Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:40:15.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Just Don’t Call it Trip Hop: Reconciling the Bristol sound style with the trip hop genre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2016

Jeff Wragg*
Affiliation:
PhD candidate, University of Waikato, New Zealand

Abstract

Trip hop music emerged in the early 1990s, however, as a label the term ‘trip hop’ has always been problematic. Portishead, Massive Attack and Tricky, the artists frequently credited with creating trip hop, have unanimously rejected the label, claiming their music has nothing to do with trip hop. Despite the artists’ objections, music industrialists, fans and academics continually label their music trip hop or its alternate term ‘Bristol sound’, though specifics are never given as to what, if anything, distinguishes the two terms. This article seeks to mediate the discussion between opposing viewpoints by describing the Bristol sound as a style that relates to the trip hop genre. Following the introduction, the second section discusses the controversy surrounding the term ‘trip hop’ and suggests possible reasons behind the artists’ rejection of the label. The third section addresses the terms ‘genre’ and ‘style’ and outlines their similar points of reference while also highlighting their different areas of inquiry. The final section analyses several trip hop songs and identifies common elements that relate to the trip hop genre, before identifying explicit differences that distinguish the Bristol sound style. The analysis of style focuses on the spectral quality of the works and draws from Smalley’s (1997) theory of spectromorphology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Biddinger, M. and Yochim, E. 2008. ‘It Kind of Gives You That Vintage Feel’: Vinyl Records and the Trope of Death. Media, Culture & Society 30(2): 183195.Google Scholar
Brøvig-Hanssen, R. 2013. Music in Bits and Bits of Music: Signatures of Digital Mediation in Popular Music Recordings. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Brøvig-Hanssen, R. and Danielsen, A. 2013. The Naturalised and the Surreal: Changes in the Perception of Popular Music Sound. Organised Sound 18(1): 7180.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbri, F. 1981. A Theory of Musical Genres: Two Applications. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Popular Music Studies. Amsterdam, June 1980.Google Scholar
Fabbri, F. 2007. Browsing Music Spaces: Categories and the Musical Mind. In A. F. Moore (ed.) Critical Essays in Popular Musicology. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1996. Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D. and Melville, C. 2001. Urban Breakbeat Culture: Repercussions of Hip Hop in the United Kingdom. In T. Mitchell (ed.) Global Noise: Rap and Hip Hop Outside the USA. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. 1996. Straight Outta Bristol: Massive Attack, Portishead, Tricky and the Roots of Trip-hop. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Lacasse, S. 2000. Intertextuality and Hypertextuality in Recorded Popular Music. In M. Talbot (ed.) The Musical Work: Reality or Invention? Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Leydon, R. 2010. Recombinant Style Topics: The Past and Future of Sampling. In J. Covach and M. Spicer (eds.) Sounding Out Pop: Analytical Essays in Popular Music. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, K. 2001. Genres, Subgenres, Sub-subgenres and More: Musical and Social Differentiation Within Electronic/Dance Music Communities. Journal of Popular Music Studies 13: 5975.Google Scholar
Metzer, D. 2003. Quotation and Cultural Meaning in Twentieth-century Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mistry, A. 2011. Why Portishead Still Matters. Toronto Standard. www.torontostandard.com/culture/why-portishead-still-matters/ (accessed 24 July 2015).Google Scholar
Moore, A. F. 2012. Song Means: Analysing and Interpreting Recorded Popular Song. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Moorefield, V. 2005. The Producer as Composer: Shaping the Sounds of Popular Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Negus, K. 1999. Music Genres and Corporate Cultures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. 2009. Superstar DJs Here We Go. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Prendergast, M. 2000. The Ambient Century: From Mahler to Trance – the Evolution of Sound in the Electronic Age. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. 1999. Generation Ecstasy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schild, M. 2011. Portishead’s Geoff Barrow. The A.V Club, 26 October. www.avclub.com/article/portisheads-geoff-barrow-63127 (accessed 8 August 2015).Google Scholar
Simpson, D. 2008. He Takes it Very Seriously and Thinks the World’s Going to End at Any Minute. In a Musical Sense He’s Very Dark. The Guardian, 11 April. www.theguardian.com/music/2008/apr/11/popandrock.portishead1 (accessed 24 July 2015).Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Sound-shapes. Organised Sound 2(2): 107126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, D. 2007. Space-form and the Acousmatic Image. Organised Sound 12(1): 3558.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. 2014. Remixology: Tracing the Dub Diaspora. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Théberge, P. 1997. Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Walser, R. 1993. Running With the Devil: Power, Gender & Madness in Heavy Metal Music. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, P. 2007. Exploring the Networked Worlds of Popular Music. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodlief, M. 1999. (Never) Mind the Gap. Ray Gun, April. www.moon palace.de/tricky/raygun99.html (accessed 28 July 2015).Google Scholar
Wragg, J. 2015. Illuminating the Intertext: Categorising Signifiers in the Music of Portishead. Paper presented at the Intertextuality in Music Since 1900 Conference at the University of Lisbon, Portugal. https://waikato.academia.edu/JeffWragg.Google Scholar

Discography

DJ Krush. 1995. Big City Lover. On Big City Lover. Japan: Triad, COCA-12547-CD.Google Scholar
DJ Krush. 1995. What’s Behind Darkness. On Meiso. London: Mo’ Wax, MW039CD-CD.Google Scholar
DJ Shadow. 1996. What Does Your Soul Look Like (Part 1 – Blue Sky Revisit). On Endtroducing. London: Mo’ Wax, MW059CD-CD.Google Scholar
DJ Shadow. 1998. In/Flux. On Pre-Emptive Strike. London: Mo’ Wax, 314 540 867-1-LP.Google Scholar
Lamb. 1996. Górecki. On Lamb. Los Angeles: Fontana, 532 968-2-CD.Google Scholar
Lamb. 2001. Gabriel. On What Sound. USA: Mercury, 586 538-2-CD.Google Scholar
Massive Attack. 1999. Angel. On Mezzanine. London: EMI, 7243 8 45599 2 2-CD.Google Scholar
Massive Attack. 1999. Risingson. On Mezzanine. London: EMI, 7243 8 45599 2 2-CD.Google Scholar
Massive Attack. 1999. Teardrop. On Mezzanine. London: EMI, 7243 8 45599 2 2-CD.Google Scholar
Morcheeba. 1996. Never an Easy Way. On Who Can You Trust? London: China Records, 0630-14373-2.Google Scholar
Morcheeba 1996. Trigger Hippie. On Who Can You Trust? London: China Records, 0630-14373-2.Google Scholar
Portishead. 1994. Dummy. London: Go! Beat, 828 553-2-CD.Google Scholar
Portishead. 1994. Biscuit. On Dummy. London: Go! Beat, 828 553-2-CD.Google Scholar
Portishead. 1994. Sour Times. On Dummy. London: Go! Beat, 828 553-2-CD.Google Scholar
Portishead. 1994. Wandering Star. On Dummy. London: Go! Beat, 828 553-2-CD.Google Scholar
Portishead. 1997. Elysium. On Portishead. London: Go! Beat, 539 435-2-CD.Google Scholar
Portishead. 1997. Half Day Closing. On Portishead. London: Go! Beat, 539 435-2-CD.Google Scholar
Sneaker Pimps. 1997. 6 Underground. On Becoming X. London: Virgin, 7243 8 42587 2 6-CD.Google Scholar
Sneaker Pimps. 1997. Becoming X. On Becoming X. London: Virgin, 7243 8 42587 2 6-CD.Google Scholar
Sneaker Pimps. 1997. Low Place Like Home. On Becoming X. London: Virgin, 7243 8 42587 2 6-CD.Google Scholar
Tricky. 1995. Black Steel. On Maxinquaye. London: Island, 314-524 089-2-CD.Google Scholar
Tricky. 1995. Hell is Around the Corner. On Maxinquaye. London: Island, 314-524 089-2-CD.Google Scholar
Tricky. 1995. Suffocated Love. On Maxinquaye. London: Island, 314-524 089-2-CD.Google Scholar
U.N.K.L.E. 1998. Lonely Soul. On Psyence Fiction. London: Mo’ Wax, 314-540-970-2-CD.Google Scholar
U.N.K.L.E. Celestial Annihilation. On Psyence Fiction. London: Mo’ Wax, 314-540-970-2-CD.Google Scholar
U.N.K.L.E. Unreal. On Psyence Fiction. London: Mo’ Wax, 314-540-970-2-CD.Google Scholar