Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:27:01.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pandora's Box of ‘Doi Moi’: the Open-Door Policy and Contemporary Theatre in Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Catherine Diamond
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the 1990s, Vietnamese traditional theatre has seen its popular base eroded by foreign videos, television imports, and the films that have poured into the country since the advent of the ‘open door’ policy, or doi moi. As that policy is primarily economic in purpose, the advantages offered to the national culture have been questionable. The traditional forms here discussed by Catherine Diamond – tuong, hat boi, and cheo – have lost much of their status in the urban areas, though still popular in the countryside. However, the forms which address contemporary issues – ‘renovated theatre’ (cai luong), spoken theatre (kich noi), and, most recently, ‘mini-theatre’ (san khau nho) – play to significant numbers in Saigon and Hanoi, often employing a distinctive vein of satirical humour. Though trained in the academies of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, Vietnamese dramatists have now broken away from the socialist realist ideal and are looking towards the West and China for new artistic developments. The author of this survey, Catherine Diamond, is a dancer and drama professor in Taiwan. She has recently published Sringara Tales, a collection of short stories about the traditional dancers in Southeast Asia.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 13 , Issue 52 , November 1997 , pp. 372 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nhu, Ai, 1997. Interview with the author, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 29 January.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fabion, 1960. Theatre in the East: a Survey of Asian Dance and Drama (New York: Grove Press), p. 303–7.Google Scholar
Brandon, James, 1993. ‘Vietnam’, in The Cambridge Guide to Asian Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Brandon, James, 1967. Theatre in Southeast Asia (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), p. 245–50.Google Scholar
Buttinger, Joseph, 1968. Vietnam: a Political History (New York: Praeger Publishers).Google Scholar
Cohen, Barbara, 1990. The Vietnam Guide Book (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Can, Dang Tran, 1996–1997. Interview with the author, Hanoi, Vietnam, 13–14 02.Google Scholar
Muoi, Do, 1996. ‘The Unofficial Translation of the Main Body of the Address Made by General Secretary Do Muoi at the Opening of the Eighth National Congress of Communist Party of Vietnam’, Vietnam News, 29 06.Google Scholar
Kieu, Hoang, 1987. ‘Cheo: a Vietnamese Folk Stage and Singing Theatre’, in Vietnam Social Sciences (Hanoi: Committee for Social Sciences), p. 28–34.Google Scholar
Mai, Hoang To, 1997. Interview with the author, Hanoi, Vietnam, 10 02.Google Scholar
Hoefer, Hans, 1991. Vietnam: Insight Guides (Hong Kong: APA Publications), p. 127–32.Google Scholar
Dzung, Huy, 1987. ‘Tran Huu Trang and Cai Luong in the South’, Vietnamese Studies, New Series, XVII, p. 76–86.Google Scholar
Thinh, Huy, 1996. ‘Can We Hope For More Attractive Films?’, Vietnam Courier, 02, p. 11–17.Google Scholar
Janaczewska, Noelle, 1994. ‘They're Dancing the Lambada in Hanoi’, Australasian Drama Studies, No. 25, p. 152–65.Google Scholar
Ly, Le Hong, 1996. Interview with the author and later correspondence, Hanoi, Vietnam, 9 02.Google Scholar
Ly, Le Minh, 1996. ‘Cultural Education Should Be Targeted’, Vietnam News, 07, p. 1.Google Scholar
Cung, Ly Khac, 1996–1997. Interviews with the author, Hanoi, Vietnam, 10–12 02.Google Scholar
Mackerras, Colin, 1987. ‘Theatre in Vietnam’, Asian Theatre Journal, IV, No. 1, p. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettienen, Jukka, 1993. Classical Dance and Theatre in South-East Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 162–8.Google Scholar
Thao, Ngo, 1987. ‘The Problems of Kich Noi at Present’, Vietnam Social Sciences (Hanoi: Committee for Social Sciences), p. 66–71.Google Scholar
Linh, Ngoc, 1993. The House With No Men (Ngoi nah khong co dan ong) (Hanoi: Nha xuat ban san khau).Google Scholar
Loc, Nguyen Due, 1987. ‘Vietnamese Theatre and its Friends’, Vietnam Social Science (Hanoi: Committee for Social Sciences), p. 83–7.Google Scholar
Ngat, Nguyen Thi Hong, 1997. Interview with the author, Hanoi, Vietnam, 9 02.Google Scholar
Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Minh, 1996–1997. Interviews with the author, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 25 January–6 02.Google Scholar
Thanh, Pham Thi, 1996–1997. Interviews with the author, Hanoi, Vietnam, 12–15 02.Google Scholar
Ty, Pham Van, 1996. Interview with the author, Hanoi, Vietnam, 9 02.Google Scholar
Lien, Phu My, 1996–1997. Interviews with the author and later correspondence, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 5–6 02.Google Scholar
Thang, Tat, 1987. ‘Tuong: the Art of the Heroes with a Noble Ideal’, Vietnam Social Sciences (Hanoi: Committee for Social Sciences), p. 23–27.Google Scholar
Minh, Thanh, 1996. ‘Low-Budget Films out of Fashion’, Vietnam News, 2 02.Google Scholar
The Gioi Publishers (no author), 1995. Vietnam (Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers).Google Scholar
To Tranh, Ngoc, 1996. Interview with the author and later correspondence, Hanoi, Vietnam, 10 02.Google Scholar
Ngoc, Tran Minh, 1996–1997. Interviews with the author, Hanoi, Vietnam, 5–7 02.Google Scholar
Khe, Tran Van, 1996. Correspondence with the author, 10 04.Google Scholar
Luong, Tu, 1987. ‘Cai luong: a Theatre in Rapid Development’, Vietnam Social Sciences (Hanoi: Committee for Social Sciences), p. 56–65.Google Scholar