Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:30:40.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on extraction from V2 clauses in Scandinavian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2010

Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson
Affiliation:
Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Box 201, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. [email protected], [email protected]
Kristine Bentzen
Affiliation:
CASTL, Department of Languages and Linguistics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. [email protected]
Anna-Lena Wiklund
Affiliation:
Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Box 201, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This short communication presents a general overview of facts concerning wh-extraction from V2 clauses in the Scandinavian languages. While extraction from V2 clauses with a fronted non-subject is impossible in all of these languages, three classes can be distinguished with regard to extraction from subject-initial V2 clauses.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bentzen, Kristine. 2005. What's the better move? On verb placement in Standard and Northern Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28 (2), 153188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine. To appear. Exploring embedded main clause phenomena: The irrelevance of factivity and some challenges from V2 languages. Theoretical Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg & Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2007. Extracting from V2. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 79, 119128.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Pancheva, Roumyana. 2006. Conditionals. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. I, 638687. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbacz, Piotr. 2010. Word Order in Övdalian: A Study in Variation and Change. Fil.dr dissertation, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.Google Scholar
de Haan, Germen. 2001. More is going on upstairs than downstairs: Embedded root phenomena in West Frisian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4 (1), 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34 (4), 640649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, Sorace, Antonella & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2010. V-to-I and V2 in subordinate clauses: An investigation of Faroese in relation to Icelandic and Danish. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13 (1), 6197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Fil.dr dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. To appear. Verb second. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Kiss, Tibor (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, 2nd edn, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 465497.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn & Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2010. AGR & V2. Theoretical Linguistics 36 (1), 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg, Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Bentzen, Kristine & Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2007. The afterglow of verb movement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80, 4575.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2007. Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80, 103161.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje. 2009. Comp-T effects: Variation in the position and features of C. Studia Linguistica 63 (2), 204232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2010. On the relation between V2 and the second position cliticization. Lingua 120 (2), 329353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1996. Extractions from verb-second clauses in German. In Lutz, Ulli & Pafel, Jürgen (eds.), On Extraction and Extraposition in German, 4588. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, 281337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2006. Strong vs. weak islands. In Everaert, Martin & Riemsdijk, Henk van (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. I, 479531. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the Nominative Island Condition, Vacuous Application and the That-trace Filter. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2010. Predictable and unpredictable sources of variable verb and adverb placement in Scandinavian. Lingua 120 (5), 10621088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2004. Faroese: An Overview and Reference Grammar. Tórshavn & Reykjavík: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag & Háskólaútgáfan.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2010. In search of the force of dependent verb second. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 33 (1), 8191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Bentzen, Kristine, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119, 19141938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2007. Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10, 203233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar