Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:23:48.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jan Terje Faarlund: Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 50. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1990. 219 pp.

Review products

Jan Terje Faarlund: Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 50. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1990. 219 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Robert P. Stockwell  and
Karn King
Robert P. Stockwell
Affiliation:
UCLA, Los Angeles, CA90024, USA
Karn King
Affiliation:
UCLA, Los Angeles, CA90024, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , June 1993 , pp. 60 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chimsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Farmer, A. 1980. On the Interaction of Morphology and Syntax. Ph.D diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Baltin, A. & Kroch, A. 1989. Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hale, K. 1983. Walpiri and the Grammar of Non-configurational Languages. NLLT 1,5–47.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. & May, R. 1981. Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing LR 1, 41–79.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. 1975. On the Change from SOV to SVO: Evidence from Niger Congo, Linguistics 1975, 113–48.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H. 1986. Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, A. van. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, H. 1987. On the Syntax of Verb Chains in Bambara, ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
Koopman, H. & Sportiche, D. 1990. Subjects. LI.Google Scholar
Koopman, H. & Sportiche, D. 1982. Variables and the Projection Principle. LR 2, 139–160.Google Scholar
Li, C. (ed.) 1975. Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
May, R. 1985. Logical Form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McKnight, G. 1893. The Primitive Teutonic Order of Words. JEGP 1, 136–219.Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. 1990. Movement, Agreement and Case. ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. 1982. A Formal Theory of Configurational Phenomena. NELS 12 (Pustejovsky, & Sell, , eds.)Google Scholar
Stowell, T. 1983. Subjects across Categories. LR 2, 285–312.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. 1989. Subjects, Specifiers and X-bar Theory. In Baltin, A. & Kroch, A. (eds.) Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 1975. An Explanation of Drift. In Li, C. (ed.) Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 269–305.Google Scholar
Wurff, W. 1990. Diffusion and Reanalysis in Syntax. Univ. of Amsterdam Diss.Google Scholar