Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:03:58.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

163-3 Comments on expansion of non-medical prescribing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News Update
Information
Nurse Prescriber , First View , pp. 2 - 3
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

eReferences

http://www.rcpe.ac.uk/policy/archive/2006/MLX-334.php; accessed 19/12.
http://www.rpsgb.org.uk/pdfs/consdoc1218.pdf; accessed 19/12.
http://www.college-optometrists.org/index.aspx/pcms/site.News_and_Events.Press_Release_Archive.2006.College_backs_independent_prescribing_for_optometrists/; accessed 5/1.
Holmes K. Maintaining prescribing standards should silence the critics. Nurse Prescribing 2006; 4 (10): 413–415.
http://www.lmc.org.uk/news/NC.html#camden; accessed 5/1.
Robinson F. Was nurse prescribing a step too far? Practice Nurse 2006; 32 (9): 10–12.