 2018. Overcoming Barriers: Towards a Framework for Continuing Professional Development to Foster Teaching Sound-Based Music. Journal of Music, Technology and Education 11(1): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Younie, S. 2007. Integrating ICT into Teachers Professional Practice: The Cultural Dynamics of Change. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester.Google Scholar