Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:46:44.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hormones in international meat production: biological, sociological and consumer issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2013

Hugh Galbraith
Hugh Galbraith*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and ForestryUniversity of Aberdeen581 King Street Aberdeen AB24 5UA, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Hugh Galbraith, fax +44 1224 273731, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Beef and its products are an important source of nutrition in many human societies. Methods of production vary and include the use of hormonal compounds (‘hormones’) to increase growth and lean tissue with reduced fat deposition in cattle. The hormonal compounds are naturally occurring in animals or are synthetically produced xenobiotics and have oestrogenic (oestradiol-17β and its esters; zeranol), androgenic (testosterone and esters; trenbolone acetate) or progestogenic (progesterone; melengestrol acetate) activity. The use of hormones as production aids is permitted in North American countries but is no longer allowed in the European Union (EU), which also prohibits the importation of beef and its products derived from hormone-treated cattle. These actions have resulted in a trade dispute between the two trading blocs. The major concern for EU authorities is the possibility of adverse effects on human consumers of residues of hormones and metabolites. Methods used to assess possible adverse effects are typical of those used by international agencies to assess acceptability of chemicals in human food. These include analysis of quantities present in the context of known biological activity and digestive, absorptive, post-absorptive and excretory processes. Particular considerations include the low quantities of hormonal compounds consumed in meat products and their relationships to endogenous production particularly in prepubertal children, enterohepatic inactivation, cellular receptor- and non-receptor-mediated effects and potential for interference with growth, development and physiological function in consumers. There is particular concern about the role of oestradiol-17β as a carcinogen in certain tissues. Now subject to a ‘permanent’ EU ban, current evidence suggests that certain catechol metabolites may induce free-radical damage of DNA in cell and laboratory animal test systems. Classical oestrogen-receptor mediation is considered to stimulate proliferation in cells maintaining receptivity. Mathematical models describing quantitative relationships between consumption of small amounts of oestrogens in meat in addition to greater concentrations from endogenous production, chemical stoichiometry at cellular level and human pathology have not been developed. Such an approach will be necessary to establish ‘molecular materiality’ of the additional hormone intake as a component of relative risk assessment. The other hormones, although generally less well researched, are similarly subject to a range of tests to determine potentially adverse effects. The resulting limited international consensus relates to the application of the ‘precautionary principle’ and non-acceptance by the European Commission of the recommendations of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, which determined that meat from cattle, hormone-treated according to good practice, was safe for human consumers. The present review considers the hormone issue in the context of current international social methodology and regulation, recent advances in knowledge of biological activity of hormones and current status of science-based evaluation of food safety and risk for human consumers.

Keywords

HormonesMeatHuman consumersCancerRisk assessmentOestradiol-17βTestosteroneProgesteroneTrenbolone acetateMelengestrol acetate
Type
Research Article
Information
Nutrition Research Reviews , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , December 2002 , pp. 293 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2002

References

Allen, NE & Key, TJ (2000) The effects of diet on circulating sex hormone levels in men. Nutrition Research Reviews 13, 159–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, JJB, Anthony, M, Messina, M & Garner, SC (1999) Effects of phyto-oestrogens in tissues. Nutrition Research Reviews 12, 75–116.Google Scholar
Andersson, A-M & Skakkebaek, NE (1999) Exposure to exogenous oestrogens in food: possible impact on human development and health. European Journal of Endocrinology 140, 477–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, DT, Horton, R, Longcope, C & Tait, JF (1969) Steroid dynamics under steady state conditions. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 25, 611–664.Google ScholarPubMed
Barnes, S (2001) Oestrogens and their promiscuous receptors: confronting reality. Biochemical Society Transactions 29, 231–236.Google Scholar
Bauer, ERS, Daxenberger, A, Petri, T, Sauerwein, H & Meyer, HHD (2000) Characterisation of the affinity of different anabolics and synthetic hormones to the human androgen receptor, human sex hormone binding globulin and to the bovine progestin receptor. APMIS 108, 838–846.Google Scholar
Bhasin, S, Woodhouse, L & Storer, TW (2001) Proof of effect of testosterone on skeletal muscle. Journal of Endocrinology 170, 27–38.Google Scholar
Brandt, RT (1997) Factors affecting release rates and blood levels of hormones from steroidal implants. In Impact of Implants on Performance and Carcass Value of Beef Cattle, pp.34–69 [ Owens, FN, Gill, DR, Dolezal, G, Morgan, JB and Horn, GW, organisers]. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Breier, BH, Gluckman, PD & Bass, JJ (1988) The somatotrophic axis in young steers: influence of nutritional status and oestradiol-17β on hepatic high-and low-affinity somatotrophic binding sites. Journal of Endocrinology 116, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, HG (2000) Selective oestrogen receptor modulators. Hormone Research 53, Suppl. 3, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2001) Codex Alimentarius: Codex Standards for Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. http://www.codexalimentarius.net/index-en.stm.Google Scholar
Code of Federal Regulations (2001) Title 21 – Food and Drugs. Part 556 – Tolerances for Residues of New Animal Drugs in Food. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/21cfr556_01.html.Google Scholar
Coe, JE, Ishak, KG, Ward, JM & Ross, MJ (1992) Tamoxifen prevents induction of hepatic neoplasia by zeranol, an estrogenic food contaminant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 89, 1085–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulston, F & Korte, F (1976) Anabolic Agents in Animal Production. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Publishers.Google ScholarPubMed
Cram, EJ, Liu, BD, Bjeldanes, LF & Firestone, GL (2001) Indole-3-carbinol inhibits CDK6 expression in human MCF-7 breast cancer cells by disrupting Sp1 transcription factor interactions with a composite element in the CDK6 gene promoter. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 22332–22340.Google Scholar
Cunningham, EP (2000) Traceability from farm to consumption. In Proceedings of the 46th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, pp.798–801 [Lasta, J editor]. Argentina: Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Daxenberger, A, Ibarreta, D & Meyer, HHD (2001) Possible health impact of animal oestrogens in food. Human Reproduction Update 7, 340–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department for Environment Food Rural Affairs (2002) Compulsory Origin Labelling from 1 January 2002. http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodrin/beeflab/beeflab.htm.Google Scholar
Dieckman, WJ, Davis, ME, Rynkiewicz, SH & Pottinger, RE (1953) Does administration of diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy have therapeutic value? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 66, 1062–1075.Google Scholar
Doren, M (2001) Prevention of osteoporosis – role of hormonal replacement therapy and selective oestrogen receptor modulators. Actuelle Rheumatologie 26, 187–194.Google Scholar
European Commission (1996) Scientific Conference on Growth Promotion in Meat Production. Proceedings. Brussels and Luxembourg: EC Commission D-G VI.Google Scholar
European Commission (2000) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/him/him0l_en.pdf???.Google Scholar
European Commission (2001a) Hormones – The Precautionary Principle – No to Cattle Growth Promoters. http://www. fst.rdg.ac.uk/foodlaw/news/eu-01–20.htm.Google Scholar
El-Hefnawy, T, Manna, PR, Luconi, M, Baldi, E, Slotte, JP & Huhtaniemi, I (2000) Progesterone action in a murine Leydig tumour cell line (mLTC-1) possibly through a non classical receptor type. Endocrinology 141, 247–255.Google Scholar
Enmark, E & Gustafsson, JA (1998) Estrogen receptor β – a novel receptor opens up new possibilities for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Endocrine-Related Cancer 5, 213–222.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, DW, Picken, CA, Murphy, LC & Buhr, M (1989) Measurement of the relative binding affinity of zearalenone, α-zearalenol and β-zearalenol for uterine and oviduct estrogen receptors in swine, rats and chickens: an indicator of estrogenic potencies. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 94, 691–694.Google ScholarPubMed
Galbraith, H & Berry, AD (1994) Effect of naturally occurring and synthetic androgens on growth, body composition and muscle glucocorteroid receptors in wether lambs. Animal Production 58, 357–364.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H, Hatendi, PR, Alderson, EM & Scaife, JR (1990) The effect of cimaterol and oestradiol-17β alone or combined on growth and body composition of wether lambs. Animal Production 51, 311–320.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H, Singh, SB & Scaife, JR (1997) Response of castrated male sheep to oestrogenic and androgenic compounds implanted alone or in combination. Animal Science 64, 261–269.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H & Topps, JH (1981) Effect of hormones on the growth and body composition of animals. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 51, 521–540.Google Scholar
Grazzini, E, Guillon, G, Mouillac, B & Zingg, HH (1998) Inhibition of oxytocin receptor function by direct binding of progesterone. Nature 392, 509–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, JA (1999) Estrogen receptor β – a new dimension in oestrogen mechanism of action. Journal of Endocrinology 163, 379–383.Google Scholar
Hageleit, M, Daxenberger, A, Kraetzl, W-D, Kettler, A & Meyer, HHD (2000) Dose-dependent effects of melengestrol acetate (MGA) on plasma levels of oestradiol, progesterone and luteinizing hormone in cycling heifers and influences on oestrogen residues in edible tissues. APMIS 108, 847–854.Google Scholar
Hall, JM, Crouse, JF & Korach, KS (2001) The multifaceted mechanisms of estradiol and estrogen receptor signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 36869–36872.Google Scholar
Hancock, DL, Wagner, JF & Anderson, DC (1991) Effect of estrogens and androgens on animal growth. In Growth Regulation in Farm Animals, pp.255–298 [Pearson, AM and Dutson, TR editors]. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Handelsman, DJ, Conway, AJ, Howe, CJ, Turner, L & Mackey, MA (1996) Establishing the minimum effective dose and additive effects of depot progestin in suppression of human spermatogenesis by a testosterone depot. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 81, 4113–4121.Google Scholar
Hartmann, S, Lacorn, M & Steinhart, H (1998) Natural occurrence of steroid hormones in food. Food Chemistry 62, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitzman, RJ (1976) The effectiveness of anabolic agents in increasing rate of growth in farm animals: Report on experiments in cattle. In Anabolic Agents in Animal Production, pp.89–98 [Coulston, F and Korte, F editors]. Stuttgart: George Thieme.Google Scholar
Hendricks, DM, Brandt, RT Jr, Titgemeyer, EC & Milton, CT (1997) Serum concentrations of trenbolone-17β and oestradiol-17 β and performance of heifers treated with trenbolone acetate, melengestrol acetate or oestradiol-17β. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2627–2633.Google Scholar
Hendricks, DM, Gray, SL, Owenby, JJ & Lackey, BR (2001) Residues from anabolic preparations after good veterinary practice. APMIS 109, 273–283.Google Scholar
Hilakivi-Clarke, L, Cabanes, A, Olivios, , Kerr, L, Bouker, KB & Clarke, R (2002) Do estrogens always increase breast cancer risk? Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 80, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, AV, Ayala-Torres, S, Thompson, EB & Liehr, JG (1998) Estrogen-induced microsatellite DNA alterations are associated with Syrian hamster kidney tumorigenesis. Carcinogenesis 19, 2169–2172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoogenboom, LAP, De Haan, L, Hooijerink, D, Bor, G, Murk, AJ & Brouwer, A (2001) Estrogenic activity of estradiol and its metabolites in the ER-CALUX assay with human T47D breast cells. APMIS 109, 101–107.Google Scholar
Hurst, DR (1998) Hormones: European Communities – Measures Affecting Meat and Meat Products. http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol9/No1/sr1g.html.Google Scholar
Ibarreta, D, Daxenberger, A & Meyer, HHD (2001) Possible health impact of phytoestrogens and xenoestrogens in food. APMIS 109, 161–184.Google Scholar
International Agency for Research on Cancer (1987) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, supplement no. 7. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC monographs volumes 1 to 42. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
International Agency for Research on Cancer (1999) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans vol. 72. Hormonal contraception and post menopausal hormone therapy. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (1988) Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. WHO Technical Report Series, no.763. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (1989) Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. WHO Technical Report Series, no.788. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (1990) Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. WHO Technical Report Series, no.799. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (2000 a) Toxicological evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. WHO Food Additive Series, no.43. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (2000 b) Toxicological evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. WHO Food Additive Series, no.45. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Jégou, B (2001) General discussion. Existing guidelines for the use of meat hormones and other food additives in Europe and USA. APMIS 109, Suppl. 103, S551–S556.Google Scholar
Karg, H & Meyer, HHD (1999) Update evaluation of trenbolone|acetate, zeranol and melengesterol acetate as growth promoters (considerations concerning the ‘hormone issues’ between the EU and USA at the WTO). Archiv für Lebensmittel Hygiene 50, 28–37.Google Scholar
Kirk, CJ, Harris, RM, Wood, DM, Waring, RH & Hughes, PJ (2001) Do dietary phytoestrogens influence susceptibility to hormone-dependent cancer by disrupting the metabolism of endogenous oestrogens?. Biochemical Society Transactions 29, 209–216.Google Scholar
Klein, KO, Baron, J, Colli, JH, McDonnel, DP & Cutler, GB (1994) Estrogen levels in childhood determined by ultra-sensitive recombinant cell bioassay. Journal of Clinical Investigation 94, 2475–2480.Google Scholar
Klip, H, Verloop, J, van Gool, JD, Koster, META, Burger, CW & van Leeuwen, FE (2002) Hypospadias in sons of women exposed to diethylstibestrol in utero: a cohort study. Lancet 359, 1102–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamming, GE (1987) Scientific report on anabolic agents in animal production. Veterinary Record 121, 389–392.Google Scholar
Lange, IG, Daxenberger, A & Meyer, HHD (2001) Hormone contents in peripheral tissues after correct and off-label use of growth promoting implants in cattle: Effect of the implant preparations Finaplix-H, Ralgro, Synovex-H and Synovex Plus. APMIS 109, 53–65.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, JW, Goyings, LS, Krzeminski, LF, & Zimbelman, RG (1977) Studies of a progestogen (MGA) as related to residues and human consumption. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 3, 5–33.Google Scholar
Le Guevel, R & Pakdel, F (2001) Assessment of oestrogenic potency of chemicals used as growth promoter by in-vitro methods. Human Reproduction 16, 1030–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, DH & Dickson, RB (2002) Roles of androgens in the development, growth and carcinogenesis of the mammary gland. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 80, 175–189.Google Scholar
Liehr, JG (2000) Is estradiol a genotoxic mutagenic carcinogen?. Endocrine Reviews 21, 40–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Liehr, JG (2001) Genotoxicity of the steroidal oestrogens oestrone and oestradiol: possible mechanism of uterine and mammary cancer development. Human Reproduction Update 7, 273–281.Google Scholar
Liehr, JG & Wheeler, WJ (1983) Inhibition of estrogen induced renal carcinoma in Syrian hamsters by vitamin C. Cancer Research 43, 4638–4642.Google ScholarPubMed
MacVinish, LJ & Galbraith, H (1988) The effect of implantation of trenbolone acetate and oestradiol-17β in wether lambs at two initial live weights on concentrations of steroidal residues and blood glucose, urea and thyroid hormones. Animal Production 47, 75–85.Google Scholar
MacVinish, LJ & Galbraith, H (1993) A note on the concentrations of steroidal residues in tissues of mature female sheep implanted with trenbolone acetate. Animal Production 56, 277–280.Google Scholar
Maume, D, Deceuninck, Y, Pouponeau, K, Paris, A, Le Bizec, B & André, F (2001) Assessment of estradiol and its metabolites in meat. APMIS 109, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meissonnier, E (1983) Anabolics in Animal Production. Paris: Office International des Epizooties.Google Scholar
Metzler, M & Pfeiffer, E (2001) Genotoxic potential of xenobiotic growth promoters and their metabolites. APMIS 109, 89–95.Google Scholar
Meyer, HHD (2001) Biochemistry and physiology of anabolic hormones used for improvement of meat production. APMIS 109, 1–8.Google Scholar
Meyer, HHD & Rapp, M (1985) Estrogen receptor in bovine skeletal muscle. Journal of Animal Science 60, 294–300.Google Scholar
Nef, S & Parada, LF (2000) Hormones in male sexual development. Genes and Development 14, 3075–3086.Google Scholar
Neuman, F (1975) Pharmacological and endocrinological studies on anabolic agents. In Anabolic Agents in Animal Production, pp.253–264 [Coulston, F and Korte, F editors]. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Publishers.Google Scholar
Newbold, RR (2001) Effects of developmental exposure to diethylstibestrol (DES) in rodents: clues for other environmental estrogens. APMIS 109, Suppl. 103, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikov, GN, Eshete, M, Rajnarayanan, RV & Alworth, WL (2001) Interactions of synthetic oestrogens with human estrogen receptors. Journal of Endocrinology 170, 137–145.Google Scholar
Olefsky, JM (2001) Nuclear receptor mini review series. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 36863–36864.Google Scholar
Owens, FN, Gill, DR, Dolezal, G, Morgan, JB & Horn, GW (1997) Symposium: Impact of Implants on Performance and Carcass Value of Beef Cattle. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Paris, A, Goutal, I, Richard, J, Bécret, A & Guéraud, F (2001) Uterotrophic effect of a saturated fatty acid 17-ester of estradiol-17β administered orally to juvenile rats. APMIS 109, 365–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennie, WD, Aldridge, TC & Brooks, AN (1998) Differential activation by xenoestrogens of ERα and ERβ when linked to different response elements. Journal of Endocrinology 158, R11–R14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pentikainen, V, Erkkila, K, Suomalainen, L, Parvinen, M & Dunkel, L (2000) Estradiol acts as a germ cell survival factor in the human testis in vitro. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 85, 2057–2067.Google Scholar
Perez Martinez, C, Ferreras Estrada, MC, Garcia Iglebias, MJ, BravoMoral, AM, Espinosa Alvarez, J & Escudero Diez, A (1997) Effects of in utero exposure to nonsterosteroidal estrogens on mouse testis. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 61, 94–98.Google Scholar
Pfaffl, MW, Lange, IG, Daxenberger, A & Meyer, HHD (2001) Tissue specific expression pattern of estrogen receptors (ER): Quantification of ERα and ERβ mRNA with real-time RT-PCR. APMIS 109, 345–355.Google Scholar
Preston, RL (1997) Rationale for the safety of implants. In Impact of Implants on Performance and Carcass Value of Beef Cattle, pp.199–203 [ Owens, FN, Gill, DR, Dolezal, G, Morgan, JB and Horn, GW, organisers]. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Preston, RL (1999) Hormone containing growth promoting implants in farmed livestock. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 38, 123–138.Google Scholar
Rahman, KM & Sarkar, FH (2002) Steroid hormone mimics: molecular mechanisms of cell growth and apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 80, 191–202.Google Scholar
Rajah, TT & Pento, JT (1995) The mutagenic potential of antioestrogens at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. Research Communications in Molecular Pathology and Pharmacology 89, 85–92.Google Scholar
Richards, JA, Petrel, TA & Brueggemeier, RW (2002) Signaling pathways regulating aromatase and cyclooxygenases in normal and malignant breast cells. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 80, 203–212.Google Scholar
Rilianwati, , Kero, J, Paukku, T & Huhtaniemi, I (2000) Long term testosterone treatment prevents gonadal and adrenal tumorigenesis of mice transgenic for the mouse inhibin α promoter/simian virus T-antigen fusion gene. Journal of Endocrinology 166, 77–85.Google Scholar
Roche, JF & O'Callaghan, D (1982) Manipulation of Growth in Farm Animals. Maryland: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Russo, J, Hu, YF, Tahin, Q, Mihaila, D, Slater, C, Lareef, MH & Russo, IH (2001) Carcinogenicity of estrogens in human breast epithelial cells. APMIS 109, 39–52.Google Scholar
Russo,, J, Lareef, MH, Tahin, Q, Hu, Y-F, Slater, C, Ao, X & Russo, IH (2002) 17β-estradiol is carcinogenic in human breast epithelial cells. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 80, 149–162.Google Scholar
Schiffer, B, Daxenberger, A, Meyer, K & Meyer, HHD (2001) The fate of trenbolone acetate and melengestrol acetate after application as growth promoters in cattle: environmental studies. Environmental Health Perspectives 109, 1145–1151.Google Scholar
Schiffmann, D, Hieber, L, Schmuck, G, Pecham, R, Metzler, M & Henschler, D (1988) Trenbolone induces micronucleus formation and neoplastic formation in Syrian hamster fibroblasts but not in mouse C3H10TI/2 cells. Archives of Toxicology 62, 49–53.Google Scholar
Schiffmann, D, Metzler, M, Neudecker, T & Henschler, D (1985) Morphological transformations of Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts by the anabolic agent trenbolone. Archives of Toxicology 58, 59–63.Google Scholar
Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health (1999) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health. Assessment of Potential Risks to Human Health from Hormone Residues in Bovine Meat and Meat Products. European Commission D-G XXIV. http://europa.eu.int/comm/ food/fs/sc/scv/out21_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health (2000) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health on ‘Review of Specific Documents Relating to the SCVPH Opinion of 30 April 99 on Potential Risks to Human Health from Hormone Residues in Bovine Meat and Meat Products (adopted on 03 May 2000)’. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scv/out33_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health (2002) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health on ‘Review of Previous SCVPH Opinions of 30 April 1999 and 3 May 2000 on the Potential Risks to Human Health from Hormone Residues in Bovine Meat and Meat Products (adopted on 10 April 2002)’. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scv/out50_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, PM, Buttery, PJ & Haynes, NB (1986) The effect of manipulating growth in sheep by diet or anabolic agents on plasma cortisol and muscle glucocorticoid receptors. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 289–304.Google Scholar
Sirtori, CR (2001) Risks and benefits of soy phytoestrogens in cardiovascular disease, cancer, climacteric symptoms and osteoporosis. Drug Safety 24, 665–682.Google Scholar
Stefano, GB, Prevot, V, Beauvillain J-C, Cadet, P, Fimiani, C, Welters, I, Fricchione, GL, Breton, C, Lassalle, P, Salzet, M & Bilfinger, TV (2000) Cell surface estrogen receptors mediate calcium dependent nitric oxide release in human endothelia. Circulation 101, 1594–1597.Google Scholar
Stephany, RW (2000) Hormones Found in Meat Samples from Regular Controls Within the European Union and from US Imports. http://www.chemical-awareness.com/news.php?nid=13&aid=286Google Scholar
Stephany, RW (2001) Hormones in meat: different approaches in the EU and in the USA. APMIS 109, Suppl. 103, s357–s364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sub-group of the Veterinary Products Committee (1999) Executive Summary and Critical Evaluation of the Scientific Reasoning and Method of Argument Adopted in SCVPH (1999). London: MAFF.Google Scholar
Thayer, KA, Ruhlen, RL, Howdeshell, KL, Buchanan, DL, Cooke, PS, Preziosi, D, Welshons, WV, Haseman, J & vom Saal, FS (2001) Altered prostate growth and daily sperm production in male mice exposed prenatally to subclinical doses of 17α-ethinyl oestradiol. Human Reproduction 16, 988–996.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, PA, Bissonnette, N, Bedard, SK, Hunting, D & Paquette, B (1998) Induction by estrogens of methotrexate-resistance in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 19, 1545–1552.Google Scholar
Vernon, BG & Buttery, PJ (1978) Protein turnover in rats treated with trenbolone acetate. British Journal of Nutrition 36, 575–579.Google Scholar
vom Saal, FS & Finch, CE (1988) Reproductive senescence: phenomena and mechanisms in mammals and selected vertebrates. In The Physiology of Reproduction, pp.2365 [Knobil, E and Neill, J editors]. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Wetteman, RP & Lehman, F (1997) Buller steers – causes and control. In Impact of Implants on Performance and Carcass Value of Beef Cattle, pp.123–128 [ Owens, FN, Gill, DR, Dolezal, G, Morgan, JB and Horn, GW, organisers]. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Wiseman, H & Duffy, R (2001) New advances in understanding of the role of steroids and steroid receptors in disease. Biochemical Society Transactions 29, 205–209.Google Scholar
Xie, W, Barwick, JL, Simon, CM, Pierce, AM, Safe, S, Blumberg, B, Guzelian, PS & Evans, RM (2000) Reciprocal activation of xenobiotic response genes by nuclear receptors SXR/PXR and CAR. Genes and Development 14, 3014–3023.Google Scholar
Xie, W & Evans, RM (2001) Orphan nuclear receptors: The exotics of xenobiotics. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 37739–37742.Google Scholar
Zacharewski, T (1997) In vitro bioassays for assessing estrogenic substances. Environmental Science and Technology 31, 613–623.Google Scholar
Zarkawi, M, Galbraith, H & Hutchinson, JSM (1991a) Influence of trenbolone acetate, zeranol and oestradiol-17β implantation on growth performance and reproductive function in beef heifers. Animal Production 52, 249–253.Google Scholar
Zarkawi, M, Galbraith, H & Hutchinson, JSM (1991b) The action of trenbolone acetate, a synthetic anabolic agent on ovarian function in the guinea pig. Laboratory Animals 25, 117–121.Google Scholar
Zhu, LJ, Hardy, MP, Inigo, IV, Huhtaniemi, I, Bardin CW & Moo-Young, AJ (2000) Effects of androgen on androgen receptor expression in rat testicular and epididymal cells: a quantitative immunohistochemical study. Biology of Reproduction 63, 368–376.Google Scholar