Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:06:00.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stephen McClatchie, ed., The Mahler Family Letters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006). 440 pp. $65

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2011

Judah E. Adashi
Affiliation:
Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In 1924, Mahler's widow, Alma Mahler-Werfel, published his letters in Gustav Mahler: Briefe, 1879–1911, which has since appeared in two updated editions: Knud Martner's Selected Letters of Gustav Mahler (New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1979)Google Scholar , and Herta Blaukopf's Gustav Mahler Briefe (Vienna: Paul Zsolnay, 1982; rev. 1996)Google Scholar . Blaukopf has also compiled Mahler's unknown letters in Gustav Mahler Unbekannte Briefe (Vienna: Paul Zsolnay, 1983)Google Scholar . Mahler's letters to Alma were published by Henry-Louis de La Grange and Günther Weiβ as Ein Glück ohne Ruh': die Briefe Gustav Mahlers an Alma (Berlin: Siedler Verlag, 1995)Google Scholar . In addition, some of his correspondence with prominent friends and contemporaries has been anthologized; see n. 5.

2 As McClatchie notes in the introduction, Alma Mahler-Werfel's books on her life with Mahler ‘are fascinating and frustrating monuments of self-aggrandisement and selfjustification … riddled with errors, distortions, and self-serving depictions of events’ (p. 13).

3 This statement is echoed in a striking remark that Mahler made about his compositions, recorded by Natalie Bauer-Lechner: ‘A splendid example for creative people is Jacob, who struggles with God until He blesses him … God also does not want to bless me; only in frightful struggle over the existence of my works do I wrest it from Him.’ Natalie Bauer-Lechner, Recollections of Gustav Mahler, trans. Newlin, Dika, ed. Franklin, Peter (London: Faber, 1980): 76Google Scholar.

4 In his essay, ‘Gustav Mahler: Formation and Transformation’, historian Carl Schorske characterizes the dichotomy as follows: ‘As conductor, his task was to preserve and invigorate [the classical tradition], a task in which he deeply believed. As composer, he aspired to construct a picture of the world true to his modern experience.’ Schorske, Carl, Thinking with History: Explorations in the Passage to Modernism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998): 172Google Scholar.

5 Mahler's correspondence with Richard Strauss is documented in Blaukopf's, HertaGustav Mahler–Richard Strauss Briefwechsel 1888–1911 (Munich: R. Piper, 1980)Google Scholar.