Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T01:12:55.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving in small steps towards verb second: A case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2012

Christian Waldmann
Christian Waldmann*
Affiliation:
Umeå University, Department of Language Studies, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines rule-based learning and item-based learning in relation to a Swedish child's acquisition of verb second in main clauses. While rule-based accounts assert that young children have access to syntactic structure and acquire a rule of generalized verb second, item-based accounts claim that young children are reproducing frequent word combinations in the input. The paper provides new and important data from one Swedish child, concluding that the acquisition of verb second is the result of rule-based learning.

Keywords

child language acquisitionconstructivist approachesgenerativist approachesitem-based learningrule-based learningSwedishverb movementverb placementverb second
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 331 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akhtar, Nameera. 1999. Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language 26, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, Ben, Rowland, Caroline F., Theakston, Anna L. & Tomasello, Michael. 2006. Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’. Journal of Child Language 33, 519–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine, Rodina, Yulia & Westergaard, Marit. 2010. The acquisition of apparent optionality: Word order in subject and object shift constructions in Norwegian. In Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine & Westergaard, Marit (eds.), Variation in the Input: Studies in the Acquisition of Word Order, 241–270. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma. 2003. From Root Infinitive to Finite Sentences: The Acquisition of Verbal Inflections and Auxiliaries. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, Ute. 1999. Icelandic plus English: Language Differentiation and Functional Categories in a Successively Bilingual Child. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Boser, Katherine, Lust, Barbara, Marie Santelmann, Lynn & Whitman, John. 1992. The syntax of CP and V-2 in early child German (ECG): The strong continuity hypothesis. North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 22, 51–65.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald. 1990/1991. Constraint on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition 1 (4), 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, Harald (ed.). 1996. Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, Harald, Eisenbeiss, Sonja & Penke, Martina. 1996. Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In Clahsen (ed.), 129–160.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Penke, Martina. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In Meisel (ed.), 181–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, Harald, Penke, Martina & Parodi, Teresa. 1993/1994. Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition 3 (4), 395–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Abraham, Werner (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania: Papers from the 3rd Groningen Grammar Talks, Groningen, January 1981, 47–131. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritzenschaft, Agnes, Gawlitzek-Maiwald, Ira, Tracy, Rosemarie & Winkler, Susanne. 1990. Wege zur komplexen Syntax. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 9, 52–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne & Noonan, Máire. 1992. Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique 37 (2), 241–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina. 1994. VP, null arguments, and COMP projections. In Hoekstra, Teun & Schwartz, Bonnie D. (eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, 21–56. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics 28, 1407–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 1996. The acquisition of object shift in Swedish child language. In Johnson, Carolyn E. & Gilbert, John H. (eds.), Children's Language, 153–165. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2002. The use and function of non-finite root clauses in Swedish child language. Language Acquisition 10 (4), 273–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2003a. Input and output: Sentence patterns in child and adult Swedish. In Josefsson et al. (eds.), 95–133.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2003b. Non-target structures and non-target uses in child and adult Swedish. In Josefsson et al. (eds.), 155–193.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög, Platzack, Christer & Håkansson, Gisela (eds.). 2003. The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.). 2001. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Sven & Larsson, Kenneth. 1977. Studier i det tidiga barnspråkets grammatik. Ms., Stockholm University.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. (ed.). 1992. The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Natascha. 1994. Parameters cannot be reset: Evidence from the development of COMP. In Meisel, Jürgen M. (ed.), Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development, 235–269. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2001. T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Kenstowicz (ed.), 355–426.Google Scholar
Pierce, Amy E. 1992. Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1990. A grammar without functional categories: A syntactic study of early Swedish child language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 13, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1992. Functional categories and early Swedish. In Meisel (ed.), 63–82.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1996. The initial hypothesis of syntax: A minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition. In Clahsen (ed.), 369–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 2008. Uninterpretable features and EPP: A minimalist account of language build-up and break-down. In Liceras, Juana M., Zobl, Helmut & Goodluck, Helen (eds.), The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, 48–80. New York & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Plunkett, Kim & Strömqvist, Sven. 1992. The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, 457–556. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Poeppel, David & Wexler, Ken. 1993. The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69 (1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richthoff, Ulla. 2000. En svensk barnspråkskorpus: Uppbyggnad och analyser. MA dissertation, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rowland, Caroline F. & Pine, Julian M.. 2000. Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘What children do know?’. Journal of Child Language 27, 157–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, Caroline F. & Pine, Julian M.. 2003. The development of inversion in wh-questions: A reply to Van Valin. Journal of Child Language 30, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santelmann, Lynn Marie. 1995. The Acquisition of Verb Second Grammar in Child Swedish: Continuity of Universal Grammar in Wh-questions, Topicalization and Verb Raising. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Santelmann, Lynn Marie. 2003. The acquisition of Swedish wh-questions. In Josefsson et al. (eds.), 261–307.Google Scholar
Schlichting, Liesbeth. 1996. Discovering Syntax: An Empirical Study in Dutch Language Acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Vikner, Sten. 1996. The verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. In Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, 11–62. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 1999. Root infinitives and null subjects in early Icelandic. In Greenhill, Annabel, Littlefield, Heather & Tano, Cheryl (eds.), The 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 630–641. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven, Richtoff, Ulla & Andersson, Anders-Börje. 1993. Strömqvist's and Richtoff's Corpora: A Guide to Longitudinal Data from Four Swedish Children (Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 66). Göteborg: Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.Google Scholar
Stromswold, Karin. 1990. Learnability and the Acquisition of Auxiliaries. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan, Andersson, Erik & Christensen, Lisa. 1999a. Svenska Akademiens grammatik. Ord. Stockholm: Norstedts ordbok.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan, Andersson, Erik & Christensen, Lisa. 1999b. Svenska Akademiens grammatik. Satser och meningar. Stockholm: Norstedts ordbok.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lisa deMena, Travis. 1991. Parameters of phrase structure and verb-second phenomena. In Freidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, 339–364. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Haegeman, Liliane. 2007. The derivation of subject-initial V2. Linguistic Inquiry 38 (1), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldmann, Christian. 2008. Input och output. Ordföljd i svenska barns huvudsatser och bisatser. Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit R. 2003. Word order in wh-questions in a north Norwegian dialect: Some evidence from an acquisition study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26 (1), 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2009a. The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure, and Economy. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2009b. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36, 1023–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwart, C. Jan Wouter. 1993. Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar