Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T18:04:02.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partial intersubjectivity and sufficient understandings for current practical purposes: On a specialized practice in Swedish conversation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2016

Per Linell  and
Jan Lindström
Per Linell
Affiliation:
Department of Education, Communication and Learning, Göteborg University, P.O. Box 300, SE-40530 Göteborg, Sweden. [email protected]
Jan Lindström
Affiliation:
Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 24 (Unioninkatu 40), 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper explores issues of intersubjectivity and shared understanding as they arise in dyadic spoken interaction. Using data from Swedish conversations, we approach the topic by focusing on the functions of a reactive construction that occurs in situations when a linguistic expression (x) has been used in a prior utterance, and this expression is found to be only partially acceptable in the situation at hand. It is therefore reacted to by one of the interlocutors, and negotiated in a new turn initiated by x-å-x, i.e. a unit in which two identical copies of x are conjoined by å ‘and’, and then expanded by a supporting argument. The pragmatic functions of the construction include that of suggesting a sufficient clarification of what should be a reasonable situated meaning and an intersubjective basis for ensuing talk.

Keywords

conversationintersubjectivityreactive constructionsocial interactionsubjectivitysufficient clarification and understandingSwedishx-å-x
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 39 , Special Issue 2: Discourse, Grammar and Intersubjectivity , October 2016 , pp. 113 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auer, Peter. 1996. The pre-front field is spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position. Pragmatics 6 (3), 295–322.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2009. Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs 76 (2), 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A.. 2005. A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: ‘Concessive Repair’. In Hakulinen, Auli & Selting, Margret (eds.), Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, 257–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Mary C.. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 64, 501–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita. 2012. Naja, normal und normal. Zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der x-und-x-Konstruktion im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola. 2005. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective, 11–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [New edn. 1984 [1992].Oxford: Polity Press]Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1967. Some functions of gaze direction in two-person conversations. Acta Psychologica 26, 22–63.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Fanshel, David. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda. 2004. Political interviews as hybrid genre. Text 24, 353–397.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics 17, 365–399. [Also in Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), 1992. Talk at Work, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan. 1999. Vackert, vackert! Syntaktisk reduplication i svenskan [Nice, nice! Syntactic reduplication in Swedish] (Studier i nordisk filologi 77). Helsinki: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan. 2006. Grammar in the service of interaction: Exploring turn organization in Swedish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (1), 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan. 2008. Tur och ordning: introduktion till svensk samtalsgrammatik [Turns in order: Introduction to Swedish conversational grammar]. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan & Linell, Per. 2007. Roli å roli: X-och-x som samtalspraktik och grammatisk konstruktion [Funny and funny: X-and-x as a conversational practice and a grammatical construction]. In Engdahl, Elisabet & Londen, Anne-Marie (eds.), Interaktion och kontext: nio studier av svenska samtal [Interaction and context: Nine studies of Swedish conversations], 19–89. Lund: Studentlitteratur. [Reprinted in Linell 2011: 88–161]Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009a. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009b. Grammatical constructions in dialogue. In Bergs, Alexander & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), Contexts and Constructions, 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2011. Språkande: samtal, språk och grammatik [Languaging: Talk, language and grammar] (Studies in Language and Culture 17). Linköping: Department of Communication and Culture.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2014. Interactivities, intersubjectivities and language: On dialogism and phenomenology. Language and Dialogue 4, 165–193.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. Forthcoming. Intersubjectivity in dialogue. Forthcoming in Edda Weigand (ed.), Language and Dialogue: A Handbook of the Key Issues in the Field. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Linell, Per & Mertzlufft, Christine. 2014. Evidence for a Dialogical Grammar: Reactive constructions in Swedish and German. In Günthner, Susanne, Imo, Wolfgang & Bücker, Jörg (eds.), Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, 79–108. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas. 2002. On the methodology of (oral) genres. In Linell, Per & Aronsson, Karin (eds.), Jagen och rösterna: Goffman, Viveka och samtalet [Selves and voices: Goffman, Viveka and the conversation] (Studies in Communication 42), 319–337. Linköping: Tema Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Myrendal, Jenny. 2015. Word Meaning Negotiation in Online Discussion Forum Communication. Gothenburg: Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Norén, Kerstin & Linell, Per. 2007. Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and contexts: Some empirical substantiations. Pragmatics 17, 387–416.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar. 1974. On Message Structure. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Givón, Talmy (ed.), Discourse and Syntax (Syntax and Semantics 12), 261–286. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1991. Conversation Analysis and socially shared cognition. In Resnick, Lauren, Levine, John & Teasley, Stephanie (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 150–171. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 95, 1295–1345.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Interaction and Grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. Commonsense and scientific interpretations of human action. In Schutz, Alfred, Collected Papers, vol. 1, 3–47. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2014. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Brems, Liselotte, Ghesquière, Lobke & Van de Velde, Freek (eds.), Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse, 7–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar