Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:14:38.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Making the Word Count: towards an Analytical Database of Theatre Reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Abstract

Reviews are an indispensable resource for the theatre historian – records not only of individual productions and performances but of broader cultural attitudes. However, the few attempts to account for the review as a form are compromised by outmoded models both of authorship and, in particular, of language itself. This article describes the rationale, development, functionality, and initial results of an electronic database of theatre reviews which permits analysis of the form according to the principles of corpus linguistics. Such an approach, argues David Roberts, can track across a large body of texts questions of conceptual vocabulary, reader-orientation, and – as the expansion of the corpus permits – generic variation and historical change. Initial searches demonstrate the embedding of much mainstream reviewing in neo-Aristotelian assumptions about dramatic form and effect, derived from the New Critical backgrounds of many reviewers, and suggest the means by which readers are made complicit with such partial representations. David Roberts teaches English and Drama at University College Worcester. His publications include three volumes in the World's Classics series for Oxford University Press, and a monograph on seventeenth-century audiences.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.See, for example, Christine Carson, ‘Drama and Theatre Studies in the Multimedia Age: Reviewing the Situation’; and Smith, Barry, ‘Live Art's Digital Horizons: Recording Recent Developments in Live Art Practices’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, XII, No. 4 (11 1997), p. 251–7 and 269–75.Google Scholar
2.Roberts, David, ‘Towards a Study of Theatre Journalism’, Studies in Theatre Production, No. 16 (1997), p. 129–38.Google Scholar
3.Ward, A. C., Specimens of English Dramatic Criticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945), p. 45.Google Scholar
4.Carey, John, Preface to The Faber Book of Reportage (London: Faber, 1987), p. xxxii.Google Scholar
5.Wardle, Irving, Theatre Criticism (London: Routledge, 1992), p. 41–4, 58, 64.Google Scholar
6.Swales, John, Genre Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
7.Forrester, Michael A., Psychology of Language (London: Sage, 1996).Google Scholar
8.See, for example, Beard, Adrian, The Language of Sport (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
9.Forrester, , op. cit., p. 32.Google Scholar
10.See Ball, C. N., ‘Automated Text Analysis: Cautionary Tales’, in Literary and Linguistic Computing, IX, No. 4 (1994), p. 295302; C. J. Fillmore, ‘Corpus Linguistics or Computer-Aided Armchair Linguistics’, in J. Svartvik, ed., Directions of Corpus Linguistics, Proceedings of Nobel Symposium, LXXXII (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992), p. 35–60; and S. Johansson, ‘Mens Sana in Corpore Sano: On the Role of Corpora in Linguistic Research’, European English Messenger, No. 4 (1995), p. 19–25.Google Scholar
11.Roberts, David and Woodman, Lance, ‘A Corpus Linguistics Study of the Theatre Review: First Steps’, Studies in Theatre Production, No. 18 (1998), p. 627.Google Scholar
12.Sinclair, John, Corpus, Concordance, Collocation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
13.Clear, J., ‘Corpus Sampling’, in Leitner, G., ed., New Directions in English Language Corpora (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992), p. 2131.Google Scholar
14.Willis, David, The Lexical Syllabus (London: Collins ELT, 1990).Google Scholar
15.Billington, Michael, review of Macbeth, by Shakespeare, William, dir. Noble, Adrian, The Guardian, 18 12 1993, p. 26.Google Scholar
16.Billington, Michael, review of Macbeth, by Shakespeare, William, dir. Noble, Adrian, The Guardian, 18 12 1993, p. 26.Google Scholar
17.Billington, Michael, review of Macbeth, by Shakespeare, William, dir. Noble, Adrian, The Guardian, 18 12 1993, p. 26.Google Scholar
18.Billington, , review of Macbeth, by Shakespeare, William, dir. Rylance, Mark, The Guardian, 27 09 1995, p. 12.Google Scholar
19.See Wales, Katie, Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
20.Billington, , review of Rylance Macbeth, op. cit.Google Scholar