Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T21:37:39.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protein intake adequacy among Nigerian infants, children, adolescents and women and protein quality of commonly consumed foods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2020

Judith de Vries-ten Have*
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 9101, 6700 HBWageningen, The Netherlands
Adedotun Owolabi
Affiliation:
FrieslandCampina WAMCO, Lagos, Nigeria
Jan Steijns
Affiliation:
FrieslandCampina, 3818 LEAmersfoort, The Netherlands
Urszula Kudla
Affiliation:
FrieslandCampina, 3818 LEAmersfoort, The Netherlands
Alida Melse-Boonstra
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 9101, 6700 HBWageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Judith de Vries-ten Have, email [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Protein is important for growth, maintenance and protection of the body. Both adequacy of protein quantity and protein quality in the diet are important to guarantee obtaining all the essential amino acids. Protein–energy malnutrition is widely present in developing countries such as Nigeria and might result in stunting and wasting. Needs for protein differ depending on age and physiological status and are higher during growth, pregnancy and lactation. The present review assessed protein quantity and quality in diets of Nigerian infants, children, adolescents, and pregnant and lactating women. Literature reviews and calculations were performed to assess adequacy of Nigerian protein intake and to examine the Nigerian diet. The digestible indispensable amino acid score was used to calculate protein quality of nine Nigerian staple foods and of a mixture of foods. The Nigerian population had mostly adequate protein intake when compared with the most recent protein recommendations by the FAO (2013) and WHO/FAO/UNU (2007). An important exception was the protein intake of adolescent girls and pregnant and lactating women. Most of the assessed Nigerian plant-based staple foods were of low protein quality and predominantly lacked the amino acid lysine. The addition of animal-source foods can bridge the protein quality gap created by predominance of plant-based foods in the Nigerian diet. The methodology of this review can be applied to other low- and middle-income countries where diets are often plant-based and lack variety, which might influence protein intake adequacy.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Authors 2020

Introduction

Proteins, made up of amino acids, are essential elements in a diet. They are used for growth (i.e. building tissues and fluids) and replacement of lost amino acids and thus maintenance of approximately 25 000 proteins coded by the human genome(Reference King, Burgess and Quinn1,2) . Furthermore, they have regulatory and catalytic functions, protect against infections and can serve as a source of energy(Reference King, Burgess and Quinn1,2) . Nine essential amino acids cannot be synthesised by the body and should, therefore, be obtained from the diet. The essential amino acids are: histidine (His), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), phenylalanine (Phe), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Tryp) and valine (Val). Conditionally essential amino acids cysteine (Cys) and tyrosine (Tyr) are often combined respectively with Met as sulfur amino acids (SAA) and Phe as aromatic amino acids (AAA) for the purpose of calculating dietary requirements.

Adequate protein intake is especially important for infants, children and adolescents since these life stages are characterised by rapid increases in height, weight, development and function maturation, which require higher protein intake(2). Furthermore, pre-pregnancy underweight has been shown to be associated with low birth weight(2,3) . Pregnant and lactating women also have increased protein intake demands for net tissue deposit or milk formation(2). The period from conception until the age of 2 years is especially important for physical, mental and cognitive growth, development and health of the infant(3). However, in the case of developing countries including Nigeria, this period is often characterised by protein–energy malnutrition (PEM), which interferes with optimal growth and development(3).

PEM, a form of undernutrition, indicates a lack of supply to the body or underutilisation of protein and energy(Reference Akerele, Ibrahim and Adewuyi4,Reference Adebayo and Balogun5) . In 2012, PEM was the tenth leading cause of death in the Nigerian population, accounting for 2·5 % of total deaths(6). PEM can also result in wasting, i.e. acute malnutrition, and stunting, i.e. chronic malnutrition, affecting, respectively, 7 % (and 2 % severely wasted) and 37 % (and 19 % severely stunted) of children in Nigeria under the age of 5 years(3). Although wasting has decreased in the recent years (from 18 % in 2013 to 7 % in 2018)(7,8) , there has been no improvement in stunting (in 2013 stunting was 37 %)(7). Additional protein intake might be beneficial for catch-up growth in children who are stunted and for rapid weight gain in children who are wasted(2).

PEM may be further exacerbated by the fact that many children in Nigeria carry the additional burden of different infections. In Nigeria, acute respiratory infections, diarrhoea, sepsis, HIV and AIDS are among the most prevalent causes of total deaths in children under the age of 5 years, with, respectively, 15, 10, 5 and 3 % of deaths(6). For the total population, lower respiratory diseases and HIV/AIDS are the top two leading causes of death accounting for, respectively, 13·9 and 10·4 % of deaths(6). Individuals who suffer from infections, such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, acute diarrhoea, acute respiratory infections and sepsis, activate new metabolic pathways that utilise amino acids, and might, therefore, benefit from higher protein intake to replace specific amino acids(2,Reference Reeds and Jahoor9) .

In Nigeria, low-cost foods rich in good-quality protein are scant(Reference Rand, Pellett and Young10), which makes it difficult to meet protein and amino acid requirements. Studies have been conducted on examining the protein and amino acid composition of certain staple foods and Nigerian diets(Reference Adegboye, Smith and Anang11Reference Stephenson, Amthor and Mallowa13), protein and specific amino acid requirements in individuals(2,Reference Adebayo and Balogun5,Reference Reeds and Jahoor9,Reference Elango, Ball and Pencharz14,Reference Elango, Ball and Pencharz15) , as well as dietary protein intake among children(Reference Agbon, Okeke and Omotayo16), adolescents(Reference Ogunkunle and Oludele17) and women(Reference Ojofeitimi, Ogunjuyigbe and Sanusi18). However, no clear overview of both the adequacy of dietary intake of protein, in terms of quantity, in Nigerian infants, children, adolescents and (pregnant and lactating) women, and the role of the Nigerian diet and specific staple foods in achieving this adequacy exists. Hence, the present review aims at comparing the Nigerian dietary intake of protein with the protein recommendations for these groups. Furthermore, we examined the Nigerian diets regarding the most commonly eaten food groups and staple foods. We also made an effort to examine protein quality, using the most recent protein quality measure, digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS)(19), of some major staple foods that constitute the Nigerian diet. Protein quality was also determined for a mixture of foods since foods are often eaten together with other foods and might complement each other in terms of protein quality(19).

Overall, with this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview within the limitations of existing data of protein quality and quantity in the diets of Nigerian infants, children, adolescents, and pregnant and lactating women.

Methodology

The present narrative review has been conducted while applying the methodological rigour of systematic reviews as much as possible. The exact procedures for every step of the writing are described below.

Literature search

A literature search was conducted as described below:

  1. (1) The following database search engines were used: Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and the online library of the Wageningen University and Research. The following search query was used to select relevant articles about nutrition and diet in Nigerian infants, children, adolescents and women: “(nutrition* OR diet*) AND (intake) AND (Nigeria) AND (children OR women OR infants)”. Only articles published after the year 2000 were included to reflect the recent situation. This search yielded 329 articles. All abstracts were reviewed, and relevant complete articles were retrieved.

  2. (2) Additional key words and queries such as ‘amino acids’, ‘protein’, ‘requirements’, ‘recommendations’, ‘infants’, ‘children’, ‘women’, ‘adolescents’, ‘Nigeria’, ‘diet’, ‘consumption’, ‘commonly consumed’ and ‘staple foods’, ‘protein quantity’ and ‘protein quality’ were used to categorise articles according to the different research questions, i.e. protein intake adequacy, sources of protein in Nigerian diets and protein quality.

Protein intake adequacy

Studies assessing protein intake in terms of quantity were reviewed based on the study area and population group. The adequacy of this protein intake was calculated using the mean protein intake and the protein requirement, both estimated average requirement (EAR) and recommended daily allowance (RDA) of the participants. The EAR reported by the FAO(19) and the RDA reported by WHO/FAO/UNU(2) were used. The EAR is the amount of a nutrient needed to meet the needs of 50 % of the population, whereas the RDA meets the needs of almost everyone (97–98 %). These and the mean weight of the participants as reported in the studies were used to calculate the recommended daily protein intake (g/d) per population group. When no mean weight was reported in the article, a reference weight was used. The study of Walpole et al. conducted in 2012(Reference Walpole, Prieto-Merino and Edwards20) estimated an average body mass of 60·7 kg for African adults, both male and female, which was used in the present review as a reference weight when adult body weight was not reported in the study. The level of satisfaction (LOS), which is a measure of protein intake adequacy, as reported in 2014 by Akerele et al. (Reference Akerele, Ibrahim and Adewuyi4), was calculated by dividing the mean protein intake by the calculated recommended daily protein intake for the participants (both EAR and RDA). A LOS above 100 % EAR/RDA means that the protein intake can be considered adequate. The protein intake adequacy of pregnant individuals was calculated in two ways: using an EAR/RDA based on the additional weight (kg) gained during pregnancy or using an EAR/RDA based on normal-weight individuals with an addition of extra protein requirements for pregnancy to the EAR/RDA.

Nigerian diet and its contribution to protein intake adequacy

Major consumed foods and meals across different food groups were examined: cereals, nuts and seeds, legumes, fruits, vegetables, dairy products, meat, poultry, eggs and fish, snacks, roots and tubers, and fats and oils among different age groups. About forty articles were used in compiling an overview of Nigerian consumption patterns mostly based on 24 h recalls and food frequency questionnaires (FFQs).

Protein quality of major staple foods

To assess the dietary protein quality of foods, we used the DIAAS. This measure is based on true ileal digestibility values of individual amino acids rather than the overall (faecal) digestibility of protein which was used in the older method of assessing protein quality: protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS). Therefore, the DIAAS approach better reflects the number of amino acids absorbed(19). The FAO reported that the digestibility factors should preferably be determined in human subjects, but when this is not possible it can be determined in growing pigs or rats(Reference Fuller21).

The FAO(19) reported protein and amino acid intake recommendations for many age groups, but in the end gave the suggestion to use three different age ranges for amino acid scoring patterns to be used in the calculation of protein quality (DIAAS): infants (birth to 6 months), children (6 months to 3 years of age) and older children, adolescents and adults (> 3 years). This age stratification was also used in the present review (Table 1). Nine foods, mostly staples, were chosen from different food groups that were frequently eaten and had a relatively large contribution to (daily) energy or protein intake: cassava, rice, maize, wheat, yam, fish (tilapia), groundnuts, cowpeas and sorghum.

Table 1. Scoring patterns for calculating the digestible indispensable amino acid score in mg/g protein requirement

SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine).

* Based on gross amino acid content in human milk from Table 4 in the FAO report(19).

Based on 0·5-year values from Table 3 in the FAO report.

Based on 3- to 10-year values from Table 3 in the FAO report.

The following equation was used for calculating the DIAAS of these foods:

$${\rm{DIAAS}}\left( \% \right) = \left( {{{({\rm{mg}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{dietary}}\,{\rm{essential}}\,{\rm{amino}}\,{\rm{acid}}\,{\rm{in}}\,{\rm{1g}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{the}}\,{\rm{dietary}}\,{\rm{protein}} \times {\rm{digestibility}}\,{\rm{coefficient}}\,{\rm{amino}}\,{\rm{acid}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{the}}\,{\rm{food}})} \over {{\rm{mg}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{the}}\,{\rm{same}}\,{\rm{dietary}}\,{\rm{essential}}\,{\rm{amino}}\,{\rm{acid}}\,{\rm{in}}\,{\rm{1g}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{the}}\,{\rm{reference}}\,{\rm{protein}}}}} \right) \times 100$$

The digestibility is given as a percentage and must be divided by 100 to obtain the digestibility coefficient (for example, digestibility is 88 %, the coefficient is 88/100 = 0·88). The reference protein is based on the amino acid scoring patterns as proposed by the FAO(19) (Table 1). The limiting amino acid is the amino acid with the lowest score and this is used to reflect the DIAAS of the entire food. A DIAAS ≥ 75 can be considered as a good source of protein whereas a score ≥ 100 can be considered as an excellent source of protein. The DIAAS of a mixture of foods (rice, beans and fish) was determined to examine the effects of combining multiple foods from different food groups on protein quality. Those foods were selected based on the following: availability of the DIAAS values, the fact that they reflect typical Nigerian meal compositions and aim to optimise the protein quality. The method that was used is adapted from FAO(19) and is based on portion sizes of different foods, protein content, amino acid content, true ileal digestibility factors, and the three scoring patterns. Portion sizes (single servings) for rice and cowpeas were adapted from Sanusi & Olurin(Reference Sanusi and Olurin22) and the portion size of tilapia was set at 50 g. The amino acid content in those food portions was calculated as (amino acid content of food (mg/g protein) × true ileal digestibility factors of amino acids in the same food) × (protein content in portion per food). These were compared with references set by the FAO for different age groups to determine the DIAAS(19). (The exact calculations for this mixture are explained in the footnotes of Table 11.)

Results and discussion

Protein intake adequacy

The studies conducted in Nigeria on protein intake cover only a small part of the Nigerian population. Most data available were obtained from the richer southern parts of Nigeria (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Protein-rich foods are usually expensive and not all households have the purchasing power to acquire them(Reference Akerele, Ibrahim and Adewuyi4). Therefore, it can be speculated that protein deficiency is more prevalent in northern Nigeria since there are fewer financial resources available to buy protein-rich foods. Altogether twenty articles were included for examining protein intake adequacy. A total of four studies (19 %) focused on school children (aged 2–12 years), seven articles (43 %) on adolescents (aged 10–19 years), three studies (14 %) concentrated on women including pregnant and lactating women, while six articles (29 %) addressed complete households.

Table 2. Adequacy of protein intake in different states in Nigeria

EAR, estimated average requirement; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; RDA, recommended daily allowance; 24hR, 24 h recall.

* Mean weight expressed in kg, weight used as reported in an article if available, if not a reference weight was used. Average reference weights were calculated when a study covered multiple age groups. When only household data were available, a mean weight of 27·0 kg was calculated from all the reference weights for men and (non-pregnant) women for all ages.

EAR = sum of protein needed for maintenance and growth(19) = ‘the intake that meets the estimated nutrient needs of half the individuals in a group’. RDA (safe intake level) = average protein requirement plus twice the standard deviation, meeting the needs of 97–98 % of the population(2).

Level of satisfaction (%) calculated as protein in g/d consumed by study population divided by the calculated EAR/RDA in g/d × 100.

§ Adapted from FAO(19).

Adapted from WHO/FAO/UNU(2).

Adapted from Walpole et al. (Reference Walpole, Prieto-Merino and Edwards20).

Fig. 1. Map of Nigeria showing the individual states where protein intake was assessed, with the circle indicating a study area studied in one study rather than one state. Blank map adapted from D-Maps(93).

It is important to realise the limitations of the present review due to the quality of the reported data. The protein intake values as reported in our review were mean protein intake values. These values are valid to determine average protein intake adequacy; however, they do not take a distribution of intake into account. Furthermore, studies conducted on Nigerian pregnant and lactating individuals were scarce. Due to lack of data (we found only one study; Table 2) on the protein intake among diseased (for example, HIV/AIDS, respiratory diseases, etc.) target populations, we did not analyse this further. Some studies did report a percentage of stunted/wasted children, but most gave no separate protein intake value for this group. Other studies did not provide information on whether the study population included pregnant, lactating or diseased individuals. Also, many studies did not report the actual weights of the participants, making it difficult to calculate a precise EAR/RDA based on their actual body weight.

Based on the reviewed literature, protein intake of the Nigerian population of non-pregnant and non-lactating women and children seems to be mostly adequate (LOS > 100 %). However, notable exceptions were also reported in the study on overall households’ intakes in Edo and Kogi, where protein intake was reported to be inadequate for all family members, with females’ intakes being the lowest(Reference Onabolu, Bokanga and Tylleskär23). Based on our calculations, protein intake of female adolescents seems to be mostly inadequate (LOS < 100 %). The exceptions of satisfactory intake were reported by Ogechi et al. (Reference Ogechi, Akhakhia and Ugwunna24) and Anyika et al. (Reference Anyika, Uwaegbute and Olojede25), and for adolescents above 13 years by Akinyemi & Ibraheem(Reference Akinyemi and Ibraheem26). Pregnant and lactating women were another group of concern with inadequate protein intake. This could be due to cultural beliefs that exist in certain parts of Nigeria that extra protein cannot be consumed during pregnancy(27) and myths about some forbidden protein-rich foods during pregnancy (for example, eggs, beans, snails and grasscutter meat)(Reference Ekwochi, Osuorah and Ndu28). Especially, the protein intake of pregnant adolescents was low (LOSEAR < 70 %(Reference Oguntona and Akinyele29)); these females were not even able to meet the requirements for healthy non-pregnant and non-lactating women (LOSEAR < 84·0 %; and LOSRDA < 69·8 %). The adult lactating women could only just meet the EAR (LOSEAR = 104 %), but not the RDA (LOSRDA = 86·1 %) for healthy non-pregnant and non-lactating women. This is of concern because inadequate protein intake during pregnancy has both short- and long-term consequences for both the infant and mother. Epidemiological studies in human subjects have shown that protein deficiency during pregnancy gives rise to low birth weight, intra-uterine growth restriction and that these offspring are at greater risk for development of the metabolic syndrome in adult life(Reference Oke, Hardy and Oke30). Nutritional intervention during pregnancy is necessary to ensure that mothers consume appropriate amounts of dietary protein such that there are no negative effects on fetal growth and development(Reference Oke, Hardy and Oke30). Adequate nutrition is also important during the lactation period, as the nutritional content of breast milk was shown to be dependent on maternal diet, for example, fatty acid content, water-soluble vitamins, etc. There are also some reports indicating that the protein quality of the mother’s diet is reflected in the amino acid composition of the breast milk(Reference Wurtman and Fernstrom31,Reference Lindblad and Rahimtoola32) . Especially lysine(Reference Wurtman and Fernstrom31,Reference Lindblad and Rahimtoola32) , methionine(Reference Lindblad and Rahimtoola32) and tryptophan(Reference Wurtman and Fernstrom31) were substantially reduced in women with poor protein intake from the diet (for example, by consumption of mostly cereal grains and legumes).

Interestingly, sufficient protein intakes (LOS > 200) were also reported among children classified as protein deficient based on their anthropomorphic measures(Reference Stephenson, Amthor and Mallowa13). When studies provided their own level of adequacy and reported percentages of individuals with inadequate intakes, a more detailed picture emerged. For example, in the only study with children (2–5 years old) in which such distinction was made, 13 % of the participants were reported to have inadequate protein intake(Reference Stephenson, Amthor and Mallowa13). Within studies focused on women, inadequate intakes were reported for 18 % of women of childbearing age (15–49 years) in south-east Nigeria(Reference Onyeji and Sanusi33), 14·4 % of women aged 20–59 years in Osun State(Reference Adebukola, Ugwunna and Ekerette34), and 22·2 % of adolescent females in Osun(Reference Ogunkunle and Oludele17).

Nigerian diet and its contribution to protein intake adequacy

Previous literature concluded that dietary diversity was low in six states in Nigeria and should be increased(Reference Sanusi35). The search into the Nigerian consumption pattern (Table 3; fruits, vegetables, oils and fats, and snacks not shown) shows that all examined food groups in the Nigerian diet were consumed frequently by at least 25 % of the population, with ‘fats and oils’, ‘cereals’ and ‘snacks’ being consumed the most (> 65·0 %). Snack consumption was most often reported in studies assessing adolescents and could be an explanation for the low protein intake of adolescent girls since snacks are often fat- and carbohydrate-rich, but protein-poor. Wheat and rice were the most frequent consumed cereals. Cassava and yam were the most eaten roots and tubers; beans and groundnuts the most frequently consumed legumes. Beef, chicken and fish were frequently eaten animal foods, while dairy products were less frequently consumed.

Table 3. Commonly consumed foods and meals from different food groups and their contribution to meeting the protein requirements

The percentage of the Nigerian population that frequently consumed roots and tubers is 49·5 %. Cereals and grains were on average consumed daily by 81·3 % of the population. Several studies showed a contribution of cereals to the protein intake of approximately 20–40 %(Reference Akerele36Reference Orewa and Iyangbe38). Legumes were eaten by 45·5 % of the population on average.

Meat, poultry and fish intakes varied widely depending on the study and geographical location, but on average the consumption percentage was 48·5 % for meat and poultry and 49·1 % for fish and shellfish. According to a study conducted in the south-east of Nigeria, animal-source products contributed only 3 % to the total daily energy intake(Reference Stephenson, Amthor and Mallowa13). Dairy products were found to account for barely 0·9 % of protein intake(Reference Akerele36). In general, dairy products were only consumed by 38·4 % of the population, with milk being consumed by only 31·9 % (Table 3).

Protein quality of staple foods

Even though most Nigerian population groups seem to have adequate protein intakes in terms of quantity, it does not guarantee high-enough protein quality. The drastic effects of a poor protein quality cassava-based diet were demonstrated in a study among children displaying signs of protein malnutrition despite their overall protein intakes being very high with LOS > 200(Reference Ojo and Deane39). However, since almost complete protein intake was based on cassava, which has very low protein quality, with leucine being the first limiting amino acid (DIAAS 11–18), it did not cover the children’s nutritional needs, resulting in malnutrition. Overall, the nine major staple foods eaten by Nigerians appear not to deliver protein of good quality (Tables 49). For the foods from the cereal group (rice, wheat, maize and sorghum), lysine was the first limiting amino acid for all age groups, resulting in DIAAS being inadequate (< 75). Wheat and rice were shown to be of good protein quality for children and adults when looking at the second limiting amino acids (DIAAS > 75), but not for infants. The digestibility factor we used for calculating DIAAS of yam was the overall crude protein digestibility for cassava since no factor for yam could be found in the literature. Protein quality of yam depended on the way of its processing. Processed yam compared with the two unprocessed species had lower protein quality in terms of limiting amino acids (DIAAS < 75). The unprocessed (and thus uneatable) yam was shown to be of (marginally) better protein quality for the first SAA and second (lysine) limiting amino acids (DIAAS > 75 for population > 3 years of age). For both groundnuts and cowpeas, the first limiting amino acid was also lysine (DIAAS 27–38), the second SAA (groundnut DIAAS 40–58; cowpea DIAAS 33–49). The DIAAS of rice, maize, wheat and sorghum were, respectively, 42–69, 37–53, 30–43 and 18–26. All sources of cereals/grains did not have good-quality proteins based on their amino acid score and digestibility, and the most deficient amino acid appears to be lysine, followed by SAA. The only source of good-quality protein, which is commonly consumed, was fish. Tilapia, which is also frequently eaten in Nigeria, was the only fish for which information was available to calculate DIAAS: DIAAS > 94 for children 6 months–3 years of age, and excellent DIAAS > 100 for individuals above 3 years.

Table 4. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of cassava and rice*

AA, amino acid; SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine).

* Adapted from FAO(19).

True ileal digestibility = ‘the disappearance of a nutrient between the mouth and the end of the small intestine (terminal ileum)’(19).

Reference ratio calculated as (amino acid content × digestibility)/scoring pattern.

§ Limiting AA calculated as the amino acid(s) with the lowest (red) reference ratio score × 100 %. Also done for the second (orange) and third (yellow) amino acids.

Essential amino acids: histidine (His), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), cysteine (Cys), phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Tryp) and valine (Val).

Table 5. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of maize and wheat*

AA, amino acid; SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine).

* Adapted from FAO(19).

True ileal digestibility = ‘the disappearance of a nutrient between the mouth and the end of the small intestine (terminal ileum)’(19).

Reference ratio calculated as (amino acid content × digestibility)/scoring pattern.

§ Limiting amino acid calculated as the amino acid(s) with the lowest (red) reference ratio score × 100 %. Also done for the second (orange) and third (yellow) amino acids.

Essential amino acids: histidine (His), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), cysteine (Cys), phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Tryp) and valine (Val).

Table 6. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of yam*

AA, amino acid; SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine).

* Adapted from FAO(19).

True ileal digestibility = ‘the disappearance of a nutrient between the mouth and the end of the small intestine (terminal ileum)’(19).

Reference ratio calculated as (amino acid content × digestibility)/scoring pattern.

§ Limiting amino acid calculated as the amino acid(s) with the lowest (red) reference ratio score × 100 %. Also done for the second (orange) and third (yellow) amino acids.

Essential amino acids: histidine (His), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), cysteine (Cys), phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Tryp) and valine (Val).

Table 7. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of fish (tilapia) and groundnuts*

AA, amino acid; SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine).

* Adapted from FAO(19).

True ileal digestibility = ‘the disappearance of a nutrient between the mouth and the end of the small intestine (terminal ileum)’(19).

Reference ratio calculated as (amino acid content × digestibility)/scoring pattern.

§ Limiting amino acid calculated as the amino acid(s) with the lowest (red) reference ratio score × 100 %. Also done for the second (orange) and third (yellow) amino acids.

Essential amino acids: histidine (His), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), cysteine (Cys), phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Tryp) and valine (Val).

Table 8. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of cowpeas*

AA, amino acid; SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine).

* Adapted from FAO(19).

True ileal digestibility = ‘the disappearance of a nutrient between the mouth and the end of the small intestine (terminal ileum)’(19).

Reference ratio calculated as (amino acid content × digestibility)/scoring pattern.

§ Limiting amino acid calculated as the amino acid(s) with the lowest (red) reference ratio score × 100 %. Also done for the second (orange) and third (yellow) amino acids.

Essential amino acids: histidine (His), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), cysteine (Cys), phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Tryp) and valine (Val).

Table 9. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of sorghum*

AA, amino acid; SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine).

* Adapted from FAO(19).

True ileal digestibility = ‘the disappearance of a nutrient between the mouth and the end of the small intestine (terminal ileum)’(19).

Reference ratio calculated as (amino acid content × digestibility)/scoring pattern.

§ Limiting amino acid calculated as the amino acid(s) with the lowest (red) reference ratio score × 100 %. Also done for the second (orange) and third (yellow) amino acids.

Essential amino acids: histidine (His), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), cysteine (Cys), phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Tryp) and valine (Val).

Overall, all DIAAS for the scoring pattern for infants were inadequate. However, infants are supposed to be exclusively breastfed, and the protein of human milk meets all the amino acid requirements. Therefore the FAO(40) based the scoring pattern for infants on breast milk and consequently no foods from either plant- or animal-based foods can satisfy infant amino acid requirements like human breast milk. However, given the worrying possibility that maternal amino acid deficiencies may be reflected in the composition of breast milk protein, we believe that impact of maternal diet on the amino acid pattern in breast milk requires further research to assure the optimal nutrition for breastfed infants(Reference Wurtman and Fernstrom31,Reference Lindblad and Rahimtoola32) .

Foods with high protein quality (DIAAS ≥ 100) are important to bridge the nutritional gaps created by consumption of the low-quality plant-based staple foods. Animal protein sources such as dairy products, beef, chicken and eggs were animal-source foods shown to be such excellent protein sources (DIAAS ≥ 100; Table 10)(Reference Ertl, Knaus and Zollitsch41Reference Rutherfurd, Fanning and Miller43). These foods could be of importance in bridging the gap between the lack of lysine from cereals and legumes. Our results showed that about 40 % of the Nigerian population eats beef frequently. Eggs and chicken are eaten frequently by one-quarter of the Nigerian population. Milk was frequently consumed by one-third of the population. It was shown that plant-based foods had an average DIAAS of 61, whereas animal-source foods had an average DIAAS of 114(Reference Ertl, Knaus and Zollitsch41). If these animal-source foods are consumed daily, they could replenish the amino acids that are consumed in inadequate amounts due to the daily consumption of mainly cereals. A relatively high-quality plant-based food is soya beans which was shown to be an excellent source of protein and could, therefore, be a valuable (plant food) addition to the Nigerian diet (Table 10)(Reference Ertl, Knaus and Zollitsch41).

Table 10. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of high-quality protein foods (adapted from Ertl et al. (Reference Ertl, Knaus and Zollitsch41))

SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine).

* Based on the scoring pattern of 6 months–3 years using pig true ileal digestibility factors.

Adapted from Rutherfurd et al. (Reference Rutherfurd, Fanning and Miller43) based on the scoring pattern of 6 months–3 years using rat true ileal digestibility factors.

Adapted from Mathai et al. (Reference Mathai, Liu and Stein42) based on the scoring pattern of 6 months–3 years using pig true ileal digestibility factors.

§ Adapted from Mathai et al. (Reference Mathai, Liu and Stein42) based on a scoring pattern of >3 years of age using pig true ileal digestibility factors.

Dietary diversity and protein quality of a food mixture

As a rule, it applies that eating from multiple food groups, being both plant and animal foods, increases the chance of meeting the nutrient requirements(Reference Adebukola, Ugwunna and Ekerette34,Reference Ogunba44) . Dietary diversity is widely recognised as a key component of high-quality diets, as consuming a variety of foods across and within different food groups helps ensure adequate intake levels of essential nutrients(Reference Ruel, Harris, Cunningham, Preedy, Hunter and Patel45). However, previous literature concluded that dietary diversity was low in all six examined states in Nigeria and should be increased(Reference Sanusi35). Resource-poor settings are generally characterised by consumption of monotonous diets(Reference Ingenbleek, Jazet and Dzossa46).

Consumption from animal-source food groups was found to be significantly related to nutrient adequacy in Nigeria(Reference Onabolu, Bokanga and Tylleskär23). Animal-source foods are still regarded as the best source of good-quality protein, since plant proteins, with the exception of soya, are lacking one or more essential amino acids(Reference Ertl, Knaus and Zollitsch41,Reference McLain, Escobar and Kerksick47) . Plant foods can make a valuable contribution to overall protein intake, with cereals such as rice and wheat providing adequate amounts of all essential amino acids apart from lysine. The addition of small amounts of animal-based proteins such as milk, cheese, eggs and meat to the diet can possibly bridge the lysine gap that legumes (apart from soya beans) and cereals leave behind.

To demonstrate this in the present review we examined an example of a mixture of commonly eaten plant- and animal-based foods: rice, cowpeas and tilapia (Table 11). The combination of rice, beans and fish is frequently eaten in Nigeria. Portion sizes for rice (51·9 g) and beans (cowpeas) (54·9 g) were obtained from a study in southwestern Nigeria(Reference Sanusi and Olurin22). A portion size of 50 g was assumed for tilapia. The same true ileal digestibility factors and amino acid contents of the foods as for the individual food calculations (Tables 4, 7 and 8) were used. The first limiting amino acids were tryptophan and valine. However, the tryptophan content of cowpeas was not determined. Therefore, the DIAAS based on the second limiting amino acids (isoleucine, lysine and tryptophan) was also determined. If we exclude tryptophan, the DIAAS for infants, children and others were, respectively, 51, 76 and 84 %. For young children and individuals older than 3 years the protein quality for this mixture was good (> 75 %). Where rice and cowpeas individually had lysine as the first limiting amino acid for individuals older than 3 years, this mixture of foods is of good protein quality in terms of lysine (reference ratio = 0·90) for this age group and tilapia bridged the lysine gap that rice and cowpeas left behind. It should still be examined whether the addition of such foods is feasible in terms of availability, affordability and sustainability. Importantly, when a similar exercise was performed by Suri et al. in 2014(Reference Suri, Tano-Debrah and Ghosh48), without the addition of an animal protein source, it was shown that both the addition of groundnuts and cowpeas to cereals like maize, millet and sorghum did not yield good protein quality blends (PDCAAS = 42–67 %). The addition of milk (DIAAS > 116) to the diet might be also valuable for increasing linear growth in stunted children(Reference Hoppe, Mølgaard and Michaelsen49) and could be easily achieved by adding milk to pap given to young children.

Table 11. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of a mixture of rice, cowpeas and tilapia (mixed meal) using the method of the FAO(19)

AA, amino acid; SAA, sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine); AAA, aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine and tyrosine); n.d., not determined.

* Portion sizes (single serving) for rice and cowpeas were adapted from Sanusi & Olurin(Reference Sanusi and Olurin22) and the portion size of tilapia was set at 50·0 g.

Protein content of raw foods adapted from Stadlmayr et al. (Reference Stadlmayr, Charrondiere and Enujiugha82).

Calculated as portion (g) × protein (g/100 g)/100.

§ Calculated as (amino acid content of foods (mg/g protein) × true ileal digestibility factors of amino acids in the same food) × (protein content in portion per food). The amino acid contents of rice and fish were adapted from Shaheen et al. (Reference Shaheen, Islam and Munmun71) and for cowpeas from Olaleke et al. (Reference Olaleke, Olorunfemi and Akintayo91). The true ileal digestibility factors were adapted from Gilani et al. (Reference Gilani, Tomé and Moughan85).

Calculated as the sum of each amino acid content per food/total protein content in the mixture (24·7 g).

Calculated as total in mixture mg of each amino acid in total protein/scoring patterns. Scoring patterns for infants (birth–6 months), children aged 6 months to 3 years and other individuals older than 3 years were adapted from FAO(19).

** Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) determined by multiplying the reference ratio of the first (marked red) and second (marked yellow) limiting amino acid by 100 %.

Strengths

Nigeria is one of the major countries in the West African region and has a complex and diverse food culture; therefore the results of the present review on Nigeria may be also applicable to other countries in West Africa(Reference Adegboye, Smith and Anang11). The methodology of this review can be applied to other low- and middle-income countries since the diets are often, just like the Nigerian diet, mostly plant-based (for example, due to costs) and lack variety, which might influence protein intake adequacy. Diet pattern and protein intake as assessed in the present review reflect recent estimates from the year 2000 and onwards. This review considered both the quantity of protein intake and the protein quality of some major staple foods of the Nigerian diet and a mixture of these foods. Moreover, our review used DIAAS, which is the most recent measure for protein quality and can be considered superior to the old measure (PDCAAS). This was, to our knowledge, the first review that calculated DIAAS of foods such as yam and cassava.

Limitations

The lack of information in the literature on amino acid contents of foods and on true ileal digestibility factors for calculating DIAAS was a major limitation for the present review. Many true ileal digestibility factors are determined in animals, such as pigs, and it is still unsure if these results and methods are also applicable to humans(Reference Fuller21). Many studies did not measure the tryptophan content of foods and we could therefore not calculate a score for this essential amino acid. Given the above, DIAAS was calculated only for nine Nigerian foods, which does not reflect the total diet. The measure for protein quality, DIAAS, does not take quantity into account since it calculates protein quality based on the amounts of amino acid (mg) per 1 g of food protein(19). Furthermore, our review did not take anti-nutritional factors, such as trypsin inhibitors (legumes), tannins (legumes and cereals) and phytates (cereals), both present naturally in the food or formed during processing, into account that may possibly interfere with the absorption of nutrients from the diet. The FAO(19) reported that the methods for determining true ileal digestibility factors might not always fully account for anti-nutritional factors.

Recommendations and future research

We calculated protein quality for a mixture of foods, but information on protein quality of more foods should be determined to calculate DIAAS for complete meals (for example, soups, stews with vegetables, etc.), which play an important role in the Nigerian diet. Also, it is advised to determine the protein quality for more mixtures of foods to examine the role of animal-source proteins in bridging the essential amino acid gaps that plant-based foods leave. To do this, more research should be conducted on amino acid contents of such foods and true ileal digestibility factors to broaden the DIAAS calculations. Also, research should examine whether animal-source proteins can increase the dietary diversity score of Nigerian individuals. Related to this, future research should aim at studying the effects of dietary diversity on protein and amino acid adequacy. The distinction between protein quality v. quantity should be made clearer. This might help in determining portion sizes of (mixtures) of foods for meeting the essential amino acid requirements.

Another attention point for future research might be the development of specific products that address the protein and amino acid needs for those individuals that currently do not consume enough protein. For example, for adolescent girls, it may be beneficial to enrich often consumed snacks with good-quality proteins from, for example, soyabean flour(Reference Hyelsinta, Ebere and Kwary50) or dairy products. Also, possibilities of enriching complementary foods for children, like pap, with good-quality proteins such as soya beans, fish or milk could be explored further(Reference Ojofeitimi, Abiose and Ijadunola51,Reference Ijarotimi and Ogunsemore52) . Providing children with a good-quality protein-rich lunch that will account for about one-third of the protein recommendations in the context of a school feeding programme, for example, might help in eradicating PEM(Reference Akarolo-Anthony, Odubore and Yilme53,Reference Awogbenja54) .

Previous Nigerian studies have suggested affordable and available protein-rich foods such as rabbit meat(Reference Kalio, Etela and Ginika55), insects(Reference Ebenebe, Amobi and Udegbala56), wild plant species(Reference Lockett, Calvert and Grivetti57), indigenous leafy vegetables(Reference Omoyeni, Olaofe and Akinyeye12) and goat milk(Reference Belewu and Adewole58). Some studies have already been conducted on determinants (for example, socio-economic factors, education, infections) of protein intake and PEM, and it is advised to extend this knowledge to better understand the context of protein malnutrition(Reference Akerele, Ibrahim and Adewuyi4,Reference Odebode and Odebode59,Reference Ene-Obong, Enugu and Uwaegbute60) . Also, we believe further research into the effects of maternal diets deficient in essential amino acids on the breast milk amino acid composition is warranted. Finally, we suggest applying the methodology of this review to other developing countries to examine if there is a trend in protein intake adequacy across these countries.

Conclusions

Overall, it was shown that Nigerian population groups had adequate protein intake. The troubling exceptions are adolescent girls and pregnant and lactating women. Furthermore, the Nigerian diet consists mainly of cereals and other plant-based foods, with animal-source foods being consumed to a lesser extent. These results might also be expected in other developing countries since animal-source foods are often more expensive. The protein quality of all plant-based foods as assessed in the present review was shown to be poor when looking at the first limiting amino acids. Rice and wheat were shown to be good sources of protein when looking at the second limiting amino acids. The most limiting amino acids were lysine, leucine, valine, SAA and isoleucine. Tilapia was shown to be an excellent source of protein for individuals above 3 years of age. A mixture of foods from different food groups (rice, cowpeas and tilapia) was shown to be of good protein quality (DIAAS > 75). The addition of animal-source foods bridged the protein quality gap that was created by a predominance of plant-based foods in the Nigerian diet. For example, milk, with its excellent protein quality, could be a valuable addition to the Nigerian diet, especially for malnourished children. Future steps include determination of protein quality of more foods and mixtures and developing and promoting good-quality protein-rich products or meals, which are cost-effective.

Acknowledgements

J. d. V-t H. was an intern at the time of writing of this article, and her internship was financially supported by FrieslandCampina.

J. d. V-t H. is the first author; she carried out the literature review, analysed the data and wrote the article. A. O. helped with formulating of the research questions and co-wrote the article. J. S. helped with assessment of protein quality in the diets. U. K. initiated the research, co-formulated research questions, and co-wrote the article. A. M.-B. co-formulated the research questions and provided guidance for data analysis and interpretation.

A. O., J. S. and U. K. are all employees of FrieslandCampina.

References

King, FS, Burgess, A, Quinn, VJ, et al. (2015) Nutrition for Developing Countries, 3rd ed., pp. 1721. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/med/9780199685226.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO/FAO/UNU (2007) Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition; Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 935. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
National Population Commission & ICF International (2014) Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville, MD: National Population Commission and ICF International.Google Scholar
Akerele, D, Ibrahim, MK & Adewuyi, S (2014) Socioeconomic determinants of protein and calorie consumption and potential risk of protein–energy malnutrition among households in south-west Nigeria. Int J Soc Econ 41, 7588.10.1108/IJSE-10-2012-0196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adebayo, FO & Balogun, MA (2018) Current trend in nutritional rehabilitation of pediatric protein energy malnutrition (PEM) in sub-Sahara Africa: a Nigerian case study. Rehabil Sci 3, 17.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2015) Nigeria: WHO Statistical Profile. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
National Population Commission (Nigeria) (2014) 2013 Demographic and Health Survey Key Findings. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR293/FR293.pdf (accessed December 2019).Google Scholar
National Population Commission (NPC) (Nigeria) and ICF (2019) Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018 Key Indicators Report. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, MD: NPC and ICF.Google Scholar
Reeds, P & Jahoor, F (2001) The amino acid requirements of disease. Clin Nutr 20, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, WM, Pellett, PL & Young, VR (2003) Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 109127.10.1093/ajcn/77.1.109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adegboye, OR, Smith, C, Anang, D, et al. (2016) Comparing and contrasting three cultural food customs from Nigeria and analyzing the nutrient content of diets from these cultures with the aim of proffering nutritional intervention. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56, 24832494.10.1080/10408398.2013.862201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omoyeni, OA, Olaofe, O & Akinyeye, RO (2015) Amino acid composition of ten commonly eaten indigenous leafy vegetables of south-west Nigeria. World J Nutr Health 3, 1621.Google Scholar
Stephenson, K, Amthor, R, Mallowa, S, et al. (2010) Consuming cassava as a staple food places children 2–5 years old at risk for inadequate protein intake, an observational study in Kenya and Nigeria. Nutr J 9, 9.10.1186/1475-2891-9-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elango, R, Ball, RO & Pencharz, PB (2008) Individual amino acid requirements in humans: an update. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 11, 3439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elango, R, Ball, RO & Pencharz, P (2009) Amino acid requirements in humans: with a special emphasis on the metabolic availability of amino acids. Amino Acids 37, 1927.10.1007/s00726-009-0234-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agbon, C, Okeke, E & Omotayo, A (2010) Nutrient intake of rural preschool children in southwest Nigeria. Infant Child Adolescent Nutr 2, 336339.10.1177/1941406410383688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogunkunle, MO & Oludele, AS (2013) Food intake and meal pattern of adolescents in school in Ila Orangun, south-west Nigeria. S Afr J Clin Nutr 26, 188193.10.1080/16070658.2013.11734471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojofeitimi, EO, Ogunjuyigbe, PO, Sanusi, RA, et al. (2008) Poor dietary intake of energy and retinol among pregnant women: implications for pregnancy outcome in southwest Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 7, 480484.10.3923/pjn.2008.480.484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2013) Dietary Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition: Report of an FAO Expert Consultation. Food and Nutrition Paper no. 92. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Walpole, SC, Prieto-Merino, D, Edwards, P, et al. (2012) The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass. BMC Public Health 12, 439.10.1186/1471-2458-12-439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, M (2012) Determination of protein and amino acid digestibility in foods including implications of gut microbial amino acid synthesis. Br J Nutr 108, Suppl. 2, S238S246.10.1017/S0007114512002279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanusi, RA & Olurin, A (2012) Portion and serving sizes of commonly consumed foods, in Ibadan, southwestern Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res 15, 149158.Google Scholar
Onabolu, A, Bokanga, M, Tylleskär, T, et al. (2001) High cassava production and low dietary cyanide exposure in mid-west Nigeria. Public Health Nutr 4, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogechi, UP, Akhakhia, OI & Ugwunna, UA (2007) Nutritional status and energy intake of adolescents in Umuahia Urban, Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 6, 641646.10.3923/pjn.2007.641.646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anyika, JU, Uwaegbute, AC, Olojede, AO, et al. (2009) Nutrient intakes of adolescent girls in secondary schools and universities in Abia State of Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 8, 15961602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinyemi, O & Ibraheem, AG (2009) Assessment of the nutritional status of Queens College students of Lagos State, Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 8, 937939.10.3923/pjn.2009.937.939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FrieslandCampina (2018) Quantum Consumer Solutions. Project Opportunity Nigeria: The Protein Story. Internal report, FrieslandCampina, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ekwochi, U, Osuorah, CDI, Ndu, IK, et al. (2016) Food taboos and myths in south-eastern Nigeria: the belief and practice of mothers in the region. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 12, 7.10.1186/s13002-016-0079-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oguntona, CRB & Akinyele, IO (2002) Food and nutrient intakes by pregnant Nigerian adolescents during the third trimester. Nutrition 18, 673679.10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00747-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oke, SL, Hardy, DB, Oke, SL, et al. (2017) Handbook of Famine, Starvation, and Nutrient Deprivation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Wurtman, JJ & Fernstrom, JD (1979) Free amino acid, protein, and fat contents of breast milk from Guatemalau mothers consuming a corn-based diet. Early Hum Dev 3, 6777.10.1016/0378-3782(79)90021-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindblad, BS & Rahimtoola, RJ (1974) A pilot study of the quality of human milk in a lower socio-economic group in Karachi, Pakistan. Acta Paediatr Scand 63, 125128.10.1111/j.1651-2227.1974.tb04360.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onyeji, GN & Sanusi, RA (2018) Diet quality of women of childbearing age in South-east Nigeria. Nutr Food Sci 48, 348364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adebukola, CO, Ugwunna, UM & Ekerette, NN (2017) Dietary diversity and nutrient intake adequacy among women in Iwo Local Government Area, Osun State Nigeria. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 17, 1264112656.Google Scholar
Sanusi, R (2011) Nigeria: assessment of dietary diversity in six states. Afr J Biomed Res 13, 161167.Google Scholar
Akerele, D (2015) Household food expenditure patterns, food nutrient consumption and nutritional vulnerability in Nigeria: implications for policy. Ecol Food Nutr 54, 546571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glew, RH, Conn, CA, Vanderjagt, TA, et al. (2004) Risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diet of urban and rural dwellers in northern Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr 22, 357369.Google Scholar
Orewa, SI & Iyangbe, CO (2009) Determinants of daily food calorie intake among rural and low-income urban households in Nigeria. Middle East J Sci Res 4, 297306.Google Scholar
Ojo, O & Deane, R (2002) Effects of cassava processing methods on antinutritional components and health status of children. J Sci Food Agric 82, 252257.10.1002/jsfa.1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2013) Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/ag/humannutrition/35978-02317b979a686a57aa4593304ffc17f06.pdf (accessed December 2019).Google Scholar
Ertl, P, Knaus, W & Zollitsch, W (2016) An approach to including protein quality when assessing the net contribution of livestock to human food supply. Animal 10, 18831889.10.1017/S1751731116000902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathai, JK, Liu, Y & Stein, HH (2017) Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS). Br J Nutr 117, 490499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherfurd, SM, Fanning, AC, Miller, BJ, et al. (2015) Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats. J Nutr 145, 372379.10.3945/jn.114.195438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogunba, BO (2010) Diet diversity in complementary feeding and nutritional status of children aged 0 to 24 months in Osun State, Nigeria: a comparison of the urban and rural communities. Child Obes Nutr 2, 330335.Google Scholar
Ruel, M, Harris, J & Cunningham, K (2013) Diet quality in developing countries. In Diet Quality: An Evidence-Based Approach, vol. 2, pp. 239261 [Preedy, VR, Hunter, LA and Patel, VB, editors]. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7315-2_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingenbleek, L, Jazet, E, Dzossa, AD, et al. (2017) Methodology design of the regional Sub-Saharan Africa Total Diet Study in Benin, Cameroon, Mali and Nigeria. Food Chem Toxicol 109, 155169.10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLain, TA, Escobar, KA & Kerksick, CM (2015) Protein applications in sports nutrition – Part I: requirements, quality, source, and optimal dose. Strength Cond 37, 6171.10.1519/SSC.0000000000000128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suri, DJ, Tano-Debrah, K & Ghosh, SA (2014) Optimization of the nutrient content and protein quality of cereal–legume blends for use as complementary foods in Ghana. Food Nutr Bull 35, 372381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoppe, C, Mølgaard, C & Michaelsen, KF (2006) Cow’s milk and linear growth in industrialized and developing countries. Annu Rev Nutr 26, 131173.10.1146/annurev.nutr.26.010506.103757CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyelsinta, LK, Ebere, EC, Kwary, MI, et al. (2017) Quality evaluation of DUBLA, a traditional snack produced from wheat and soybean blends. Semin Ser 8, 6064.Google Scholar
Ojofeitimi, EO, Abiose, S, Ijadunola, KT, et al. (2001) Modification and improvement of nutritive quality of cornpap ‘Ogi’ with cowpea and groundnut milk. Nutr Health 15, 4753.10.1177/026010600101500106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ijarotimi, OS & Ogunsemore, MT (2006) Weaning foods and their impact on child-feeding practices among low-income Nigerian mothers. Food Nutr Bull 27, 327334.10.1177/156482650602700407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akarolo-Anthony, SN, Odubore, FO, Yilme, S, et al. (2013) Pattern of dietary carbohydrate intake among urbanized adult Nigerians. Int J Food Sci Nutr 64, 292299.10.3109/09637486.2012.746290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awogbenja, D (2012) Protein and mineral contents of commonly consumed complementary foods in Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Int J Sci Adv Technol 2, 16.Google Scholar
Kalio, GA, Etela, I & Ginika, VE (2008) Rabbit meat as a preferred animal protein source in Ekpeye Kingdom of Rivers State, Nigeria. Livest Res Rural Dev 20, 9.Google Scholar
Ebenebe, CI, Amobi, MI, Udegbala, C, et al. (2017) Survey of edible insect consumption in south-eastern Nigeria. J Insects Food Feed 3, 241252.10.3920/JIFF2017.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockett, CT, Calvert, CC & Grivetti, LE (2000) Energy and micronutrient composition of dietary and medicinal wild plants consumed during drought. Study of rural Fulani, northeastern Nigeria. Int J Food Sci Nutr 51, 195208.Google ScholarPubMed
Belewu, MA & Adewole, AM (2009) Goat milk: a feasible dietary based approach to improve the nutrition of orphan and vulnerable children. Pak J Nutr 8, 17111714.Google Scholar
Odebode, TO & Odebode, SO (2005) Protein energy malnutrition and the nervous system: the impact of socioeconomic condition, weaning practice, infection and food intake, an experience in Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 4, 304309.Google Scholar
Ene-Obong, HN, Enugu, GI & Uwaegbute, AC (2001) Determinants of health and nutritional status of rural Nigerian women. J Health Popul Nutr 19, 320330.Google ScholarPubMed
Glew, RH, Williams, M, Conn, CA, et al. (2001) Cardiovascular disease risk factors and diet of Fulani pastoralists. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 730736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekpo, AJ & Jimmy, EO (2006) Dietary and haematological evaluation of adolescent females in Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 5, 278281.Google Scholar
Opara, DC, Umoh, IB & John, M (2007) Socio-demographic and anthropometric variables of persons living with HIV and AIDS in Uyo, south eastern Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 6, 547557.10.3923/pjn.2007.547.557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinyemi, O (2009) The use of associations between anthropometric and food variables in the assessment of nutritional status of Queens College students of Lagos State, Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 8, 16451648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, A, Onabanjo, OO & Oguntona, CRB (2012) Nutritional assessment of school-age children attending conventional primary and integrated Qur’anic Schools in Kaduna. Res J Med Sci 6, 187192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otemuyiwa, IO & Adewusi, SRA (2012) Food choice and meal consumption pattern among undergraduate students in two universities in southwestern Nigeria. Nutr Health 21, 233245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogechi, UP (2014) A study of the nutritional status and dietary intake of lactating women in Umuahia, Nigeria. Am J Health Res 2, 2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics, Federal Government of Nigeria (2008) Nigeria Living Standard Survey 2003–2004. https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/nada/index.php/catalog/28/download/35 (accessed December 2019).Google Scholar
Akerele, D, Sanusi, RA, Fadare, OA, et al. (2017) Factors influencing nutritional adequacy among rural households in Nigeria: how does dietary diversity stand among influencers? Ecol Food Nutr 56, 187203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development & World Bank (2012) LSMS – Integrated Surveys on Agriculture: General Household Survey Panel 2010/2011. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Shaheen, N, Islam, S, Munmun, S, et al. (2016) Amino acid profiles and digestible indispensable amino acid scores of proteins from the prioritized key foods in Bangladesh. Food Chem 213, 8389.10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.06.057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomma, A & Rana, K (2007) Inter-household and intra-household patterns of fish and meat consumption in fishing communities in two states in Nigeria. Br J Nutr 97, 145152.Google Scholar
Gegios, A, Amthor, R, Maziya-Dixon, B, et al. (2010) Children consuming cassava as a staple food are at risk for inadequate zinc, iron, and vitamin A intake. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 65, 6470.10.1007/s11130-010-0157-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lateef, OJ, Njogu, E, Kiplamai, F, et al. (2016) Breakfast, food consumption pattern and nutritional status of students in public secondary schools in Kwara State, Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 15, 140147.10.3923/pjn.2016.140.147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) (2012) Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for protein. EFSA J 10, 2557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijarotimi, OS & Esho, TR (2009) Comparison of nutritional composition and anti-nutrient status of fermented, germinated and roasted bambara groundnut seeds (Vigna subterranea). Br Food J 111, 376386.10.1108/00070700910951515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olumakaiye, MF (2013) Adolescent girls with low dietary diversity score are predisposed to iron deficiency in southwestern Nigeria. Infant Child Adolescent Nutr 5, 8591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwaru, BI, Onyeka, IN, Ndiokwelu, C, et al. (2015) Maternal and child dietary patterns and their determinants in Nigeria. Matern Child Nutr 11, 283296.10.1111/mcn.12011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nwamarah, JU, Otitoju Olawale, OGTO & Emewulu, CUD (2015) Iodine and nutritional status of primary school children in a Nigerian community Okpuje, in Nsukka LGA, Enugu State, Nigeria. Der Pharm Lett 7, 271280.Google Scholar
Okoro, EO, Ogunbiyi, AO, George, AO, et al. (2016) Association of diet with acne vulgaris among adolescents in Ibadan, southwest Nigeria. Int J Dermatol 55, 982988.10.1111/ijd.13166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udoh, EE & Amodu, OK (2016) Complementary feeding practices among mothers and nutritional status of infants in Akpabuyo Area, Cross River State Nigeria. Springerplus 5, 2073.10.1186/s40064-016-3751-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stadlmayr, B, Charrondiere, R, Enujiugha, V, et al. (2012) West African Food Composition Table. Rome: FAO.Google ScholarPubMed
Gomes, PTC & Nassar, NM (2013) Cassava interspecific hybrids with increased protein content and improved amino acid profiles. Genet Mol Res 12, 12141222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nhu Phuc, BH, Ogle, B & Lindberg, JE (2000) Effect of replacing soybean protein with cassava leaf protein in cassava root meal based diets for growing pigs on digestibility and N retention. Anim Feed Sci Technol 83, 223235.10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00136-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilani, S, Tomé, D, Moughan, P, et al. (2012) Report of a Sub-Committee of the 2011 FAO Consultation on “Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition”: The Assessment of Amino Acid Digestibility in Foods for Humans and Including a Collation of Published Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility Data for Human Foods. FAO Expert Consultation. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Serna-Saldívar, SO & Rooney, LW (1994) Quality protein maize processing and perspectives for industrial utilization. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Quality Protein Maize, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.Google Scholar
Furuya, S & Kaji, Y (1991) Additivity of the apparent and true ileal digestible amino acid supply in barley, maize, wheat or soya-bean meal based diets for growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 32, 321331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouassi, B, Diopoh, J, Leroy, Y, et al. (1988) Total amino acids and fatty acids composition of yam (Dioscorea) tubers and their evolution during storage. J Sci Food Agric 42, 273285.10.1002/jsfa.2740420310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogunlade, I, Olaifa, O, Adeniran, OA, et al. (2011) Effect of domestic processing on the amino acid profile of Dioscorea rotundata (white yam). Afr J Food Sci 5, 3639.Google Scholar
AFZ, Ajinomoto Eurolysine, Aventis Animal Nutrition, et al. (2000) AmiPig: Ileal standardised digestibility of amino acids in feedstuffs for pigs. http://www.feedbase.com/downloads/amipeng.pdf (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Olaleke, AM, Olorunfemi, O & Akintayo, TE (2006) Compositional evaluation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and scarlet runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus) varieties grown in Nigeria. J Food Agric Environ 4, 3943.Google Scholar
Asiedu, M, Lied, E, Nilsen, R, et al. (1993) Effect of processing (sprouting and/or fermentation) on sorghum and maize: II. Vitamins and amino acid composition. Biological utilization of maize protein. Food Chem 48, 201204.10.1016/0308-8146(93)90058-NCrossRefGoogle Scholar
D-Maps (2018) Map Nigeria. Federal Republic of Nigeria. Boundaries, States. https://d-maps.com/carte.php?num_car=4864&lang=en (accessed December 2019).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Scoring patterns for calculating the digestible indispensable amino acid score in mg/g protein requirement

Figure 1

Table 2. Adequacy of protein intake in different states in Nigeria

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Map of Nigeria showing the individual states where protein intake was assessed, with the circle indicating a study area studied in one study rather than one state. Blank map adapted from D-Maps(93).

Figure 3

Table 3. Commonly consumed foods and meals from different food groups and their contribution to meeting the protein requirements

Figure 4

Table 4. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of cassava and rice*

Figure 5

Table 5. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of maize and wheat*

Figure 6

Table 6. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of yam*

Figure 7

Table 7. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of fish (tilapia) and groundnuts*

Figure 8

Table 8. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of cowpeas*

Figure 9

Table 9. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of sorghum*

Figure 10

Table 10. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of high-quality protein foods (adapted from Ertl et al.(41))

Figure 11

Table 11. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of a mixture of rice, cowpeas and tilapia (mixed meal) using the method of the FAO(19)