Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T09:27:50.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Audiovisual Materialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2020

Mo H. Zareei*
Affiliation:
New Zealand School of Music–Te Kōkī, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Abstract

This article looks at the emergence of physical material in a growing number of contemporary sound-based art practices. From academic symposia to music festivals and media art exhibitions, the material presence of physical artefacts is notable in a variety of sound-based disciplines and scenarios. Considering the significance of the visual aspect of these works, this article proposes a reassessment of what audiovisual entails. I argue that our understanding of audiovisual status needs to be expanded beyond the scope of screen-based applications and move into the physical realm of objects and material. Further to this, I outline how the dominant discussions around materiality in sound-based art do not speak sufficiently to the physical materiality manifested in a growing wave within the field. Using an example of my own creative work, I will then suggest audiovisual materialism as an alternative lens through which such practices can be better examined, understood and built upon.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basanta, A. 2017. Shades of Synchresis: A Proposed Framework for the Classification of Audiovisual Relations in Sound-and-Light Media Installations. eContact! 19 (2). https://econtact.ca/19_2/basanta_synchresis.html (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar
Bernier, N. 2012. frequencies (a). www.nicolasbernier.com/page/works.htm (accessed 6 July 2020).Google Scholar
Bernier, N. 2017. Editorial. eContact! 19 (2). https://econtact.ca/19_2/editorial.html (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar
Chion, M. (ed.) 2019. Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobussen, M. 2016. Introduction. In Cobussen, M., Meelberg, V. and Truax, B. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Sounding Art. New York: Routledge, 1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, J. 2010. Electroacoustic Music with Moving Images: The Art of Media Pairing. Organised Sound 15 (1): 2634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. 2011. Beyond Representation and Signification: Toward a Sonic Materialism. Journal of Visual Culture 10 (2): 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. 2017. A Brief History of Sound Art. https://youtu.be/hh_5_CAySXY (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar
Döbereiner, D. 2014. How to Think Sound in Itself? Towards a Materialist Dialectic of Sound. Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Network Conference. Berlin: EMS.Google Scholar
ElectroAcoustic Resources Site (EARS). n.d. Audio-Visual Theory. http://ears.huma-num.fr/14f02a46-48c3-462b-a4ce-4cb1eaa9f388.html (accessed 6 July 2020).Google Scholar
Flø, A. 2018. Materiality in Sound Art. Organised Sound 23 (3): 225–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keylin, V. 2015. Corporeality of Music and Sound Sculpture. Organised Sound 20 (2): 182–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, L. 2016. But Is It (Also) Music. In Cobussen, M., Meelberg, V. and Truax, B. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Sounding Art. New York: Routledge, 1726.Google Scholar
Maes, L. and Leman, M. 2016. Defining Sound Art. In Cobussen, M., Meelberg, V. and Truax, B. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Sounding Art. New York: Routledge, 2739.Google Scholar
Pigott, J. 2017. Across Fields: Sound, Art and Technology from an Electromechanical Perspective. Organised Sound 22 (2): 276–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrature. n.d. Noise Signal Silence. https://quadrature.co/work/noise-signal-silence (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar
Raimondo, A. 2014. Mediterraneo. http://annaraimondo.com/010_mediterraneo (accessed 6 July 2020).Google Scholar
Richardson, J., Gorbman, C. and Vernallis, C. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of New Audiovisual Aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, E. 2013. Translating Transformations: Object-Based Sound Installations. Leonardo Music Journal 23: 65–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, A. (n.d.) Ventriloqua. www.iamanagram.com/intrasonic.php (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar
Triana, A. F. 2018. Music On a Bound String and Resonating Tubes. www.albatriana.com/music-on-a-string-and-two-resonators (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar
Tsunoda, T. 2004. Scenery of Decalcomania. Album with Liner notes. Australia: Nature strip. NS3003.Google Scholar
Voegelin, S. 2019. Sonic Materialism: Hearing the Arche-Sonic. In Grimshaw-Aagaard, M., Walther-Hansen, M. and Knakkergaard, M. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Sound and Imagination, Volume 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 559–78.Google Scholar
Zareei, M. H. 2020. Material Music . Video Excerpt, 2:01. https://vimeo.com/375826829 Google Scholar
Zareei, M. H., Kapur, A. and Carnegie, D. A. 2014. Rasper: A Mechatronic Noise-intoner. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. London: NIME, 473–8.Google Scholar
Zareei, M. H., Kapur, A. and Carnegie, D. A. 2015. Rasping Music: Remodeling Early Minimalist Music through Mechatronic Sound-Sculpture. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Denton, TX: ICMC, 384–7.Google Scholar
Zareei, M. H., McKinnon, D., Dale, A. C. and Kapur, A. 2016. Sound-Based Brutalism: An Emergent Aesthetic. Organised Sound 21 (1): 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimoun. (n.d.) Curriculum Vitae. https://www.zimoun.net/cv (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar

Zareei Supplementary Materials

Zareei Supplementary Materials

Download Zareei Supplementary Materials(Video)
Video 18.8 MB