Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:28:53.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of Two Alternative Funding Sources for Northeast Banks Lending to Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Kenneth Carraro  and
Eddy LaDue
Kenneth Carraro
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Eddy LaDue
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Get access

Abstract

A survey of agricultural banks in New York State found that inability to compete with the low interest rates offered by the Farm Credit Service (FCS) rather than the unavailability of funds per se was limiting agricultural lending by commercial banks. A MASI-like intermediary would (1) be of assistance only to banks unable to use loan participations and with high CD costs and (2) would likely require a large multistate area to be feasible. Only eight percent of the New York banks serving agriculture qualify for FICB funding. Further, FICB funding would be profitable only if banks experienced illiquidity at least 50 percent of the time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , April 1985 , pp. 78 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Report of Income and Report of Condition. Magnetic Tapes, December 31, 1982.Google Scholar
Carraro, Kenneth. Two Alternative Methods of Funding Agricultural Loans for Commercial Banks in New York State. , Cornell University, 1984.Google Scholar
Carraro, Kenneth and LaDue, Eddy. An Economic Evaluation of Alternative Sources of Funding for Agricultural Lending By Commercial Banks. Department of Agricultural Economics Research Bulletin 84-87. Cornell University, 1985.Google Scholar
LaDue, Eddy. Influence of the Farm Credit System Stock Requirement on Actual Interest Rates. Agricultural Finance Review. Vol. 43, 1983.Google Scholar
LaDue, Eddy, Moss, Jerry and Smith, Robert. “The Profitability of Agricultural Loans by Commercial Banks.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council. Vol. 7, No. 1, April 1978.Google Scholar
Melichar, Emanuel and Balides, Paul. Agricultural Finance Databook. Washington, DC: Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, various dates.Google Scholar