Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:18:00.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Participation in the Milk Diversion Program in the U.S. and New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

David R. Lee  and
Richard N. Boisvert
David R. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Richard N. Boisvert
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Get access

Abstract

Participation in the 1984–85 Milk Diversion Program (MDP) is examined through the analysis of aggregate state level data for the U.S. and county level data from New York. Linear probability, logit and probit models of participation are estimated. The empirical results are highly similar across models and identify the important determinants of farmer participation in the MDP. Models explaining contracted diversion levels are also estimated but do not have the explanatory power of the participation models. The implications of the results for the analysis of U.S. dairy policy alternatives are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 193 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank Elizabeth Bailey for research assistance and Andrew Novakovic for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

References

Amemiya, T. “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (December 1981):1483–1536.Google Scholar
Boynton, R., and Novakovic, A. “A Summary and Interpretation of ASCS Rules and Procedures Governing the Operation of the Milk Diversion Program (MDP).” Staff Paper 84-1, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, January 1984a.Google Scholar
Boynton, R., and Novakovic, A. “Dairy Farmers Must Decide.” Hoard's Dairyman, January 10, 1984b.Google Scholar
Boynton, R., and Novakovic, A. “The Impact of the Milk Diversion Program on Milk Production in New York.” A.E. Ext. 84-3, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, March 1984c.Google Scholar
Boynton, R., and Novakovic, A. “The Impact of the Milk Diversion Program on U.S. Milk Production.” A.E. Ext. 84-4, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, March 1984d.Google Scholar
Capps, O. Jr., and Kramer, R. A. “Analysis of Food Stamp Participation Using Qualitative Choice Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (1985):49–59.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. G., and Foster, W. E. “Participation in the Farmer-Owned Reserve Program: A Discrete Choice Model.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (1983):120–24.Google Scholar
Domencich, T., and McFadden, D. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1975.Google Scholar
Federal Order No. 2, The Marketing Administrator's Bulletin. October, 1984.Google Scholar
Kramer, R., and Pope, R. “Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (1981):119–28.Google Scholar
Lee, D. R., and Helmberger, P. G. “Estimating Supply Response in the Presence of Farm Programs.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985):193–203.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
New York State Crop Reporting Service. New York Agricultural Statistics, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany. 1983.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R., and Rubinfeld, D. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.Google Scholar
Rahm, M., and Huffman, W. “The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (1984):405–413.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Crop Reporting Board. Milk Production, Disposition, and Income. Annual Summaries, 1981–83.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Census of Agriculture, Washington D.C. 1978, 1982.Google Scholar